Cargando…
The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components
BACKGROUND: Lewinnek’s recommendation for orienting the cup in THA is criticized because it involves a static assessment of the safe zone and because it does not consider stem geometry. A revised concept of the safe zone should consider those factors, but to our knowledge, this has not been assessed...
Autor principal: | Widmer, Karl-Heinz |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32732575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001233 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Dynamic evaluation of THA components by Prosthesis Impingement Software (PIS)
por: Giachino, Matteo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Dual mobility acetabular components for revision THA
por: Cross, Michael B.
Publicado: (2015) -
Implant loosening following THA with S-ROM prosthesis and subtrochanteric osteotomy: Three case reports
por: Ma, Yingkai, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
A Modeling Study of a Patient-specific Safe Zone for THA: Calculation, Validation, and Key Factors Based on Standing and Sitting Sagittal Pelvic Tilt
por: Tang, Hao, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The role of the femoral component orientation on dislocations in THA: a systematic review
por: van Erp, Joost H. J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)