Cargando…

Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Advances in wearable sensor technology now enable frequent, objective monitoring of real-world walking. Walking-related digital mobility outcomes (DMOs), such as real-world walking speed, have the potential to be more sensitive to mobility changes than traditional clinical assessments....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polhemus, Ashley Marie, Bergquist, Ronny, Bosch de Basea, Magda, Brittain, Gavin, Buttery, Sara Catherine, Chynkiamis, Nikolaos, dalla Costa, Gloria, Delgado Ortiz, Laura, Demeyer, Heleen, Emmert, Kirsten, Garcia Aymerich, Judith, Gassner, Heiko, Hansen, Clint, Hopkinson, Nicholas, Klucken, Jochen, Kluge, Felix, Koch, Sarah, Leocani, Letizia, Maetzler, Walter, Micó-Amigo, M Encarna, Mikolaizak, A Stefanie, Piraino, Paolo, Salis, Francesca, Schlenstedt, Christian, Schwickert, Lars, Scott, Kirsty, Sharrack, Basil, Taraldsen, Kristin, Troosters, Thierry, Vereijken, Beatrix, Vogiatzis, Ioannis, Yarnall, Alison, Mazza, Claudia, Becker, Clemens, Rochester, Lynn, Puhan, Milo Alan, Frei, Anja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32690539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038704
_version_ 1783561106247122944
author Polhemus, Ashley Marie
Bergquist, Ronny
Bosch de Basea, Magda
Brittain, Gavin
Buttery, Sara Catherine
Chynkiamis, Nikolaos
dalla Costa, Gloria
Delgado Ortiz, Laura
Demeyer, Heleen
Emmert, Kirsten
Garcia Aymerich, Judith
Gassner, Heiko
Hansen, Clint
Hopkinson, Nicholas
Klucken, Jochen
Kluge, Felix
Koch, Sarah
Leocani, Letizia
Maetzler, Walter
Micó-Amigo, M Encarna
Mikolaizak, A Stefanie
Piraino, Paolo
Salis, Francesca
Schlenstedt, Christian
Schwickert, Lars
Scott, Kirsty
Sharrack, Basil
Taraldsen, Kristin
Troosters, Thierry
Vereijken, Beatrix
Vogiatzis, Ioannis
Yarnall, Alison
Mazza, Claudia
Becker, Clemens
Rochester, Lynn
Puhan, Milo Alan
Frei, Anja
author_facet Polhemus, Ashley Marie
Bergquist, Ronny
Bosch de Basea, Magda
Brittain, Gavin
Buttery, Sara Catherine
Chynkiamis, Nikolaos
dalla Costa, Gloria
Delgado Ortiz, Laura
Demeyer, Heleen
Emmert, Kirsten
Garcia Aymerich, Judith
Gassner, Heiko
Hansen, Clint
Hopkinson, Nicholas
Klucken, Jochen
Kluge, Felix
Koch, Sarah
Leocani, Letizia
Maetzler, Walter
Micó-Amigo, M Encarna
Mikolaizak, A Stefanie
Piraino, Paolo
Salis, Francesca
Schlenstedt, Christian
Schwickert, Lars
Scott, Kirsty
Sharrack, Basil
Taraldsen, Kristin
Troosters, Thierry
Vereijken, Beatrix
Vogiatzis, Ioannis
Yarnall, Alison
Mazza, Claudia
Becker, Clemens
Rochester, Lynn
Puhan, Milo Alan
Frei, Anja
author_sort Polhemus, Ashley Marie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Advances in wearable sensor technology now enable frequent, objective monitoring of real-world walking. Walking-related digital mobility outcomes (DMOs), such as real-world walking speed, have the potential to be more sensitive to mobility changes than traditional clinical assessments. However, it is not yet clear which DMOs are most suitable for formal validation. In this review, we will explore the evidence on discriminant ability, construct validity, prognostic value and responsiveness of walking-related DMOs in four disease areas: Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and proximal femoral fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework for scoping reviews will guide study conduct. We will search seven databases (Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, IEEE Digital Library and Cochrane Library) and grey literature for studies which (1) measure differences in DMOs between healthy and pathological walking, (2) assess relationships between DMOs and traditional clinical measures, (3) assess the prognostic value of DMOs and (4) use DMOs as endpoints in interventional clinical trials. Two reviewers will screen each abstract and full-text manuscript according to predefined eligibility criteria. We will then chart extracted data, map the literature, perform a narrative synthesis and identify gaps. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this review is limited to publicly available materials, it does not require ethical approval. This work is part of Mobilise-D, an Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking which aims to deliver, validate and obtain regulatory approval for DMOs. Results will be shared with the scientific community and general public in cooperation with the Mobilise-D communication team. REGISTRATION: Study materials and updates will be made available through the Center for Open Science’s OSFRegistry (https://osf.io/k7395).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7371223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73712232020-07-22 Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review Polhemus, Ashley Marie Bergquist, Ronny Bosch de Basea, Magda Brittain, Gavin Buttery, Sara Catherine Chynkiamis, Nikolaos dalla Costa, Gloria Delgado Ortiz, Laura Demeyer, Heleen Emmert, Kirsten Garcia Aymerich, Judith Gassner, Heiko Hansen, Clint Hopkinson, Nicholas Klucken, Jochen Kluge, Felix Koch, Sarah Leocani, Letizia Maetzler, Walter Micó-Amigo, M Encarna Mikolaizak, A Stefanie Piraino, Paolo Salis, Francesca Schlenstedt, Christian Schwickert, Lars Scott, Kirsty Sharrack, Basil Taraldsen, Kristin Troosters, Thierry Vereijken, Beatrix Vogiatzis, Ioannis Yarnall, Alison Mazza, Claudia Becker, Clemens Rochester, Lynn Puhan, Milo Alan Frei, Anja BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Advances in wearable sensor technology now enable frequent, objective monitoring of real-world walking. Walking-related digital mobility outcomes (DMOs), such as real-world walking speed, have the potential to be more sensitive to mobility changes than traditional clinical assessments. However, it is not yet clear which DMOs are most suitable for formal validation. In this review, we will explore the evidence on discriminant ability, construct validity, prognostic value and responsiveness of walking-related DMOs in four disease areas: Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and proximal femoral fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework for scoping reviews will guide study conduct. We will search seven databases (Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, IEEE Digital Library and Cochrane Library) and grey literature for studies which (1) measure differences in DMOs between healthy and pathological walking, (2) assess relationships between DMOs and traditional clinical measures, (3) assess the prognostic value of DMOs and (4) use DMOs as endpoints in interventional clinical trials. Two reviewers will screen each abstract and full-text manuscript according to predefined eligibility criteria. We will then chart extracted data, map the literature, perform a narrative synthesis and identify gaps. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this review is limited to publicly available materials, it does not require ethical approval. This work is part of Mobilise-D, an Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking which aims to deliver, validate and obtain regulatory approval for DMOs. Results will be shared with the scientific community and general public in cooperation with the Mobilise-D communication team. REGISTRATION: Study materials and updates will be made available through the Center for Open Science’s OSFRegistry (https://osf.io/k7395). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7371223/ /pubmed/32690539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038704 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Polhemus, Ashley Marie
Bergquist, Ronny
Bosch de Basea, Magda
Brittain, Gavin
Buttery, Sara Catherine
Chynkiamis, Nikolaos
dalla Costa, Gloria
Delgado Ortiz, Laura
Demeyer, Heleen
Emmert, Kirsten
Garcia Aymerich, Judith
Gassner, Heiko
Hansen, Clint
Hopkinson, Nicholas
Klucken, Jochen
Kluge, Felix
Koch, Sarah
Leocani, Letizia
Maetzler, Walter
Micó-Amigo, M Encarna
Mikolaizak, A Stefanie
Piraino, Paolo
Salis, Francesca
Schlenstedt, Christian
Schwickert, Lars
Scott, Kirsty
Sharrack, Basil
Taraldsen, Kristin
Troosters, Thierry
Vereijken, Beatrix
Vogiatzis, Ioannis
Yarnall, Alison
Mazza, Claudia
Becker, Clemens
Rochester, Lynn
Puhan, Milo Alan
Frei, Anja
Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review
title Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review
title_full Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review
title_fullStr Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review
title_short Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review
title_sort walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32690539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038704
work_keys_str_mv AT polhemusashleymarie walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT bergquistronny walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT boschdebaseamagda walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT brittaingavin walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT butterysaracatherine walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT chynkiamisnikolaos walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT dallacostagloria walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT delgadoortizlaura walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT demeyerheleen walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT emmertkirsten walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT garciaaymerichjudith walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT gassnerheiko walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT hansenclint walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT hopkinsonnicholas walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT kluckenjochen walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT klugefelix walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT kochsarah walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT leocaniletizia walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT maetzlerwalter walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT micoamigomencarna walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT mikolaizakastefanie walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT pirainopaolo walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT salisfrancesca walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT schlenstedtchristian walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT schwickertlars walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT scottkirsty walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT sharrackbasil walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT taraldsenkristin walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT troostersthierry walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT vereijkenbeatrix walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT vogiatzisioannis walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT yarnallalison walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT mazzaclaudia walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT beckerclemens walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT rochesterlynn walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT puhanmiloalan walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview
AT freianja walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview