Cargando…

Effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners

Previous cochlear implant (CI) research has shown that at a pulse train with a long pulse phase duration (PPD) requires less current but greater charge to obtain the same loudness as a pulse train with a short PPD. This might result in different excitation patterns between long and short PPDs. At eq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Ning, Zhu, Zhen, Dong, Lixue, Galvin, John J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32687516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236179
_version_ 1783561093730271232
author Zhou, Ning
Zhu, Zhen
Dong, Lixue
Galvin, John J.
author_facet Zhou, Ning
Zhu, Zhen
Dong, Lixue
Galvin, John J.
author_sort Zhou, Ning
collection PubMed
description Previous cochlear implant (CI) research has shown that at a pulse train with a long pulse phase duration (PPD) requires less current but greater charge to obtain the same loudness as a pulse train with a short PPD. This might result in different excitation patterns between long and short PPDs. At equal loudness, long PPDs might produce greater masking due to greater charge. However, because they require less current, long PPDs may produce a smaller spatial spread of excitation (SOE) compared to short PPDs by evoking a greater neural firing probability within the relatively small current field. To investigate the effects of PPD on excitation patterns, overall masking and SOE were compared for equally loud stimuli with short or long PPD in 10 adult CI ears. Forward masking patterns were measured at relatively soft, medium, and loud presentation levels. Threshold shifts were calculated in terms of percent dynamic range (DR) of the probe. The area under the curve (AUC) of the masking functions was significantly larger for the long PPD than for the short PPD masker. The difference in AUC was proportional to the difference in charge between the short and long PPD maskers. To estimate SOE, the masking patterns were first normalized to the peak masking, and then AUC was calculated. SOE was significantly larger for the short PPD than for the long PPD masker. Thus, at equal loudness, long PPDs produced greater overall masking (possibly due to greater charge) but less SOE (possibly due to less current spread) than did short PPDs. The effect of the interaction between masking and SOE by long PPD stimulation remains to be tested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7371170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73711702020-07-29 Effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners Zhou, Ning Zhu, Zhen Dong, Lixue Galvin, John J. PLoS One Research Article Previous cochlear implant (CI) research has shown that at a pulse train with a long pulse phase duration (PPD) requires less current but greater charge to obtain the same loudness as a pulse train with a short PPD. This might result in different excitation patterns between long and short PPDs. At equal loudness, long PPDs might produce greater masking due to greater charge. However, because they require less current, long PPDs may produce a smaller spatial spread of excitation (SOE) compared to short PPDs by evoking a greater neural firing probability within the relatively small current field. To investigate the effects of PPD on excitation patterns, overall masking and SOE were compared for equally loud stimuli with short or long PPD in 10 adult CI ears. Forward masking patterns were measured at relatively soft, medium, and loud presentation levels. Threshold shifts were calculated in terms of percent dynamic range (DR) of the probe. The area under the curve (AUC) of the masking functions was significantly larger for the long PPD than for the short PPD masker. The difference in AUC was proportional to the difference in charge between the short and long PPD maskers. To estimate SOE, the masking patterns were first normalized to the peak masking, and then AUC was calculated. SOE was significantly larger for the short PPD than for the long PPD masker. Thus, at equal loudness, long PPDs produced greater overall masking (possibly due to greater charge) but less SOE (possibly due to less current spread) than did short PPDs. The effect of the interaction between masking and SOE by long PPD stimulation remains to be tested. Public Library of Science 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7371170/ /pubmed/32687516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236179 Text en © 2020 Zhou et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhou, Ning
Zhu, Zhen
Dong, Lixue
Galvin, John J.
Effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners
title Effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners
title_full Effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners
title_fullStr Effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners
title_full_unstemmed Effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners
title_short Effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners
title_sort effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32687516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236179
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouning effectofpulsephasedurationonforwardmaskingandspreadofexcitationincochlearimplantlisteners
AT zhuzhen effectofpulsephasedurationonforwardmaskingandspreadofexcitationincochlearimplantlisteners
AT donglixue effectofpulsephasedurationonforwardmaskingandspreadofexcitationincochlearimplantlisteners
AT galvinjohnj effectofpulsephasedurationonforwardmaskingandspreadofexcitationincochlearimplantlisteners