Cargando…
Stakeholders’ experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system?
BACKGROUND: The importance of engaging stakeholders in the research process is well recognised. Whilst engagement is important, guidelines and practices vary for how stakeholders should be involved in research and how to facilitate effective collaborative relationships. METHODS: This study aimed to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32682426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00599-5 |
_version_ | 1783560666619052032 |
---|---|
author | Laird, Yvonne Manner, Jillian Baldwin, Louise Hunter, Ruth McAteer, John Rodgers, Sarah Williamson, Chloë Jepson, Ruth |
author_facet | Laird, Yvonne Manner, Jillian Baldwin, Louise Hunter, Ruth McAteer, John Rodgers, Sarah Williamson, Chloë Jepson, Ruth |
author_sort | Laird, Yvonne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The importance of engaging stakeholders in the research process is well recognised. Whilst engagement is important, guidelines and practices vary for how stakeholders should be involved in research and how to facilitate effective collaborative relationships. METHODS: This study aimed to explore the perspectives and experiences of stakeholders involved in the policy and practice area of outdoor space and non-communicable disease prevention. Stakeholders interviewed included academics, practitioners, policy-makers, knowledge brokers and a funder. RESULTS: The findings suggest that stakeholders had positive experiences when engaged meaningfully in the research process, where research projects were carefully planned and managed with attention to context and culture, and where the research team was effective, respectful and communicative. These factors help to facilitate the translation of research into policy and practice. However, multiple challenges of collaborative research were identified which related to structural and systemic challenges, building and maintaining relationships, use and collection of data and information, cultural perceptions of research and research generation, and getting evidence into action. Participants felt that changing the funding system, exploring more collaborative research methodologies, improved research translation, and more effective collaborative relationships at all stages of the research process could address some of these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight that, whilst stakeholder engagement in research was considered important, structural, cultural and individual practices impacted how this worked in practice. Identifying and testing solutions to address these challenges could improve synergies between research, policy, and practice and lead to the production of impactful research that reduces wastage of public funding, improves implementation of findings and ultimately improves public health outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7368787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73687872020-07-20 Stakeholders’ experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system? Laird, Yvonne Manner, Jillian Baldwin, Louise Hunter, Ruth McAteer, John Rodgers, Sarah Williamson, Chloë Jepson, Ruth Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: The importance of engaging stakeholders in the research process is well recognised. Whilst engagement is important, guidelines and practices vary for how stakeholders should be involved in research and how to facilitate effective collaborative relationships. METHODS: This study aimed to explore the perspectives and experiences of stakeholders involved in the policy and practice area of outdoor space and non-communicable disease prevention. Stakeholders interviewed included academics, practitioners, policy-makers, knowledge brokers and a funder. RESULTS: The findings suggest that stakeholders had positive experiences when engaged meaningfully in the research process, where research projects were carefully planned and managed with attention to context and culture, and where the research team was effective, respectful and communicative. These factors help to facilitate the translation of research into policy and practice. However, multiple challenges of collaborative research were identified which related to structural and systemic challenges, building and maintaining relationships, use and collection of data and information, cultural perceptions of research and research generation, and getting evidence into action. Participants felt that changing the funding system, exploring more collaborative research methodologies, improved research translation, and more effective collaborative relationships at all stages of the research process could address some of these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight that, whilst stakeholder engagement in research was considered important, structural, cultural and individual practices impacted how this worked in practice. Identifying and testing solutions to address these challenges could improve synergies between research, policy, and practice and lead to the production of impactful research that reduces wastage of public funding, improves implementation of findings and ultimately improves public health outcomes. BioMed Central 2020-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7368787/ /pubmed/32682426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00599-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Laird, Yvonne Manner, Jillian Baldwin, Louise Hunter, Ruth McAteer, John Rodgers, Sarah Williamson, Chloë Jepson, Ruth Stakeholders’ experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system? |
title | Stakeholders’ experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system? |
title_full | Stakeholders’ experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system? |
title_fullStr | Stakeholders’ experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system? |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholders’ experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system? |
title_short | Stakeholders’ experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system? |
title_sort | stakeholders’ experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32682426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00599-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lairdyvonne stakeholdersexperiencesofthepublichealthresearchprocesstimetochangethesystem AT mannerjillian stakeholdersexperiencesofthepublichealthresearchprocesstimetochangethesystem AT baldwinlouise stakeholdersexperiencesofthepublichealthresearchprocesstimetochangethesystem AT hunterruth stakeholdersexperiencesofthepublichealthresearchprocesstimetochangethesystem AT mcateerjohn stakeholdersexperiencesofthepublichealthresearchprocesstimetochangethesystem AT rodgerssarah stakeholdersexperiencesofthepublichealthresearchprocesstimetochangethesystem AT williamsonchloe stakeholdersexperiencesofthepublichealthresearchprocesstimetochangethesystem AT jepsonruth stakeholdersexperiencesofthepublichealthresearchprocesstimetochangethesystem |