Cargando…

Comparison of different optomotor response readouts for visual testing in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-optic neuritis

Optomotor response is increasingly used in preclinical research for evaluating the visual function in rodents. However, the most suitable measuring protocol for specific scientific questions is not always established. We aimed to determine the optimal parameters for visual function analysis in exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hecker, Christina, Dietrich, Michael, Issberner, Andrea, Hartung, Hans-Peter, Albrecht, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32682447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-01889-z
_version_ 1783560650565353472
author Hecker, Christina
Dietrich, Michael
Issberner, Andrea
Hartung, Hans-Peter
Albrecht, Philipp
author_facet Hecker, Christina
Dietrich, Michael
Issberner, Andrea
Hartung, Hans-Peter
Albrecht, Philipp
author_sort Hecker, Christina
collection PubMed
description Optomotor response is increasingly used in preclinical research for evaluating the visual function in rodents. However, the most suitable measuring protocol for specific scientific questions is not always established. We aimed to determine the optimal parameters for visual function analysis in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis optic neuritis (EAEON), an animal model for multiple sclerosis. Contrast sensitivity as well as spatial frequency both had a low variance and a good test-retest reliability. Also, both parameters were able to differentiate between the EAEON and the control group. Correlations with the retinal degeneration, assessed by optical coherence tomography, the infiltration of immune cells, and the clinical disability score revealed that spatial frequency was superior to contrast sensitivity analysis. We therefore conclude that spatial frequency testing is better suited as visual acuity assessment in C57Bl/6 J EAEON mice. Furthermore, contrast sensitivity measurements are more time consuming, possibly leading to more stress for the animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7368714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73687142020-07-20 Comparison of different optomotor response readouts for visual testing in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-optic neuritis Hecker, Christina Dietrich, Michael Issberner, Andrea Hartung, Hans-Peter Albrecht, Philipp J Neuroinflammation Short Report Optomotor response is increasingly used in preclinical research for evaluating the visual function in rodents. However, the most suitable measuring protocol for specific scientific questions is not always established. We aimed to determine the optimal parameters for visual function analysis in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis optic neuritis (EAEON), an animal model for multiple sclerosis. Contrast sensitivity as well as spatial frequency both had a low variance and a good test-retest reliability. Also, both parameters were able to differentiate between the EAEON and the control group. Correlations with the retinal degeneration, assessed by optical coherence tomography, the infiltration of immune cells, and the clinical disability score revealed that spatial frequency was superior to contrast sensitivity analysis. We therefore conclude that spatial frequency testing is better suited as visual acuity assessment in C57Bl/6 J EAEON mice. Furthermore, contrast sensitivity measurements are more time consuming, possibly leading to more stress for the animals. BioMed Central 2020-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7368714/ /pubmed/32682447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-01889-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Short Report
Hecker, Christina
Dietrich, Michael
Issberner, Andrea
Hartung, Hans-Peter
Albrecht, Philipp
Comparison of different optomotor response readouts for visual testing in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-optic neuritis
title Comparison of different optomotor response readouts for visual testing in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-optic neuritis
title_full Comparison of different optomotor response readouts for visual testing in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-optic neuritis
title_fullStr Comparison of different optomotor response readouts for visual testing in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-optic neuritis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different optomotor response readouts for visual testing in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-optic neuritis
title_short Comparison of different optomotor response readouts for visual testing in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-optic neuritis
title_sort comparison of different optomotor response readouts for visual testing in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-optic neuritis
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32682447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-01889-z
work_keys_str_mv AT heckerchristina comparisonofdifferentoptomotorresponsereadoutsforvisualtestinginexperimentalautoimmuneencephalomyelitisopticneuritis
AT dietrichmichael comparisonofdifferentoptomotorresponsereadoutsforvisualtestinginexperimentalautoimmuneencephalomyelitisopticneuritis
AT issbernerandrea comparisonofdifferentoptomotorresponsereadoutsforvisualtestinginexperimentalautoimmuneencephalomyelitisopticneuritis
AT hartunghanspeter comparisonofdifferentoptomotorresponsereadoutsforvisualtestinginexperimentalautoimmuneencephalomyelitisopticneuritis
AT albrechtphilipp comparisonofdifferentoptomotorresponsereadoutsforvisualtestinginexperimentalautoimmuneencephalomyelitisopticneuritis