Cargando…
An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program
Tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32629953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134707 |
_version_ | 1783560846251655168 |
---|---|
author | Wiseman, Kara P. Hauser, Lindsay Clark, Connie Odumosu, Onyiyoza Dahl, Neely Peregoy, Jennifer Sheffield, Christina W. Klesges, Robert C. Anderson, Roger T. |
author_facet | Wiseman, Kara P. Hauser, Lindsay Clark, Connie Odumosu, Onyiyoza Dahl, Neely Peregoy, Jennifer Sheffield, Christina W. Klesges, Robert C. Anderson, Roger T. |
author_sort | Wiseman, Kara P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over half of cancer clinicians reporting that they do not treat or provide a referral to cessation resources. This quality improvement study evaluated the procedures for assessing and documenting tobacco use among cancer survivors and referring current smokers to cessation resources at the University of Virginia Cancer Center. Process mapping revealed 20 gaps across two major domains: electronic health record (EHR), and personnel barriers. The top identified priority was inconsistent documentation of tobacco use status as it impacted several downstream gaps. Eleven of the 20 gaps were deemed a high priority, and all were addressed during the implementation of the resulting Tobacco Treatment Program. Prioritized gaps were addressed using a combination of provider training, modifications to clinical workflow, and EHR modifications. Since implementation of solutions, the number of unique survivors receiving cessation treatment has increased from 284 survivors receiving cessation support during Year 1 of the initiative to 487 in Year 3. The resulting Tobacco Treatment Program provides a systematic, personalized, and sustainable comprehensive cessation program that optimizes the multifaceted workflow of the Cancer Center and has the potential to reduce tobacco use in a population most in need of cessation support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7369775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73697752020-07-21 An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program Wiseman, Kara P. Hauser, Lindsay Clark, Connie Odumosu, Onyiyoza Dahl, Neely Peregoy, Jennifer Sheffield, Christina W. Klesges, Robert C. Anderson, Roger T. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over half of cancer clinicians reporting that they do not treat or provide a referral to cessation resources. This quality improvement study evaluated the procedures for assessing and documenting tobacco use among cancer survivors and referring current smokers to cessation resources at the University of Virginia Cancer Center. Process mapping revealed 20 gaps across two major domains: electronic health record (EHR), and personnel barriers. The top identified priority was inconsistent documentation of tobacco use status as it impacted several downstream gaps. Eleven of the 20 gaps were deemed a high priority, and all were addressed during the implementation of the resulting Tobacco Treatment Program. Prioritized gaps were addressed using a combination of provider training, modifications to clinical workflow, and EHR modifications. Since implementation of solutions, the number of unique survivors receiving cessation treatment has increased from 284 survivors receiving cessation support during Year 1 of the initiative to 487 in Year 3. The resulting Tobacco Treatment Program provides a systematic, personalized, and sustainable comprehensive cessation program that optimizes the multifaceted workflow of the Cancer Center and has the potential to reduce tobacco use in a population most in need of cessation support. MDPI 2020-06-30 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7369775/ /pubmed/32629953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134707 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wiseman, Kara P. Hauser, Lindsay Clark, Connie Odumosu, Onyiyoza Dahl, Neely Peregoy, Jennifer Sheffield, Christina W. Klesges, Robert C. Anderson, Roger T. An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program |
title | An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program |
title_full | An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program |
title_short | An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program |
title_sort | evaluation of the process and quality improvement measures of the university of virginia cancer center tobacco treatment program |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32629953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134707 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wisemankarap anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT hauserlindsay anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT clarkconnie anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT odumosuonyiyoza anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT dahlneely anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT peregoyjennifer anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT sheffieldchristinaw anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT klesgesrobertc anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT andersonrogert anevaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT wisemankarap evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT hauserlindsay evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT clarkconnie evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT odumosuonyiyoza evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT dahlneely evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT peregoyjennifer evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT sheffieldchristinaw evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT klesgesrobertc evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram AT andersonrogert evaluationoftheprocessandqualityimprovementmeasuresoftheuniversityofvirginiacancercentertobaccotreatmentprogram |