Cargando…
_version_ 1783561327618293760
author Anastassiadou, Maria
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Chaideftou, Eugenia
Chiusolo, Arianna
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Oriol
Mangas, Iris
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Santos, Miguel
Sharp, Rachel
Stanek, Alois
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
author_facet Anastassiadou, Maria
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Chaideftou, Eugenia
Chiusolo, Arianna
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Oriol
Mangas, Iris
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Santos, Miguel
Sharp, Rachel
Stanek, Alois
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
collection PubMed
description The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State, France, for the pesticide active substance prosulfuron are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of prosulfuron as a herbicide on maize and sweet corn. Following the renewal of approval, prosulfuron has been renewed with the restriction that the use shall be limited to one application every 3 years. This assessment follows the request of the applicant to lift the restriction of the approval conditions. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7372485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73724852020-07-22 Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prosulfuron Anastassiadou, Maria Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Brancato, Alba Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Chaideftou, Eugenia Chiusolo, Arianna Crivellente, Federica De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Fait, Gabriella Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lostia, Alfonso Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, Oriol Mangas, Iris Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Santos, Miguel Sharp, Rachel Stanek, Alois Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Terron, Andrea Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Villamar‐Bouza, Laura EFSA J Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State, France, for the pesticide active substance prosulfuron are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of prosulfuron as a herbicide on maize and sweet corn. Following the renewal of approval, prosulfuron has been renewed with the restriction that the use shall be limited to one application every 3 years. This assessment follows the request of the applicant to lift the restriction of the approval conditions. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7372485/ /pubmed/32704314 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6181 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review
Anastassiadou, Maria
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Chaideftou, Eugenia
Chiusolo, Arianna
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Oriol
Mangas, Iris
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Santos, Miguel
Sharp, Rachel
Stanek, Alois
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prosulfuron
title Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prosulfuron
title_full Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prosulfuron
title_fullStr Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prosulfuron
title_full_unstemmed Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prosulfuron
title_short Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prosulfuron
title_sort peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prosulfuron
topic Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704314
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6181
work_keys_str_mv AT peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT anastassiadoumaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT arenamaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT auteridomenica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT brancatoalba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT buralaszlo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT carrascocabreraluis peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT chaideftoueugenia peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT chiusoloarianna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT crivellentefederica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT delentdeckerchloe peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT egsmosemark peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT faitgabriella peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT grecoluna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT ippolitoalessio peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT istacefrederique peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT jarrahsamira peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT kardassidimitra peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT leuschnerrenata peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT lostiaalfonso peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT lythgochristopher peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT magransoriol peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT mangasiris peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT mironileana peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT molnartunde peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT padovanilaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT parramortejuanmanuel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT pedersenragnor peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT reichhermine peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT santosmiguel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT sharprachel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT stanekalois peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT sturmajuergen peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT szentescsaba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT terronandrea peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT tiramanimanuela peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT vagenendebenedicte peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron
AT villamarbouzalaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceprosulfuron