Cargando…
Correlation Between Serum Uric Acid Level and Central Body Fat Distribution in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between serum uric acid level and central body fat distribution in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: A total of 867 patients with T2DM were enrolled. Measurements of central fat distribution were obtained by dual energ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765031 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S260891 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between serum uric acid level and central body fat distribution in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: A total of 867 patients with T2DM were enrolled. Measurements of central fat distribution were obtained by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Patients were stratified into three groups according to their levels of serum uric acid (SUA). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the association between SUA and central body fat distribution. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the risk factors for hyperuricemia (HUA). Mediation analysis was applied to assess the overall, direct, and indirect mediators of SUA levels. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analysis showed that SUA levels were significantly positively correlated with waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), Android fat mass, Gynoid fat mass, fasting c-peptide (F-CP), and area under the curve of C-peptide (P < 0.05 for all). VAT [odds ratio (OR), 2.367; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.078–5.197; P < 0.001)], WC (OR, 1.041; 95% CI, 1.011–1.072; P < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein (OR, 0.274; 95% CI, 0.104–0.727; P < 0.001), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR, 0.966; 95% CI, 0.959–0.973; P < 0.001) were found to be independent risk factors for T2DM patients with HUA. After mediation analysis, BMI and central obesity were found to have different partial effects on the association between SUA and F-CP (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with T2DM, HUA was positively correlated with F-CP and central body fat distribution, especially VAT. These results suggest that central obesity may play a role in the positive correlation between HUA and insulin resistance (IR). |
---|