Cargando…

Light dependent courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster

Differences in courtship signals and perception are well-known among Drosophila species. One such described difference is the dependency on light, and thus presumably vision, for copulation success. Many studies have described a difference in light-dependent copulation success between D. melanogaste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahandeh, Michael P., Brock, Cameryn, Turner, Thomas L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742789
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9499
_version_ 1783560708092329984
author Shahandeh, Michael P.
Brock, Cameryn
Turner, Thomas L.
author_facet Shahandeh, Michael P.
Brock, Cameryn
Turner, Thomas L.
author_sort Shahandeh, Michael P.
collection PubMed
description Differences in courtship signals and perception are well-known among Drosophila species. One such described difference is the dependency on light, and thus presumably vision, for copulation success. Many studies have described a difference in light-dependent copulation success between D. melanogaster and D. simulans, identifying D. simulans as a light-dependent species, and D. melanogaster as a light-independent one. However, many of these studies use assays of varying design and few strains to represent the entire species. Here, we attempt to better characterize this purported difference using 11 strains of each species, paired by collection location, in behavioral assays conducted at two different exposure times. We show that, while there is a species-wide difference in magnitude of light-dependent copulation success, D. melanogaster copulation success is, on average, still impaired in the dark at both exposure times we measured. Additionally, there is significant variation in strain-specific ability to copulate in the dark in both species across two different exposure times. We find that this variation correlates strongly with longitude in D. melanogaster, but not in D. simulans. We hypothesize that differences in species history and demography may explain behavioral variation. Finally, we use courtship assays to show that light-dependent copulation success in one D. simulans strain is driven in part by both males and females. We discuss potential differences in courtship signals and/or signal importance between these species and potential for further comparative studies for functional characterization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7369021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73690212020-07-31 Light dependent courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster Shahandeh, Michael P. Brock, Cameryn Turner, Thomas L. PeerJ Animal Behavior Differences in courtship signals and perception are well-known among Drosophila species. One such described difference is the dependency on light, and thus presumably vision, for copulation success. Many studies have described a difference in light-dependent copulation success between D. melanogaster and D. simulans, identifying D. simulans as a light-dependent species, and D. melanogaster as a light-independent one. However, many of these studies use assays of varying design and few strains to represent the entire species. Here, we attempt to better characterize this purported difference using 11 strains of each species, paired by collection location, in behavioral assays conducted at two different exposure times. We show that, while there is a species-wide difference in magnitude of light-dependent copulation success, D. melanogaster copulation success is, on average, still impaired in the dark at both exposure times we measured. Additionally, there is significant variation in strain-specific ability to copulate in the dark in both species across two different exposure times. We find that this variation correlates strongly with longitude in D. melanogaster, but not in D. simulans. We hypothesize that differences in species history and demography may explain behavioral variation. Finally, we use courtship assays to show that light-dependent copulation success in one D. simulans strain is driven in part by both males and females. We discuss potential differences in courtship signals and/or signal importance between these species and potential for further comparative studies for functional characterization. PeerJ Inc. 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7369021/ /pubmed/32742789 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9499 Text en ©2020 Shahandeh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Animal Behavior
Shahandeh, Michael P.
Brock, Cameryn
Turner, Thomas L.
Light dependent courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster
title Light dependent courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster
title_full Light dependent courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster
title_fullStr Light dependent courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster
title_full_unstemmed Light dependent courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster
title_short Light dependent courtship behavior in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster
title_sort light dependent courtship behavior in drosophila simulans and d. melanogaster
topic Animal Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742789
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9499
work_keys_str_mv AT shahandehmichaelp lightdependentcourtshipbehaviorindrosophilasimulansanddmelanogaster
AT brockcameryn lightdependentcourtshipbehaviorindrosophilasimulansanddmelanogaster
AT turnerthomasl lightdependentcourtshipbehaviorindrosophilasimulansanddmelanogaster