Cargando…

Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge of the Cardiovascular Effects of Diabetes Medications: Findings from an Online Survey

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular (CV) outcomes trial (CVOT) results have led to changes in indications for some glucose-lowering agents, with recommendations based on the presence of comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand internal medicine (IM) and family medicine (FM) physicians’ know...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shubrook, Jay H., Pak, Jonathan, Dailey, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32621271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01405-y
_version_ 1783561065373630464
author Shubrook, Jay H.
Pak, Jonathan
Dailey, George
author_facet Shubrook, Jay H.
Pak, Jonathan
Dailey, George
author_sort Shubrook, Jay H.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular (CV) outcomes trial (CVOT) results have led to changes in indications for some glucose-lowering agents, with recommendations based on the presence of comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand internal medicine (IM) and family medicine (FM) physicians’ knowledge of CVOTs and beliefs about type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) medications, excluding insulin, for CV disease risk reduction. METHODS: WebMD, LLC, fielded a 23-item online survey from September 18 to 20, 2018, to 47,534 Medscape members (US IM and FM physicians) who were invited to participate via e-mail (quota = 500). RESULTS: Of the 702 physicians who responded, 503 were eligible and completed the survey. Overall, 39% of respondents were not familiar with the 2018 American Diabetes Association treatment recommendations for those with T2DM and atherosclerotic CV disease. Respondents reported they were most familiar with TECOS (42%), LEADER (39%), EMPA-REG OUTCOME (33%), and CANVAS (30%). Many respondents did not know which CVOT showed superiority for major adverse CV events (26%) or CV mortality (31%). When provided with a list of seven treatment priorities, 33% of respondents ranked using T2DM medications with CV benefits as least important. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this 2018 survey suggest that there are knowledge gaps among IM and FM physicians regarding the results from CVOTs, with implications for the treatment of patients with T2DM and CV disease. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7370970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73709702020-07-22 Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge of the Cardiovascular Effects of Diabetes Medications: Findings from an Online Survey Shubrook, Jay H. Pak, Jonathan Dailey, George Adv Ther Brief Report INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular (CV) outcomes trial (CVOT) results have led to changes in indications for some glucose-lowering agents, with recommendations based on the presence of comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand internal medicine (IM) and family medicine (FM) physicians’ knowledge of CVOTs and beliefs about type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) medications, excluding insulin, for CV disease risk reduction. METHODS: WebMD, LLC, fielded a 23-item online survey from September 18 to 20, 2018, to 47,534 Medscape members (US IM and FM physicians) who were invited to participate via e-mail (quota = 500). RESULTS: Of the 702 physicians who responded, 503 were eligible and completed the survey. Overall, 39% of respondents were not familiar with the 2018 American Diabetes Association treatment recommendations for those with T2DM and atherosclerotic CV disease. Respondents reported they were most familiar with TECOS (42%), LEADER (39%), EMPA-REG OUTCOME (33%), and CANVAS (30%). Many respondents did not know which CVOT showed superiority for major adverse CV events (26%) or CV mortality (31%). When provided with a list of seven treatment priorities, 33% of respondents ranked using T2DM medications with CV benefits as least important. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this 2018 survey suggest that there are knowledge gaps among IM and FM physicians regarding the results from CVOTs, with implications for the treatment of patients with T2DM and CV disease. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer Healthcare 2020-07-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7370970/ /pubmed/32621271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01405-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Shubrook, Jay H.
Pak, Jonathan
Dailey, George
Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge of the Cardiovascular Effects of Diabetes Medications: Findings from an Online Survey
title Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge of the Cardiovascular Effects of Diabetes Medications: Findings from an Online Survey
title_full Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge of the Cardiovascular Effects of Diabetes Medications: Findings from an Online Survey
title_fullStr Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge of the Cardiovascular Effects of Diabetes Medications: Findings from an Online Survey
title_full_unstemmed Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge of the Cardiovascular Effects of Diabetes Medications: Findings from an Online Survey
title_short Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge of the Cardiovascular Effects of Diabetes Medications: Findings from an Online Survey
title_sort primary care physicians’ knowledge of the cardiovascular effects of diabetes medications: findings from an online survey
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7370970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32621271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01405-y
work_keys_str_mv AT shubrookjayh primarycarephysiciansknowledgeofthecardiovasculareffectsofdiabetesmedicationsfindingsfromanonlinesurvey
AT pakjonathan primarycarephysiciansknowledgeofthecardiovasculareffectsofdiabetesmedicationsfindingsfromanonlinesurvey
AT daileygeorge primarycarephysiciansknowledgeofthecardiovasculareffectsofdiabetesmedicationsfindingsfromanonlinesurvey