Cargando…
Exploring young people’s interpretations of female genital mutilation in the UK using a community-based participatory research approach
BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a deeply-rooted cultural practice mainly undertaken in Africa, the Middle East and Asian countries. Evidence to date suggests that although first-generation migrants to the West are abandoning FGM, the custom continues in some places, albeit in small nu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32689963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09183-6 |
_version_ | 1783560974862647296 |
---|---|
author | Ali, Saadye de Viggiani, Nick Abzhaparova, Aida Salmon, Debra Gray, Selena |
author_facet | Ali, Saadye de Viggiani, Nick Abzhaparova, Aida Salmon, Debra Gray, Selena |
author_sort | Ali, Saadye |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a deeply-rooted cultural practice mainly undertaken in Africa, the Middle East and Asian countries. Evidence to date suggests that although first-generation migrants to the West are abandoning FGM, the custom continues in some places, albeit in small numbers. This study examined how young people living in FGM affected communities in the United Kingdom (UK), interpreted and explained FGM. METHODS: A community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach was used to recruit and train nine young people aged 15–18 as co-researchers. These comprised eight females and one male from second-generation FGM affected communities, living in Bristol. The co-researchers then undertook focus groups and semi-structured interviews with twenty participants aged 13–15 living in Bristol, Cardiff and Milton Keynes. The qualitative data from the training workshops, interviews and focus groups were collected and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: There were conflicting views among participants. Some perceived FGM as a historical tradition that was of very little, if any, relevance to them. In contrast, others perceived that the more archaic, cultural interpretation of FGM, more commonly shared by older generations, had been supplanted by a new form of FGM, which they believed to be a safe procedure, made so by the availability of highly-trained, qualified doctors and better equipment in the UK. Participants spoke of challenges encountered when attempting to raise the issue of FGM with parents. Nevertheless, they acknowledged that– being born and raised in the UK – enabled them to talk openly and to challenge others. CONCLUSION: Future strategies to address and prevent FGM in the UK will require a public health approach that is holistic, intersectional and empowering. Such measures should be relevant to young people born and raised in the UK who interpret FGM differently to previous first-generation migrant relatives and communities. Tackling FGM requires a shift away from a principal preoccupation with harm reduction and criminalisation towards collaboration and active dialogue with communities, in positive and productive ways that acknowledge and engage issues of identity, race, gender, and generation, enabling people affected by FGM to take control of their health and well-being. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7370427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73704272020-07-21 Exploring young people’s interpretations of female genital mutilation in the UK using a community-based participatory research approach Ali, Saadye de Viggiani, Nick Abzhaparova, Aida Salmon, Debra Gray, Selena BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a deeply-rooted cultural practice mainly undertaken in Africa, the Middle East and Asian countries. Evidence to date suggests that although first-generation migrants to the West are abandoning FGM, the custom continues in some places, albeit in small numbers. This study examined how young people living in FGM affected communities in the United Kingdom (UK), interpreted and explained FGM. METHODS: A community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach was used to recruit and train nine young people aged 15–18 as co-researchers. These comprised eight females and one male from second-generation FGM affected communities, living in Bristol. The co-researchers then undertook focus groups and semi-structured interviews with twenty participants aged 13–15 living in Bristol, Cardiff and Milton Keynes. The qualitative data from the training workshops, interviews and focus groups were collected and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: There were conflicting views among participants. Some perceived FGM as a historical tradition that was of very little, if any, relevance to them. In contrast, others perceived that the more archaic, cultural interpretation of FGM, more commonly shared by older generations, had been supplanted by a new form of FGM, which they believed to be a safe procedure, made so by the availability of highly-trained, qualified doctors and better equipment in the UK. Participants spoke of challenges encountered when attempting to raise the issue of FGM with parents. Nevertheless, they acknowledged that– being born and raised in the UK – enabled them to talk openly and to challenge others. CONCLUSION: Future strategies to address and prevent FGM in the UK will require a public health approach that is holistic, intersectional and empowering. Such measures should be relevant to young people born and raised in the UK who interpret FGM differently to previous first-generation migrant relatives and communities. Tackling FGM requires a shift away from a principal preoccupation with harm reduction and criminalisation towards collaboration and active dialogue with communities, in positive and productive ways that acknowledge and engage issues of identity, race, gender, and generation, enabling people affected by FGM to take control of their health and well-being. BioMed Central 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7370427/ /pubmed/32689963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09183-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ali, Saadye de Viggiani, Nick Abzhaparova, Aida Salmon, Debra Gray, Selena Exploring young people’s interpretations of female genital mutilation in the UK using a community-based participatory research approach |
title | Exploring young people’s interpretations of female genital mutilation in the UK using a community-based participatory research approach |
title_full | Exploring young people’s interpretations of female genital mutilation in the UK using a community-based participatory research approach |
title_fullStr | Exploring young people’s interpretations of female genital mutilation in the UK using a community-based participatory research approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring young people’s interpretations of female genital mutilation in the UK using a community-based participatory research approach |
title_short | Exploring young people’s interpretations of female genital mutilation in the UK using a community-based participatory research approach |
title_sort | exploring young people’s interpretations of female genital mutilation in the uk using a community-based participatory research approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32689963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09183-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alisaadye exploringyoungpeoplesinterpretationsoffemalegenitalmutilationintheukusingacommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchapproach AT deviggianinick exploringyoungpeoplesinterpretationsoffemalegenitalmutilationintheukusingacommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchapproach AT abzhaparovaaida exploringyoungpeoplesinterpretationsoffemalegenitalmutilationintheukusingacommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchapproach AT salmondebra exploringyoungpeoplesinterpretationsoffemalegenitalmutilationintheukusingacommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchapproach AT grayselena exploringyoungpeoplesinterpretationsoffemalegenitalmutilationintheukusingacommunitybasedparticipatoryresearchapproach |