Cargando…

Effects of breeding history and crop management on the root architecture of wheat

AIMS: Selection for optimal root system architecture (RSA) is important to ensure genetic gains in the sustainable production of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Here we examine the hypothesis that past wheat breeding has led to changes in RSA and that future breeding efforts can focus directly on RSA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fradgley, N., Evans, G., Biernaskie, J.M., Cockram, J., Marr, E.C., Oliver, A. G., Ober, E., Jones, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32713967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04585-2
_version_ 1783561152142245888
author Fradgley, N.
Evans, G.
Biernaskie, J.M.
Cockram, J.
Marr, E.C.
Oliver, A. G.
Ober, E.
Jones, H.
author_facet Fradgley, N.
Evans, G.
Biernaskie, J.M.
Cockram, J.
Marr, E.C.
Oliver, A. G.
Ober, E.
Jones, H.
author_sort Fradgley, N.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Selection for optimal root system architecture (RSA) is important to ensure genetic gains in the sustainable production of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Here we examine the hypothesis that past wheat breeding has led to changes in RSA and that future breeding efforts can focus directly on RSA to improve adaptation to target environments. METHODS: We conducted field trials using diverse wheat varieties, including modern and historic UK varieties and non-UK landraces, tested under contrasting tillage regimes (non-inversion tillage versus conventional ploughing) for two trial years or different seeding rates (standard versus high rate) for one trial year. We used field excavation, washing and measurement of root crowns (‘shovelomics’) to characterise RSA traits, including: numbers of seminal, crown and nodal roots per plant, and crown root growth angle. RESULTS: We found differences among genotypes for all root traits. Modern varieties generally had fewer roots per plant than historic varieties. On average, there were fewer crown roots and root angles were wider under shallow non-inversion tillage compared with conventional ploughing. Crown root numbers per plant also tended to be smaller at a high seeding rate compared with the standard. There were significant genotype-by-year, genotype-by-tillage and genotype-by-seeding-rate interactions for many root traits. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller root systems are likely to be a result of past selection that facilitated historical yield increases by reducing below-ground competition within the crop. The effects of crop management practices on RSA depend on genotype, suggesting that future breeding could select for improved RSA traits in resource-efficient farming systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11104-020-04585-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7371663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73716632020-07-22 Effects of breeding history and crop management on the root architecture of wheat Fradgley, N. Evans, G. Biernaskie, J.M. Cockram, J. Marr, E.C. Oliver, A. G. Ober, E. Jones, H. Plant Soil Regular Article AIMS: Selection for optimal root system architecture (RSA) is important to ensure genetic gains in the sustainable production of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Here we examine the hypothesis that past wheat breeding has led to changes in RSA and that future breeding efforts can focus directly on RSA to improve adaptation to target environments. METHODS: We conducted field trials using diverse wheat varieties, including modern and historic UK varieties and non-UK landraces, tested under contrasting tillage regimes (non-inversion tillage versus conventional ploughing) for two trial years or different seeding rates (standard versus high rate) for one trial year. We used field excavation, washing and measurement of root crowns (‘shovelomics’) to characterise RSA traits, including: numbers of seminal, crown and nodal roots per plant, and crown root growth angle. RESULTS: We found differences among genotypes for all root traits. Modern varieties generally had fewer roots per plant than historic varieties. On average, there were fewer crown roots and root angles were wider under shallow non-inversion tillage compared with conventional ploughing. Crown root numbers per plant also tended to be smaller at a high seeding rate compared with the standard. There were significant genotype-by-year, genotype-by-tillage and genotype-by-seeding-rate interactions for many root traits. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller root systems are likely to be a result of past selection that facilitated historical yield increases by reducing below-ground competition within the crop. The effects of crop management practices on RSA depend on genotype, suggesting that future breeding could select for improved RSA traits in resource-efficient farming systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11104-020-04585-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-06-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7371663/ /pubmed/32713967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04585-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Fradgley, N.
Evans, G.
Biernaskie, J.M.
Cockram, J.
Marr, E.C.
Oliver, A. G.
Ober, E.
Jones, H.
Effects of breeding history and crop management on the root architecture of wheat
title Effects of breeding history and crop management on the root architecture of wheat
title_full Effects of breeding history and crop management on the root architecture of wheat
title_fullStr Effects of breeding history and crop management on the root architecture of wheat
title_full_unstemmed Effects of breeding history and crop management on the root architecture of wheat
title_short Effects of breeding history and crop management on the root architecture of wheat
title_sort effects of breeding history and crop management on the root architecture of wheat
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32713967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04585-2
work_keys_str_mv AT fradgleyn effectsofbreedinghistoryandcropmanagementontherootarchitectureofwheat
AT evansg effectsofbreedinghistoryandcropmanagementontherootarchitectureofwheat
AT biernaskiejm effectsofbreedinghistoryandcropmanagementontherootarchitectureofwheat
AT cockramj effectsofbreedinghistoryandcropmanagementontherootarchitectureofwheat
AT marrec effectsofbreedinghistoryandcropmanagementontherootarchitectureofwheat
AT oliverag effectsofbreedinghistoryandcropmanagementontherootarchitectureofwheat
AT obere effectsofbreedinghistoryandcropmanagementontherootarchitectureofwheat
AT jonesh effectsofbreedinghistoryandcropmanagementontherootarchitectureofwheat