Cargando…
Does telecommuting save energy? A critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods
Teleworking has been widely perceived as a more sustainable mode of working for knowledge workers compared to the status quo of commuting to centralized offices because of its reduced dependency on transportation and centralized office space. However, the situation is far more complex than would app...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110298 |
_version_ | 1783560805902450688 |
---|---|
author | O'Brien, William Yazdani Aliabadi, Fereshteh |
author_facet | O'Brien, William Yazdani Aliabadi, Fereshteh |
author_sort | O'Brien, William |
collection | PubMed |
description | Teleworking has been widely perceived as a more sustainable mode of working for knowledge workers compared to the status quo of commuting to centralized offices because of its reduced dependency on transportation and centralized office space. However, the situation is far more complex than would appear on the surface, when the scope is expanded to include home office energy use, the Internet, long-term consumer choices, and other so-called rebound effects. Few studies have quantified home, office, transportation, and communications energy or GHG emissions implications of telecommuting simultaneously. To make progress in answering the question of whether telecommuting results in less energy use and greenhouse gas emissions than conventional centralized office working, this paper reviews results and research methods of primarily quantitative studies of any and all four domains that consider operating energy and/or greenhouse gas emissions. The results ultimately show that this problem is complex, and that current datasets and methods are generally inadequate for fully answering the research question. While most studies indicate some benefit, several suggest teleworking increases energy use – even for the domain that is thought to benefit most: transportation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7369595 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73695952020-07-20 Does telecommuting save energy? A critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods O'Brien, William Yazdani Aliabadi, Fereshteh Energy Build Article Teleworking has been widely perceived as a more sustainable mode of working for knowledge workers compared to the status quo of commuting to centralized offices because of its reduced dependency on transportation and centralized office space. However, the situation is far more complex than would appear on the surface, when the scope is expanded to include home office energy use, the Internet, long-term consumer choices, and other so-called rebound effects. Few studies have quantified home, office, transportation, and communications energy or GHG emissions implications of telecommuting simultaneously. To make progress in answering the question of whether telecommuting results in less energy use and greenhouse gas emissions than conventional centralized office working, this paper reviews results and research methods of primarily quantitative studies of any and all four domains that consider operating energy and/or greenhouse gas emissions. The results ultimately show that this problem is complex, and that current datasets and methods are generally inadequate for fully answering the research question. While most studies indicate some benefit, several suggest teleworking increases energy use – even for the domain that is thought to benefit most: transportation. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-10-15 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7369595/ /pubmed/32834440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110298 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article O'Brien, William Yazdani Aliabadi, Fereshteh Does telecommuting save energy? A critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods |
title | Does telecommuting save energy? A critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods |
title_full | Does telecommuting save energy? A critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods |
title_fullStr | Does telecommuting save energy? A critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Does telecommuting save energy? A critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods |
title_short | Does telecommuting save energy? A critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods |
title_sort | does telecommuting save energy? a critical review of quantitative studies and their research methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110298 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT obrienwilliam doestelecommutingsaveenergyacriticalreviewofquantitativestudiesandtheirresearchmethods AT yazdanialiabadifereshteh doestelecommutingsaveenergyacriticalreviewofquantitativestudiesandtheirresearchmethods |