Cargando…

Air Pollution Exposure Monitoring among Pregnant Women with and without Asthma

Background: We monitored exposure to fine particulates (PM(2.5)), ozone, nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), and ambient temperature for pregnant women with and without asthma. Methods: Women (n = 40) from the Breathe—Well-Being, Environment, Lifestyle, and Lung Function Study (2015–2018) were enrolled during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ha, Sandie, Nobles, Carrie, Kanner, Jenna, Sherman, Seth, Cho, Seung-Hyun, Perkins, Neil, Williams, Andrew, Grobman, William, Biggio, Joseph, Subramaniam, Akila, Ouidir, Marion, Chen, Zhen, Mendola, Pauline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32645870
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134888
Descripción
Sumario:Background: We monitored exposure to fine particulates (PM(2.5)), ozone, nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), and ambient temperature for pregnant women with and without asthma. Methods: Women (n = 40) from the Breathe—Well-Being, Environment, Lifestyle, and Lung Function Study (2015–2018) were enrolled during pregnancy and monitored for 2–4 days. Daily pollutants were measured using personal air monitors, indoor air monitors, and nearest Environmental Protection Agency’s stationary monitors based on GPS tracking and home address. Results: Personal-monitor measurements of PM(2.5), ozone, and NO(2) did not vary by asthma status but exposure profiles significantly differed by assessment methods. EPA stationary monitor-based methods appeared to underestimate PM(2.5) and temperature exposure and overestimate ozone and NO(2) exposure. Higher indoor-monitored PM(2.5) exposures were associated with smoking and the use of gas appliances. The proportion of waking-time during which personal monitors were worn was ~56%. Lower compliance was associated with exercise, smoking, being around a smoker, and the use of a prescription drug. Conclusions: Exposure did not vary by asthma status but was influenced by daily activities and assessment methods. Personal monitors may better capture exposures but non-compliance merits attention. Meanwhile, larger monitoring studies are warranted to further understand exposure profiles and the health effects of air pollution during pregnancy.