Cargando…

A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes

BACKGROUND: The traditional surgical treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is time-consuming owing to changing the surgical position and larger surgical trauma because of open surgery in handling the distal ureter. Therefore, we created a new surgical technique of combination...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Liming, Wang, Wenkuan, Zhao, Qinxin, Wen, Yuhong, Zhou, Xiaoguang, Han, Hu, Zhang, Xiaodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765075
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S259964
_version_ 1783560766155128832
author Song, Liming
Wang, Wenkuan
Zhao, Qinxin
Wen, Yuhong
Zhou, Xiaoguang
Han, Hu
Zhang, Xiaodong
author_facet Song, Liming
Wang, Wenkuan
Zhao, Qinxin
Wen, Yuhong
Zhou, Xiaoguang
Han, Hu
Zhang, Xiaodong
author_sort Song, Liming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The traditional surgical treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is time-consuming owing to changing the surgical position and larger surgical trauma because of open surgery in handling the distal ureter. Therefore, we created a new surgical technique of combination retroperitoneal with transperitoneal (CRT) laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) in a single position and here report our early outcomes. METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2019, a total of 106 patients underwent LNU by a single surgeon at our department, of whom 50 patients underwent standard technique and 56 patients underwent CRT technique. Relevant clinical data were collected including each patient’s characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up results. A comparative analysis between standard LNU cases and CRT LNU cases was performed. RESULTS: LNU was performed successfully on all 106 patients. There was no significant difference in patients’ characteristics. Compared to the standard group, patients in the CRT group had shorter operative time (P=0.001), less estimated blood loss (EBL) (P<0.001), lower visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (P=0.020) and less scarring (P=0.013). The median time of surgical drain stay decreased from 5 to 2 days (P=0.004) and median hospital stay after surgery decreased from 5 to 3 days (P=0.001). The complication rates did not show statistical differences between the two groups within the first 30 days postoperatively (P=0.263). For the long-term complications, the incidence of abdomen bulge or incisional hernia in the CRT group was less than that in the standard group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The CRT technique, which combines both the advantages of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches, is a more minimally invasive, simplified and effective way to perform the LNU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7369369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73693692020-08-05 A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes Song, Liming Wang, Wenkuan Zhao, Qinxin Wen, Yuhong Zhou, Xiaoguang Han, Hu Zhang, Xiaodong Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The traditional surgical treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is time-consuming owing to changing the surgical position and larger surgical trauma because of open surgery in handling the distal ureter. Therefore, we created a new surgical technique of combination retroperitoneal with transperitoneal (CRT) laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) in a single position and here report our early outcomes. METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2019, a total of 106 patients underwent LNU by a single surgeon at our department, of whom 50 patients underwent standard technique and 56 patients underwent CRT technique. Relevant clinical data were collected including each patient’s characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up results. A comparative analysis between standard LNU cases and CRT LNU cases was performed. RESULTS: LNU was performed successfully on all 106 patients. There was no significant difference in patients’ characteristics. Compared to the standard group, patients in the CRT group had shorter operative time (P=0.001), less estimated blood loss (EBL) (P<0.001), lower visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (P=0.020) and less scarring (P=0.013). The median time of surgical drain stay decreased from 5 to 2 days (P=0.004) and median hospital stay after surgery decreased from 5 to 3 days (P=0.001). The complication rates did not show statistical differences between the two groups within the first 30 days postoperatively (P=0.263). For the long-term complications, the incidence of abdomen bulge or incisional hernia in the CRT group was less than that in the standard group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The CRT technique, which combines both the advantages of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches, is a more minimally invasive, simplified and effective way to perform the LNU. Dove 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7369369/ /pubmed/32765075 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S259964 Text en © 2020 Song et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Song, Liming
Wang, Wenkuan
Zhao, Qinxin
Wen, Yuhong
Zhou, Xiaoguang
Han, Hu
Zhang, Xiaodong
A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes
title A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes
title_full A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes
title_fullStr A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes
title_short A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes
title_sort new surgical technique of combination retroperitoneal with transperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in a single position and comparative outcomes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765075
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S259964
work_keys_str_mv AT songliming anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT wangwenkuan anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT zhaoqinxin anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT wenyuhong anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT zhouxiaoguang anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT hanhu anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT zhangxiaodong anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT songliming newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT wangwenkuan newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT zhaoqinxin newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT wenyuhong newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT zhouxiaoguang newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT hanhu newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes
AT zhangxiaodong newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes