Cargando…
Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: The aim of this single-use, four-treatment, four-period (visit), cross-over, mono-centered, examiner-blind, cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy in dental plaque removal of a U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (U) compared to a conventional powere...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32605239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134649 |
_version_ | 1783560917859958784 |
---|---|
author | Nieri, Michele Giuntini, Veronica Pagliaro, Umberto Giani, Monica Franchi, Lorenzo Franceschi, Debora |
author_facet | Nieri, Michele Giuntini, Veronica Pagliaro, Umberto Giani, Monica Franchi, Lorenzo Franceschi, Debora |
author_sort | Nieri, Michele |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The aim of this single-use, four-treatment, four-period (visit), cross-over, mono-centered, examiner-blind, cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy in dental plaque removal of a U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (U) compared to a conventional powered toothbrush (P), a habitual toothbrushing procedure (H), and no brushing (N). Methods: Eligible participants were volunteer students. Primary outcome measure was the reduction in full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) after brushing. The secondary outcome variable was a visual analogic scale (VAS) on subjective clean mouth sensation. Mixed models were performed for difference in FMPS and VAS. Results: Twenty-two participants were randomized to the treatments in the four periods of the study. The differences between treatments in FMPS reduction after brushing were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The differences were statistically significant between the U and P groups (difference −48; 95% CI from −54 to −41) favoring the P group, and between the U and H groups (difference −45; 95% CI from −52 to −39) favoring the H group. On the contrary, the difference between the U and N groups was not significant (difference 5; 95% CI from −2 to 12) favoring the U group. The differences between treatments in clean mouth VAS was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) favoring the P and H groups. Conclusions: The U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush tested in this study proved to be not effective in removing dental plaque. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7370079 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73700792020-07-21 Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial Nieri, Michele Giuntini, Veronica Pagliaro, Umberto Giani, Monica Franchi, Lorenzo Franceschi, Debora Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The aim of this single-use, four-treatment, four-period (visit), cross-over, mono-centered, examiner-blind, cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy in dental plaque removal of a U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (U) compared to a conventional powered toothbrush (P), a habitual toothbrushing procedure (H), and no brushing (N). Methods: Eligible participants were volunteer students. Primary outcome measure was the reduction in full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) after brushing. The secondary outcome variable was a visual analogic scale (VAS) on subjective clean mouth sensation. Mixed models were performed for difference in FMPS and VAS. Results: Twenty-two participants were randomized to the treatments in the four periods of the study. The differences between treatments in FMPS reduction after brushing were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The differences were statistically significant between the U and P groups (difference −48; 95% CI from −54 to −41) favoring the P group, and between the U and H groups (difference −45; 95% CI from −52 to −39) favoring the H group. On the contrary, the difference between the U and N groups was not significant (difference 5; 95% CI from −2 to 12) favoring the U group. The differences between treatments in clean mouth VAS was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) favoring the P and H groups. Conclusions: The U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush tested in this study proved to be not effective in removing dental plaque. MDPI 2020-06-28 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7370079/ /pubmed/32605239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134649 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nieri, Michele Giuntini, Veronica Pagliaro, Umberto Giani, Monica Franchi, Lorenzo Franceschi, Debora Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | efficacy of a u-shaped automatic electric toothbrush in dental plaque removal: a cross-over randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32605239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134649 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nierimichele efficacyofaushapedautomaticelectrictoothbrushindentalplaqueremovalacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT giuntiniveronica efficacyofaushapedautomaticelectrictoothbrushindentalplaqueremovalacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pagliaroumberto efficacyofaushapedautomaticelectrictoothbrushindentalplaqueremovalacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gianimonica efficacyofaushapedautomaticelectrictoothbrushindentalplaqueremovalacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT franchilorenzo efficacyofaushapedautomaticelectrictoothbrushindentalplaqueremovalacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT franceschidebora efficacyofaushapedautomaticelectrictoothbrushindentalplaqueremovalacrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrial |