Cargando…
Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta
BACKGROUND: The use of multisource feedback (MSF) for assessing physician performance is widespread and rapidly growing. Findings from early very small research studies using highly selected participants suggest high levels of satisfaction and support. However, after nearly two decades of experience...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32690531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037610 |
_version_ | 1783561104464543744 |
---|---|
author | Ashworth, Nigel Kain, Nicole Allison Jess, Ed Mazurek, Karen |
author_facet | Ashworth, Nigel Kain, Nicole Allison Jess, Ed Mazurek, Karen |
author_sort | Ashworth, Nigel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of multisource feedback (MSF) for assessing physician performance is widespread and rapidly growing. Findings from early very small research studies using highly selected participants suggest high levels of satisfaction and support. However, after nearly two decades of experience using MSF to evaluate all physicians in Alberta, we are sceptical of this. OBJECTIVES: To determine physicians’ actual opinions of MSF using the entire physician population of Alberta, Canada DESIGN: Online survey. SETTING: Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All physicians with a full licence to practice in Alberta in 2015. INTERVENTIONS: All participants were asked to grade how well they thought MSF was at assessing various aspects of physician performance using a 10-point Likert-type scale. There was also a text response field for written comments. OUTCOMES: Mean responses to quantitative questions. Qualitative content and thematic analysis of open-ended text responses. We analysed the data using SPSS V.23 and NVivo V.11 and built a multivariate model highlighting the predictors of high and low opinions of MSF. RESULTS: Survey response rate was high for physicians with 2215 responses (25%). The mean rating for how successful MSF was at assessing a variety of dimensions, varied from a low of 5.03/10 for medical knowledge to a high of 6.38/10 for professionalism and communication. Canadian-trained MDs rated MSF significantly lower on every dimension by approximately 20% compared with non-Canadian-trained MDs. CONCLUSIONS: Alberta physicians have much lower opinions about the ability of MSF to measure any dimension of their performance than what has been suggested in the literature. Canadian-trained MDs have a particularly low opinion of MSF for reasons that remain unclear. The results of this survey offer a serious challenge to the effectiveness of a programme that is designed to promote self-reflection and performance improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7371216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73712162020-07-22 Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta Ashworth, Nigel Kain, Nicole Allison Jess, Ed Mazurek, Karen BMJ Open Medical Education and Training BACKGROUND: The use of multisource feedback (MSF) for assessing physician performance is widespread and rapidly growing. Findings from early very small research studies using highly selected participants suggest high levels of satisfaction and support. However, after nearly two decades of experience using MSF to evaluate all physicians in Alberta, we are sceptical of this. OBJECTIVES: To determine physicians’ actual opinions of MSF using the entire physician population of Alberta, Canada DESIGN: Online survey. SETTING: Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All physicians with a full licence to practice in Alberta in 2015. INTERVENTIONS: All participants were asked to grade how well they thought MSF was at assessing various aspects of physician performance using a 10-point Likert-type scale. There was also a text response field for written comments. OUTCOMES: Mean responses to quantitative questions. Qualitative content and thematic analysis of open-ended text responses. We analysed the data using SPSS V.23 and NVivo V.11 and built a multivariate model highlighting the predictors of high and low opinions of MSF. RESULTS: Survey response rate was high for physicians with 2215 responses (25%). The mean rating for how successful MSF was at assessing a variety of dimensions, varied from a low of 5.03/10 for medical knowledge to a high of 6.38/10 for professionalism and communication. Canadian-trained MDs rated MSF significantly lower on every dimension by approximately 20% compared with non-Canadian-trained MDs. CONCLUSIONS: Alberta physicians have much lower opinions about the ability of MSF to measure any dimension of their performance than what has been suggested in the literature. Canadian-trained MDs have a particularly low opinion of MSF for reasons that remain unclear. The results of this survey offer a serious challenge to the effectiveness of a programme that is designed to promote self-reflection and performance improvement. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7371216/ /pubmed/32690531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037610 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education and Training Ashworth, Nigel Kain, Nicole Allison Jess, Ed Mazurek, Karen Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta |
title | Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta |
title_full | Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta |
title_fullStr | Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta |
title_full_unstemmed | Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta |
title_short | Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta |
title_sort | survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in alberta |
topic | Medical Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32690531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ashworthnigel surveyofphysicianattitudestousingmultisourcefeedbackforcompetenceassessmentinalberta AT kainnicoleallison surveyofphysicianattitudestousingmultisourcefeedbackforcompetenceassessmentinalberta AT jessed surveyofphysicianattitudestousingmultisourcefeedbackforcompetenceassessmentinalberta AT mazurekkaren surveyofphysicianattitudestousingmultisourcefeedbackforcompetenceassessmentinalberta |