Cargando…
Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review
INTRODUCTION: Advances in wearable sensor technology now enable frequent, objective monitoring of real-world walking. Walking-related digital mobility outcomes (DMOs), such as real-world walking speed, have the potential to be more sensitive to mobility changes than traditional clinical assessments....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32690539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038704 |
_version_ | 1783561106247122944 |
---|---|
author | Polhemus, Ashley Marie Bergquist, Ronny Bosch de Basea, Magda Brittain, Gavin Buttery, Sara Catherine Chynkiamis, Nikolaos dalla Costa, Gloria Delgado Ortiz, Laura Demeyer, Heleen Emmert, Kirsten Garcia Aymerich, Judith Gassner, Heiko Hansen, Clint Hopkinson, Nicholas Klucken, Jochen Kluge, Felix Koch, Sarah Leocani, Letizia Maetzler, Walter Micó-Amigo, M Encarna Mikolaizak, A Stefanie Piraino, Paolo Salis, Francesca Schlenstedt, Christian Schwickert, Lars Scott, Kirsty Sharrack, Basil Taraldsen, Kristin Troosters, Thierry Vereijken, Beatrix Vogiatzis, Ioannis Yarnall, Alison Mazza, Claudia Becker, Clemens Rochester, Lynn Puhan, Milo Alan Frei, Anja |
author_facet | Polhemus, Ashley Marie Bergquist, Ronny Bosch de Basea, Magda Brittain, Gavin Buttery, Sara Catherine Chynkiamis, Nikolaos dalla Costa, Gloria Delgado Ortiz, Laura Demeyer, Heleen Emmert, Kirsten Garcia Aymerich, Judith Gassner, Heiko Hansen, Clint Hopkinson, Nicholas Klucken, Jochen Kluge, Felix Koch, Sarah Leocani, Letizia Maetzler, Walter Micó-Amigo, M Encarna Mikolaizak, A Stefanie Piraino, Paolo Salis, Francesca Schlenstedt, Christian Schwickert, Lars Scott, Kirsty Sharrack, Basil Taraldsen, Kristin Troosters, Thierry Vereijken, Beatrix Vogiatzis, Ioannis Yarnall, Alison Mazza, Claudia Becker, Clemens Rochester, Lynn Puhan, Milo Alan Frei, Anja |
author_sort | Polhemus, Ashley Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Advances in wearable sensor technology now enable frequent, objective monitoring of real-world walking. Walking-related digital mobility outcomes (DMOs), such as real-world walking speed, have the potential to be more sensitive to mobility changes than traditional clinical assessments. However, it is not yet clear which DMOs are most suitable for formal validation. In this review, we will explore the evidence on discriminant ability, construct validity, prognostic value and responsiveness of walking-related DMOs in four disease areas: Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and proximal femoral fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework for scoping reviews will guide study conduct. We will search seven databases (Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, IEEE Digital Library and Cochrane Library) and grey literature for studies which (1) measure differences in DMOs between healthy and pathological walking, (2) assess relationships between DMOs and traditional clinical measures, (3) assess the prognostic value of DMOs and (4) use DMOs as endpoints in interventional clinical trials. Two reviewers will screen each abstract and full-text manuscript according to predefined eligibility criteria. We will then chart extracted data, map the literature, perform a narrative synthesis and identify gaps. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this review is limited to publicly available materials, it does not require ethical approval. This work is part of Mobilise-D, an Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking which aims to deliver, validate and obtain regulatory approval for DMOs. Results will be shared with the scientific community and general public in cooperation with the Mobilise-D communication team. REGISTRATION: Study materials and updates will be made available through the Center for Open Science’s OSFRegistry (https://osf.io/k7395). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7371223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73712232020-07-22 Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review Polhemus, Ashley Marie Bergquist, Ronny Bosch de Basea, Magda Brittain, Gavin Buttery, Sara Catherine Chynkiamis, Nikolaos dalla Costa, Gloria Delgado Ortiz, Laura Demeyer, Heleen Emmert, Kirsten Garcia Aymerich, Judith Gassner, Heiko Hansen, Clint Hopkinson, Nicholas Klucken, Jochen Kluge, Felix Koch, Sarah Leocani, Letizia Maetzler, Walter Micó-Amigo, M Encarna Mikolaizak, A Stefanie Piraino, Paolo Salis, Francesca Schlenstedt, Christian Schwickert, Lars Scott, Kirsty Sharrack, Basil Taraldsen, Kristin Troosters, Thierry Vereijken, Beatrix Vogiatzis, Ioannis Yarnall, Alison Mazza, Claudia Becker, Clemens Rochester, Lynn Puhan, Milo Alan Frei, Anja BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Advances in wearable sensor technology now enable frequent, objective monitoring of real-world walking. Walking-related digital mobility outcomes (DMOs), such as real-world walking speed, have the potential to be more sensitive to mobility changes than traditional clinical assessments. However, it is not yet clear which DMOs are most suitable for formal validation. In this review, we will explore the evidence on discriminant ability, construct validity, prognostic value and responsiveness of walking-related DMOs in four disease areas: Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and proximal femoral fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework for scoping reviews will guide study conduct. We will search seven databases (Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, IEEE Digital Library and Cochrane Library) and grey literature for studies which (1) measure differences in DMOs between healthy and pathological walking, (2) assess relationships between DMOs and traditional clinical measures, (3) assess the prognostic value of DMOs and (4) use DMOs as endpoints in interventional clinical trials. Two reviewers will screen each abstract and full-text manuscript according to predefined eligibility criteria. We will then chart extracted data, map the literature, perform a narrative synthesis and identify gaps. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this review is limited to publicly available materials, it does not require ethical approval. This work is part of Mobilise-D, an Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking which aims to deliver, validate and obtain regulatory approval for DMOs. Results will be shared with the scientific community and general public in cooperation with the Mobilise-D communication team. REGISTRATION: Study materials and updates will be made available through the Center for Open Science’s OSFRegistry (https://osf.io/k7395). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7371223/ /pubmed/32690539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038704 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Polhemus, Ashley Marie Bergquist, Ronny Bosch de Basea, Magda Brittain, Gavin Buttery, Sara Catherine Chynkiamis, Nikolaos dalla Costa, Gloria Delgado Ortiz, Laura Demeyer, Heleen Emmert, Kirsten Garcia Aymerich, Judith Gassner, Heiko Hansen, Clint Hopkinson, Nicholas Klucken, Jochen Kluge, Felix Koch, Sarah Leocani, Letizia Maetzler, Walter Micó-Amigo, M Encarna Mikolaizak, A Stefanie Piraino, Paolo Salis, Francesca Schlenstedt, Christian Schwickert, Lars Scott, Kirsty Sharrack, Basil Taraldsen, Kristin Troosters, Thierry Vereijken, Beatrix Vogiatzis, Ioannis Yarnall, Alison Mazza, Claudia Becker, Clemens Rochester, Lynn Puhan, Milo Alan Frei, Anja Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review |
title | Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review |
title_full | Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review |
title_short | Walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review |
title_sort | walking-related digital mobility outcomes as clinical trial endpoint measures: protocol for a scoping review |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32690539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038704 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polhemusashleymarie walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT bergquistronny walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT boschdebaseamagda walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT brittaingavin walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT butterysaracatherine walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT chynkiamisnikolaos walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT dallacostagloria walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT delgadoortizlaura walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT demeyerheleen walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT emmertkirsten walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT garciaaymerichjudith walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT gassnerheiko walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT hansenclint walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT hopkinsonnicholas walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT kluckenjochen walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT klugefelix walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT kochsarah walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT leocaniletizia walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT maetzlerwalter walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT micoamigomencarna walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT mikolaizakastefanie walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT pirainopaolo walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT salisfrancesca walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT schlenstedtchristian walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT schwickertlars walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT scottkirsty walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT sharrackbasil walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT taraldsenkristin walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT troostersthierry walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT vereijkenbeatrix walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT vogiatzisioannis walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT yarnallalison walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT mazzaclaudia walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT beckerclemens walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT rochesterlynn walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT puhanmiloalan walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview AT freianja walkingrelateddigitalmobilityoutcomesasclinicaltrialendpointmeasuresprotocolforascopingreview |