Cargando…
Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
BACKGROUND: The optimal management of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) consists of thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine ((131)I) therapy. The prescribed activity of (131)I can be determined using two approaches: 1) empiric prescribed activity of (131)I (E-Rx); and 2) dosi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21849530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0494 |
_version_ | 1783561342306746368 |
---|---|
author | Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, Joanna Van Nostrand, Douglas Atkins, Frank Burman, Kenneth Jonklaas, Jacqueline Mete, Mihriye Wartofsky, Leonard |
author_facet | Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, Joanna Van Nostrand, Douglas Atkins, Frank Burman, Kenneth Jonklaas, Jacqueline Mete, Mihriye Wartofsky, Leonard |
author_sort | Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, Joanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal management of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) consists of thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine ((131)I) therapy. The prescribed activity of (131)I can be determined using two approaches: 1) empiric prescribed activity of (131)I (E-Rx); and 2) dosimetry-based prescribed activity of (131)I (D-Rx). AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the relative treatment efficacy and side effects of D-Rx vs. E-Rx. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with distant metastases and/or locoregionally advanced radioiodine-avid DTC who were treated with either D-Rx or E-Rx. Response to treatment was based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 87 patients followed for 51 ± 35 months, of whom 43 were treated with D-Rx and 44 with E-Rx. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, gender, and status of metastases revealed that the D-Rx group tended to be 70% less likely to progress (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.087–1.02; P = 0.052) and more likely to obtain complete response (CR) compared to the E-Rx group (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–53.5; P = 0.029). There was an association in the D-Rx group between the observed CR and percentage of maximum tolerable activity given as a first treatment of (131)I (P = 0.030). The advantage of D-Rx was specifically apparent in the locoregionally advanced group because CR was significantly higher in D-Rx vs. E-Rx in this group of patients (35.7 vs. 3.3%; P = 0.009). The rates of partial response, stable disease, and progression-free survival, as well as the frequency of side effects, were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Higher efficacy of D-Rx with a similar safety profile compared to E-Rx supports the rationale for employing individually prescribed activity in high-risk patients with DTC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7372577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73725772020-07-23 Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, Joanna Van Nostrand, Douglas Atkins, Frank Burman, Kenneth Jonklaas, Jacqueline Mete, Mihriye Wartofsky, Leonard J Clin Endocrinol Metab Endocrine Research BACKGROUND: The optimal management of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) consists of thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine ((131)I) therapy. The prescribed activity of (131)I can be determined using two approaches: 1) empiric prescribed activity of (131)I (E-Rx); and 2) dosimetry-based prescribed activity of (131)I (D-Rx). AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the relative treatment efficacy and side effects of D-Rx vs. E-Rx. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with distant metastases and/or locoregionally advanced radioiodine-avid DTC who were treated with either D-Rx or E-Rx. Response to treatment was based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 87 patients followed for 51 ± 35 months, of whom 43 were treated with D-Rx and 44 with E-Rx. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, gender, and status of metastases revealed that the D-Rx group tended to be 70% less likely to progress (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.087–1.02; P = 0.052) and more likely to obtain complete response (CR) compared to the E-Rx group (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–53.5; P = 0.029). There was an association in the D-Rx group between the observed CR and percentage of maximum tolerable activity given as a first treatment of (131)I (P = 0.030). The advantage of D-Rx was specifically apparent in the locoregionally advanced group because CR was significantly higher in D-Rx vs. E-Rx in this group of patients (35.7 vs. 3.3%; P = 0.009). The rates of partial response, stable disease, and progression-free survival, as well as the frequency of side effects, were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Higher efficacy of D-Rx with a similar safety profile compared to E-Rx supports the rationale for employing individually prescribed activity in high-risk patients with DTC. Oxford University Press 2011-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7372577/ /pubmed/21849530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0494 Text en Copyright © 2011 by The Endocrine Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Endocrine Research Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, Joanna Van Nostrand, Douglas Atkins, Frank Burman, Kenneth Jonklaas, Jacqueline Mete, Mihriye Wartofsky, Leonard Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer |
title | Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer |
title_full | Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer |
title_short | Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer |
title_sort | efficacy of dosimetric versus empiric prescribed activity of (131)i for therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer |
topic | Endocrine Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21849530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0494 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klubogwiezdzinskajoanna efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT vannostranddouglas efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT atkinsfrank efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT burmankenneth efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT jonklaasjacqueline efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT metemihriye efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT wartofskyleonard efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer |