Cargando…

Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta

BACKGROUND: The use of multisource feedback (MSF) for assessing physician performance is widespread and rapidly growing. Findings from early very small research studies using highly selected participants suggest high levels of satisfaction and support. However, after nearly two decades of experience...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashworth, Nigel, Kain, Nicole Allison, Jess, Ed, Mazurek, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32690531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037610
_version_ 1783561104464543744
author Ashworth, Nigel
Kain, Nicole Allison
Jess, Ed
Mazurek, Karen
author_facet Ashworth, Nigel
Kain, Nicole Allison
Jess, Ed
Mazurek, Karen
author_sort Ashworth, Nigel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of multisource feedback (MSF) for assessing physician performance is widespread and rapidly growing. Findings from early very small research studies using highly selected participants suggest high levels of satisfaction and support. However, after nearly two decades of experience using MSF to evaluate all physicians in Alberta, we are sceptical of this. OBJECTIVES: To determine physicians’ actual opinions of MSF using the entire physician population of Alberta, Canada DESIGN: Online survey. SETTING: Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All physicians with a full licence to practice in Alberta in 2015. INTERVENTIONS: All participants were asked to grade how well they thought MSF was at assessing various aspects of physician performance using a 10-point Likert-type scale. There was also a text response field for written comments. OUTCOMES: Mean responses to quantitative questions. Qualitative content and thematic analysis of open-ended text responses. We analysed the data using SPSS V.23 and NVivo V.11 and built a multivariate model highlighting the predictors of high and low opinions of MSF. RESULTS: Survey response rate was high for physicians with 2215 responses (25%). The mean rating for how successful MSF was at assessing a variety of dimensions, varied from a low of 5.03/10 for medical knowledge to a high of 6.38/10 for professionalism and communication. Canadian-trained MDs rated MSF significantly lower on every dimension by approximately 20% compared with non-Canadian-trained MDs. CONCLUSIONS: Alberta physicians have much lower opinions about the ability of MSF to measure any dimension of their performance than what has been suggested in the literature. Canadian-trained MDs have a particularly low opinion of MSF for reasons that remain unclear. The results of this survey offer a serious challenge to the effectiveness of a programme that is designed to promote self-reflection and performance improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7371216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73712162020-07-22 Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta Ashworth, Nigel Kain, Nicole Allison Jess, Ed Mazurek, Karen BMJ Open Medical Education and Training BACKGROUND: The use of multisource feedback (MSF) for assessing physician performance is widespread and rapidly growing. Findings from early very small research studies using highly selected participants suggest high levels of satisfaction and support. However, after nearly two decades of experience using MSF to evaluate all physicians in Alberta, we are sceptical of this. OBJECTIVES: To determine physicians’ actual opinions of MSF using the entire physician population of Alberta, Canada DESIGN: Online survey. SETTING: Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All physicians with a full licence to practice in Alberta in 2015. INTERVENTIONS: All participants were asked to grade how well they thought MSF was at assessing various aspects of physician performance using a 10-point Likert-type scale. There was also a text response field for written comments. OUTCOMES: Mean responses to quantitative questions. Qualitative content and thematic analysis of open-ended text responses. We analysed the data using SPSS V.23 and NVivo V.11 and built a multivariate model highlighting the predictors of high and low opinions of MSF. RESULTS: Survey response rate was high for physicians with 2215 responses (25%). The mean rating for how successful MSF was at assessing a variety of dimensions, varied from a low of 5.03/10 for medical knowledge to a high of 6.38/10 for professionalism and communication. Canadian-trained MDs rated MSF significantly lower on every dimension by approximately 20% compared with non-Canadian-trained MDs. CONCLUSIONS: Alberta physicians have much lower opinions about the ability of MSF to measure any dimension of their performance than what has been suggested in the literature. Canadian-trained MDs have a particularly low opinion of MSF for reasons that remain unclear. The results of this survey offer a serious challenge to the effectiveness of a programme that is designed to promote self-reflection and performance improvement. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7371216/ /pubmed/32690531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037610 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Ashworth, Nigel
Kain, Nicole Allison
Jess, Ed
Mazurek, Karen
Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta
title Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta
title_full Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta
title_fullStr Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta
title_full_unstemmed Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta
title_short Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta
title_sort survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in alberta
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32690531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037610
work_keys_str_mv AT ashworthnigel surveyofphysicianattitudestousingmultisourcefeedbackforcompetenceassessmentinalberta
AT kainnicoleallison surveyofphysicianattitudestousingmultisourcefeedbackforcompetenceassessmentinalberta
AT jessed surveyofphysicianattitudestousingmultisourcefeedbackforcompetenceassessmentinalberta
AT mazurekkaren surveyofphysicianattitudestousingmultisourcefeedbackforcompetenceassessmentinalberta