Cargando…
Early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine learning-based prediction models
Most screening tests for T2DM in use today were developed using multivariate regression methods that are often further simplified to allow transformation into a scoring formula. The increasing volume of electronically collected data opened the opportunity to develop more complex, accurate prediction...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32686721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68771-z |
_version_ | 1783561155619323904 |
---|---|
author | Kopitar, Leon Kocbek, Primoz Cilar, Leona Sheikh, Aziz Stiglic, Gregor |
author_facet | Kopitar, Leon Kocbek, Primoz Cilar, Leona Sheikh, Aziz Stiglic, Gregor |
author_sort | Kopitar, Leon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most screening tests for T2DM in use today were developed using multivariate regression methods that are often further simplified to allow transformation into a scoring formula. The increasing volume of electronically collected data opened the opportunity to develop more complex, accurate prediction models that can be continuously updated using machine learning approaches. This study compares machine learning-based prediction models (i.e. Glmnet, RF, XGBoost, LightGBM) to commonly used regression models for prediction of undiagnosed T2DM. The performance in prediction of fasting plasma glucose level was measured using 100 bootstrap iterations in different subsets of data simulating new incoming data in 6-month batches. With 6 months of data available, simple regression model performed with the lowest average RMSE of 0.838, followed by RF (0.842), LightGBM (0.846), Glmnet (0.859) and XGBoost (0.881). When more data were added, Glmnet improved with the highest rate (+ 3.4%). The highest level of variable selection stability over time was observed with LightGBM models. Our results show no clinically relevant improvement when more sophisticated prediction models were used. Since higher stability of selected variables over time contributes to simpler interpretation of the models, interpretability and model calibration should also be considered in development of clinical prediction models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7371679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73716792020-07-22 Early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine learning-based prediction models Kopitar, Leon Kocbek, Primoz Cilar, Leona Sheikh, Aziz Stiglic, Gregor Sci Rep Article Most screening tests for T2DM in use today were developed using multivariate regression methods that are often further simplified to allow transformation into a scoring formula. The increasing volume of electronically collected data opened the opportunity to develop more complex, accurate prediction models that can be continuously updated using machine learning approaches. This study compares machine learning-based prediction models (i.e. Glmnet, RF, XGBoost, LightGBM) to commonly used regression models for prediction of undiagnosed T2DM. The performance in prediction of fasting plasma glucose level was measured using 100 bootstrap iterations in different subsets of data simulating new incoming data in 6-month batches. With 6 months of data available, simple regression model performed with the lowest average RMSE of 0.838, followed by RF (0.842), LightGBM (0.846), Glmnet (0.859) and XGBoost (0.881). When more data were added, Glmnet improved with the highest rate (+ 3.4%). The highest level of variable selection stability over time was observed with LightGBM models. Our results show no clinically relevant improvement when more sophisticated prediction models were used. Since higher stability of selected variables over time contributes to simpler interpretation of the models, interpretability and model calibration should also be considered in development of clinical prediction models. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7371679/ /pubmed/32686721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68771-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kopitar, Leon Kocbek, Primoz Cilar, Leona Sheikh, Aziz Stiglic, Gregor Early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine learning-based prediction models |
title | Early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine learning-based prediction models |
title_full | Early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine learning-based prediction models |
title_fullStr | Early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine learning-based prediction models |
title_full_unstemmed | Early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine learning-based prediction models |
title_short | Early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine learning-based prediction models |
title_sort | early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine learning-based prediction models |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32686721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68771-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kopitarleon earlydetectionoftype2diabetesmellitususingmachinelearningbasedpredictionmodels AT kocbekprimoz earlydetectionoftype2diabetesmellitususingmachinelearningbasedpredictionmodels AT cilarleona earlydetectionoftype2diabetesmellitususingmachinelearningbasedpredictionmodels AT sheikhaziz earlydetectionoftype2diabetesmellitususingmachinelearningbasedpredictionmodels AT stiglicgregor earlydetectionoftype2diabetesmellitususingmachinelearningbasedpredictionmodels |