Cargando…

Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Implant design evolved alongside the development of implant therapy. The purpose of this finite element analysis (FEA) study was to analyze the influence of different implant designs on the stress and strain distribution to the implants and surrounding bone. Three implant designs with the same lengt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Hélder, Brizuela Velasco, Aritza, Ríos-Santos, José-Vicente, Sánchez Lasheras, Fernando, Lemos, Bernardo Ferreira, Gil, Francisco Javier, Carvalho, Alexandrine, Herrero-Climent, Mariano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134738
_version_ 1783560899518267392
author Oliveira, Hélder
Brizuela Velasco, Aritza
Ríos-Santos, José-Vicente
Sánchez Lasheras, Fernando
Lemos, Bernardo Ferreira
Gil, Francisco Javier
Carvalho, Alexandrine
Herrero-Climent, Mariano
author_facet Oliveira, Hélder
Brizuela Velasco, Aritza
Ríos-Santos, José-Vicente
Sánchez Lasheras, Fernando
Lemos, Bernardo Ferreira
Gil, Francisco Javier
Carvalho, Alexandrine
Herrero-Climent, Mariano
author_sort Oliveira, Hélder
collection PubMed
description Implant design evolved alongside the development of implant therapy. The purpose of this finite element analysis (FEA) study was to analyze the influence of different implant designs on the stress and strain distribution to the implants and surrounding bone. Three implant designs with the same length and diameter were used. The three-dimensional geometry of the bone was simulated with a cortical bone of three different thicknesses and two medullar bone densities: low density (150 Hounsfield units) and high density (850 Hounsfield units). A 30° oblique load of 150 N was applied to the implant restoration. Displacement and stress (von Mises) results were obtained for bone and dental implants. The strain and stress distributions to the bone were higher for the tissue-level implant for all types of bone. The maximum principal strain and stress decreased with an increase in cortical bone thickness for both cancellous bone densities. The distribution of the load was concentrated at the coronal portion of the bone and implants. All implants showed a good distribution of forces for non-axial loads, with higher forces concentrated at the crestal region of the bone–implant interface. Decrease in medullar bone density negatively affects the strain and stress produced by the implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7370002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73700022020-07-21 Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Oliveira, Hélder Brizuela Velasco, Aritza Ríos-Santos, José-Vicente Sánchez Lasheras, Fernando Lemos, Bernardo Ferreira Gil, Francisco Javier Carvalho, Alexandrine Herrero-Climent, Mariano Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Implant design evolved alongside the development of implant therapy. The purpose of this finite element analysis (FEA) study was to analyze the influence of different implant designs on the stress and strain distribution to the implants and surrounding bone. Three implant designs with the same length and diameter were used. The three-dimensional geometry of the bone was simulated with a cortical bone of three different thicknesses and two medullar bone densities: low density (150 Hounsfield units) and high density (850 Hounsfield units). A 30° oblique load of 150 N was applied to the implant restoration. Displacement and stress (von Mises) results were obtained for bone and dental implants. The strain and stress distributions to the bone were higher for the tissue-level implant for all types of bone. The maximum principal strain and stress decreased with an increase in cortical bone thickness for both cancellous bone densities. The distribution of the load was concentrated at the coronal portion of the bone and implants. All implants showed a good distribution of forces for non-axial loads, with higher forces concentrated at the crestal region of the bone–implant interface. Decrease in medullar bone density negatively affects the strain and stress produced by the implants. MDPI 2020-07-01 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7370002/ /pubmed/32630294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134738 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Oliveira, Hélder
Brizuela Velasco, Aritza
Ríos-Santos, José-Vicente
Sánchez Lasheras, Fernando
Lemos, Bernardo Ferreira
Gil, Francisco Javier
Carvalho, Alexandrine
Herrero-Climent, Mariano
Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title_full Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title_short Effect of Different Implant Designs on Strain and Stress Distribution under Non-Axial Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
title_sort effect of different implant designs on strain and stress distribution under non-axial loading: a three-dimensional finite element analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134738
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveirahelder effectofdifferentimplantdesignsonstrainandstressdistributionundernonaxialloadingathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT brizuelavelascoaritza effectofdifferentimplantdesignsonstrainandstressdistributionundernonaxialloadingathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT riossantosjosevicente effectofdifferentimplantdesignsonstrainandstressdistributionundernonaxialloadingathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT sanchezlasherasfernando effectofdifferentimplantdesignsonstrainandstressdistributionundernonaxialloadingathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT lemosbernardoferreira effectofdifferentimplantdesignsonstrainandstressdistributionundernonaxialloadingathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT gilfranciscojavier effectofdifferentimplantdesignsonstrainandstressdistributionundernonaxialloadingathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT carvalhoalexandrine effectofdifferentimplantdesignsonstrainandstressdistributionundernonaxialloadingathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis
AT herreroclimentmariano effectofdifferentimplantdesignsonstrainandstressdistributionundernonaxialloadingathreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysis