Cargando…

Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model

In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from vio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sindermann, Cornelia, Kuss, Daria J., Throuvala, Melina A., Griffiths, Mark D., Montag, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415
_version_ 1783561190274760704
author Sindermann, Cornelia
Kuss, Daria J.
Throuvala, Melina A.
Griffiths, Mark D.
Montag, Christian
author_facet Sindermann, Cornelia
Kuss, Daria J.
Throuvala, Melina A.
Griffiths, Mark D.
Montag, Christian
author_sort Sindermann, Cornelia
collection PubMed
description In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from violation of privacy issues to election manipulation. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to think of alternatives to the current data business model. The present study investigated how strong the support would be for a monetary payment model among a sample of 210 participants. Participants were asked about their willingness to pay for social media, if in turn their data would be private and other problems concerning social media use would be tackled. Only one-fifth of participants (21.43%) supported such a model. From the Big Five personality traits, Agreeableness was positively associated with support of such a model. Finally, data are also provided on how much participants would be willing to pay for social media on a monthly basis. The present study’s findings are of a preliminary nature and will contribute to the start of an important discussion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7371851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73718512020-08-04 Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model Sindermann, Cornelia Kuss, Daria J. Throuvala, Melina A. Griffiths, Mark D. Montag, Christian Front Psychol Psychology In the age of surveillance capitalism, the prevailing business model underlying the use of social media applications (“apps”) foresees the exchange of personal data for the allowance to use an online service. Such a data business model comes with many potential negative side effects ranging from violation of privacy issues to election manipulation. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to think of alternatives to the current data business model. The present study investigated how strong the support would be for a monetary payment model among a sample of 210 participants. Participants were asked about their willingness to pay for social media, if in turn their data would be private and other problems concerning social media use would be tackled. Only one-fifth of participants (21.43%) supported such a model. From the Big Five personality traits, Agreeableness was positively associated with support of such a model. Finally, data are also provided on how much participants would be willing to pay for social media on a monthly basis. The present study’s findings are of a preliminary nature and will contribute to the start of an important discussion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7371851/ /pubmed/32760312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sindermann, Kuss, Throuvala, Griffiths and Montag. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Sindermann, Cornelia
Kuss, Daria J.
Throuvala, Melina A.
Griffiths, Mark D.
Montag, Christian
Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model
title Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model
title_full Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model
title_fullStr Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model
title_full_unstemmed Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model
title_short Should We Pay for Our Social Media/Messenger Applications? Preliminary Data on the Acceptance of an Alternative to the Current Prevailing Data Business Model
title_sort should we pay for our social media/messenger applications? preliminary data on the acceptance of an alternative to the current prevailing data business model
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7371851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415
work_keys_str_mv AT sindermanncornelia shouldwepayforoursocialmediamessengerapplicationspreliminarydataontheacceptanceofanalternativetothecurrentprevailingdatabusinessmodel
AT kussdariaj shouldwepayforoursocialmediamessengerapplicationspreliminarydataontheacceptanceofanalternativetothecurrentprevailingdatabusinessmodel
AT throuvalamelinaa shouldwepayforoursocialmediamessengerapplicationspreliminarydataontheacceptanceofanalternativetothecurrentprevailingdatabusinessmodel
AT griffithsmarkd shouldwepayforoursocialmediamessengerapplicationspreliminarydataontheacceptanceofanalternativetothecurrentprevailingdatabusinessmodel
AT montagchristian shouldwepayforoursocialmediamessengerapplicationspreliminarydataontheacceptanceofanalternativetothecurrentprevailingdatabusinessmodel