Cargando…

An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program

Tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiseman, Kara P., Hauser, Lindsay, Clark, Connie, Odumosu, Onyiyoza, Dahl, Neely, Peregoy, Jennifer, Sheffield, Christina W., Klesges, Robert C., Anderson, Roger T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32629953
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134707
_version_ 1783560846251655168
author Wiseman, Kara P.
Hauser, Lindsay
Clark, Connie
Odumosu, Onyiyoza
Dahl, Neely
Peregoy, Jennifer
Sheffield, Christina W.
Klesges, Robert C.
Anderson, Roger T.
author_facet Wiseman, Kara P.
Hauser, Lindsay
Clark, Connie
Odumosu, Onyiyoza
Dahl, Neely
Peregoy, Jennifer
Sheffield, Christina W.
Klesges, Robert C.
Anderson, Roger T.
author_sort Wiseman, Kara P.
collection PubMed
description Tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over half of cancer clinicians reporting that they do not treat or provide a referral to cessation resources. This quality improvement study evaluated the procedures for assessing and documenting tobacco use among cancer survivors and referring current smokers to cessation resources at the University of Virginia Cancer Center. Process mapping revealed 20 gaps across two major domains: electronic health record (EHR), and personnel barriers. The top identified priority was inconsistent documentation of tobacco use status as it impacted several downstream gaps. Eleven of the 20 gaps were deemed a high priority, and all were addressed during the implementation of the resulting Tobacco Treatment Program. Prioritized gaps were addressed using a combination of provider training, modifications to clinical workflow, and EHR modifications. Since implementation of solutions, the number of unique survivors receiving cessation treatment has increased from 284 survivors receiving cessation support during Year 1 of the initiative to 487 in Year 3. The resulting Tobacco Treatment Program provides a systematic, personalized, and sustainable comprehensive cessation program that optimizes the multifaceted workflow of the Cancer Center and has the potential to reduce tobacco use in a population most in need of cessation support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7369775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73697752020-07-21 An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program Wiseman, Kara P. Hauser, Lindsay Clark, Connie Odumosu, Onyiyoza Dahl, Neely Peregoy, Jennifer Sheffield, Christina W. Klesges, Robert C. Anderson, Roger T. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over half of cancer clinicians reporting that they do not treat or provide a referral to cessation resources. This quality improvement study evaluated the procedures for assessing and documenting tobacco use among cancer survivors and referring current smokers to cessation resources at the University of Virginia Cancer Center. Process mapping revealed 20 gaps across two major domains: electronic health record (EHR), and personnel barriers. The top identified priority was inconsistent documentation of tobacco use status as it impacted several downstream gaps. Eleven of the 20 gaps were deemed a high priority, and all were addressed during the implementation of the resulting Tobacco Treatment Program. Prioritized gaps were addressed using a combination of provider training, modifications to clinical workflow, and EHR modifications. Since implementation of solutions, the number of unique survivors receiving cessation treatment has increased from 284 survivors receiving cessation support during Year 1 of the initiative to 487 in Year 3. The resulting Tobacco Treatment Program provides a systematic, personalized, and sustainable comprehensive cessation program that optimizes the multifaceted workflow of the Cancer Center and has the potential to reduce tobacco use in a population most in need of cessation support. MDPI 2020-06-30 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7369775/ /pubmed/32629953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134707 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wiseman, Kara P.
Hauser, Lindsay
Clark, Connie
Odumosu, Onyiyoza
Dahl, Neely
Peregoy, Jennifer
Sheffield, Christina W.
Klesges, Robert C.
Anderson, Roger T.
An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
title An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
title_full An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
title_fullStr An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
title_short An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
title_sort evaluation of the process and quality improvement measures of the university of virginia cancer center tobacco treatment program
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32629953
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134707
work_keys_str_mv AT wisemankarap anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT hauserlindsay anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT clarkconnie anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT odumosuonyiyoza anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT dahlneely anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT peregoyjennifer anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT sheffieldchristinaw anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT klesgesrobertc anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT andersonrogert anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT wisemankarap evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT hauserlindsay evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT clarkconnie evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT odumosuonyiyoza evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT dahlneely evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT peregoyjennifer evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT sheffieldchristinaw evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT klesgesrobertc evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram
AT andersonrogert evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram