Cargando…

Bullying Victimization among Mexican Adolescents: Psychosocial Differences from an Ecological Approach

This transversal study over a random representative sample of 1687 Mexican students attending public and private secondary schools (54% girls, 12–17 years old, M = 13.65. DT = 1.14) aimed to analyze psychosocial differences between victims and non-victims of bullying from the bioecological model. It...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nuñez-Fadda, Silvana Mabel, Castro-Castañeda, Remberto, Vargas-Jiménez, Esperanza, Musitu-Ochoa, Gonzalo, Callejas-Jerónimo, Juan Evaristo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32635567
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134831
_version_ 1783560839173767168
author Nuñez-Fadda, Silvana Mabel
Castro-Castañeda, Remberto
Vargas-Jiménez, Esperanza
Musitu-Ochoa, Gonzalo
Callejas-Jerónimo, Juan Evaristo
author_facet Nuñez-Fadda, Silvana Mabel
Castro-Castañeda, Remberto
Vargas-Jiménez, Esperanza
Musitu-Ochoa, Gonzalo
Callejas-Jerónimo, Juan Evaristo
author_sort Nuñez-Fadda, Silvana Mabel
collection PubMed
description This transversal study over a random representative sample of 1687 Mexican students attending public and private secondary schools (54% girls, 12–17 years old, M = 13.65. DT = 1.14) aimed to analyze psychosocial differences between victims and non-victims of bullying from the bioecological model. It included individual variables (ontosystem), familiar, community, and scholar factors (microsystem), and gender (macrosystem) to perform a multivariate discriminant analysis and a logistic regression analysis. The discriminant analysis found that psychological distress, offensive communication with mother and father, and a positive attitude toward social norms transgression characterized the high victimization cluster. For the non-victims, the discriminant variables were community implication, positive attitude toward institutional authority, and open communication with the mother. These variables allowed for correctly predicting membership in 76% of the cases. Logistic regression analysis found that psychological distress, offensive communication with the father, and being a boy increased the probability of high victimization, while a positive attitude toward authority, open communication with the mother, and being a girl decrease this probability. These results highlight the importance of open and offensive communication between adolescents and their parents on psychological distress, attitude toward authority, community implication, and bullying victimization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7369746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73697462020-07-21 Bullying Victimization among Mexican Adolescents: Psychosocial Differences from an Ecological Approach Nuñez-Fadda, Silvana Mabel Castro-Castañeda, Remberto Vargas-Jiménez, Esperanza Musitu-Ochoa, Gonzalo Callejas-Jerónimo, Juan Evaristo Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This transversal study over a random representative sample of 1687 Mexican students attending public and private secondary schools (54% girls, 12–17 years old, M = 13.65. DT = 1.14) aimed to analyze psychosocial differences between victims and non-victims of bullying from the bioecological model. It included individual variables (ontosystem), familiar, community, and scholar factors (microsystem), and gender (macrosystem) to perform a multivariate discriminant analysis and a logistic regression analysis. The discriminant analysis found that psychological distress, offensive communication with mother and father, and a positive attitude toward social norms transgression characterized the high victimization cluster. For the non-victims, the discriminant variables were community implication, positive attitude toward institutional authority, and open communication with the mother. These variables allowed for correctly predicting membership in 76% of the cases. Logistic regression analysis found that psychological distress, offensive communication with the father, and being a boy increased the probability of high victimization, while a positive attitude toward authority, open communication with the mother, and being a girl decrease this probability. These results highlight the importance of open and offensive communication between adolescents and their parents on psychological distress, attitude toward authority, community implication, and bullying victimization. MDPI 2020-07-04 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7369746/ /pubmed/32635567 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134831 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nuñez-Fadda, Silvana Mabel
Castro-Castañeda, Remberto
Vargas-Jiménez, Esperanza
Musitu-Ochoa, Gonzalo
Callejas-Jerónimo, Juan Evaristo
Bullying Victimization among Mexican Adolescents: Psychosocial Differences from an Ecological Approach
title Bullying Victimization among Mexican Adolescents: Psychosocial Differences from an Ecological Approach
title_full Bullying Victimization among Mexican Adolescents: Psychosocial Differences from an Ecological Approach
title_fullStr Bullying Victimization among Mexican Adolescents: Psychosocial Differences from an Ecological Approach
title_full_unstemmed Bullying Victimization among Mexican Adolescents: Psychosocial Differences from an Ecological Approach
title_short Bullying Victimization among Mexican Adolescents: Psychosocial Differences from an Ecological Approach
title_sort bullying victimization among mexican adolescents: psychosocial differences from an ecological approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32635567
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134831
work_keys_str_mv AT nunezfaddasilvanamabel bullyingvictimizationamongmexicanadolescentspsychosocialdifferencesfromanecologicalapproach
AT castrocastanedaremberto bullyingvictimizationamongmexicanadolescentspsychosocialdifferencesfromanecologicalapproach
AT vargasjimenezesperanza bullyingvictimizationamongmexicanadolescentspsychosocialdifferencesfromanecologicalapproach
AT musituochoagonzalo bullyingvictimizationamongmexicanadolescentspsychosocialdifferencesfromanecologicalapproach
AT callejasjeronimojuanevaristo bullyingvictimizationamongmexicanadolescentspsychosocialdifferencesfromanecologicalapproach