Cargando…
Do we really need the “detriment” for radiation protection?
The purpose of the ICRP detriment concept is to enable a quantitative comparison of stochastic radiation damage for the various organs. For this purpose, the organ-specific nominal risk coefficients are weighted with a function that is intended to express the amount of damage or, respectively, the s...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32583291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-020-00861-y |
_version_ | 1783560676318380032 |
---|---|
author | Breckow, Joachim |
author_facet | Breckow, Joachim |
author_sort | Breckow, Joachim |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of the ICRP detriment concept is to enable a quantitative comparison of stochastic radiation damage for the various organs. For this purpose, the organ-specific nominal risk coefficients are weighted with a function that is intended to express the amount of damage or, respectively, the severity of a disease. This function incorporates a variety of variables that do not depend on radiation parameters, but on characteristics of the disease itself. The question is raised as to whether the rather subtle way of defining the amount of damage is necessary for radiation protection purposes and whether a much simpler relationship can serve for this purpose as well or even better. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7368864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73688642020-07-22 Do we really need the “detriment” for radiation protection? Breckow, Joachim Radiat Environ Biophys Controversial Issue The purpose of the ICRP detriment concept is to enable a quantitative comparison of stochastic radiation damage for the various organs. For this purpose, the organ-specific nominal risk coefficients are weighted with a function that is intended to express the amount of damage or, respectively, the severity of a disease. This function incorporates a variety of variables that do not depend on radiation parameters, but on characteristics of the disease itself. The question is raised as to whether the rather subtle way of defining the amount of damage is necessary for radiation protection purposes and whether a much simpler relationship can serve for this purpose as well or even better. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7368864/ /pubmed/32583291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-020-00861-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Controversial Issue Breckow, Joachim Do we really need the “detriment” for radiation protection? |
title | Do we really need the “detriment” for radiation protection? |
title_full | Do we really need the “detriment” for radiation protection? |
title_fullStr | Do we really need the “detriment” for radiation protection? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do we really need the “detriment” for radiation protection? |
title_short | Do we really need the “detriment” for radiation protection? |
title_sort | do we really need the “detriment” for radiation protection? |
topic | Controversial Issue |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7368864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32583291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-020-00861-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT breckowjoachim dowereallyneedthedetrimentforradiationprotection |