Cargando…
A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes
BACKGROUND: The traditional surgical treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is time-consuming owing to changing the surgical position and larger surgical trauma because of open surgery in handling the distal ureter. Therefore, we created a new surgical technique of combination...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765075 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S259964 |
_version_ | 1783560766155128832 |
---|---|
author | Song, Liming Wang, Wenkuan Zhao, Qinxin Wen, Yuhong Zhou, Xiaoguang Han, Hu Zhang, Xiaodong |
author_facet | Song, Liming Wang, Wenkuan Zhao, Qinxin Wen, Yuhong Zhou, Xiaoguang Han, Hu Zhang, Xiaodong |
author_sort | Song, Liming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The traditional surgical treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is time-consuming owing to changing the surgical position and larger surgical trauma because of open surgery in handling the distal ureter. Therefore, we created a new surgical technique of combination retroperitoneal with transperitoneal (CRT) laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) in a single position and here report our early outcomes. METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2019, a total of 106 patients underwent LNU by a single surgeon at our department, of whom 50 patients underwent standard technique and 56 patients underwent CRT technique. Relevant clinical data were collected including each patient’s characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up results. A comparative analysis between standard LNU cases and CRT LNU cases was performed. RESULTS: LNU was performed successfully on all 106 patients. There was no significant difference in patients’ characteristics. Compared to the standard group, patients in the CRT group had shorter operative time (P=0.001), less estimated blood loss (EBL) (P<0.001), lower visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (P=0.020) and less scarring (P=0.013). The median time of surgical drain stay decreased from 5 to 2 days (P=0.004) and median hospital stay after surgery decreased from 5 to 3 days (P=0.001). The complication rates did not show statistical differences between the two groups within the first 30 days postoperatively (P=0.263). For the long-term complications, the incidence of abdomen bulge or incisional hernia in the CRT group was less than that in the standard group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The CRT technique, which combines both the advantages of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches, is a more minimally invasive, simplified and effective way to perform the LNU. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7369369 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73693692020-08-05 A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes Song, Liming Wang, Wenkuan Zhao, Qinxin Wen, Yuhong Zhou, Xiaoguang Han, Hu Zhang, Xiaodong Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The traditional surgical treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is time-consuming owing to changing the surgical position and larger surgical trauma because of open surgery in handling the distal ureter. Therefore, we created a new surgical technique of combination retroperitoneal with transperitoneal (CRT) laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) in a single position and here report our early outcomes. METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2019, a total of 106 patients underwent LNU by a single surgeon at our department, of whom 50 patients underwent standard technique and 56 patients underwent CRT technique. Relevant clinical data were collected including each patient’s characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up results. A comparative analysis between standard LNU cases and CRT LNU cases was performed. RESULTS: LNU was performed successfully on all 106 patients. There was no significant difference in patients’ characteristics. Compared to the standard group, patients in the CRT group had shorter operative time (P=0.001), less estimated blood loss (EBL) (P<0.001), lower visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (P=0.020) and less scarring (P=0.013). The median time of surgical drain stay decreased from 5 to 2 days (P=0.004) and median hospital stay after surgery decreased from 5 to 3 days (P=0.001). The complication rates did not show statistical differences between the two groups within the first 30 days postoperatively (P=0.263). For the long-term complications, the incidence of abdomen bulge or incisional hernia in the CRT group was less than that in the standard group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The CRT technique, which combines both the advantages of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches, is a more minimally invasive, simplified and effective way to perform the LNU. Dove 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7369369/ /pubmed/32765075 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S259964 Text en © 2020 Song et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Song, Liming Wang, Wenkuan Zhao, Qinxin Wen, Yuhong Zhou, Xiaoguang Han, Hu Zhang, Xiaodong A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes |
title | A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes |
title_full | A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes |
title_fullStr | A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes |
title_short | A New Surgical Technique of Combination Retroperitoneal with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Comparative Outcomes |
title_sort | new surgical technique of combination retroperitoneal with transperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in a single position and comparative outcomes |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765075 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S259964 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songliming anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT wangwenkuan anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT zhaoqinxin anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT wenyuhong anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT zhouxiaoguang anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT hanhu anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT zhangxiaodong anewsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT songliming newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT wangwenkuan newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT zhaoqinxin newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT wenyuhong newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT zhouxiaoguang newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT hanhu newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes AT zhangxiaodong newsurgicaltechniqueofcombinationretroperitonealwithtransperitoneallaparoscopicnephroureterectomyinasinglepositionandcomparativeoutcomes |