Cargando…

Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) consists of thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine ((131)I) therapy. The prescribed activity of (131)I can be determined using two approaches: 1) empiric prescribed activity of (131)I (E-Rx); and 2) dosi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, Joanna, Van Nostrand, Douglas, Atkins, Frank, Burman, Kenneth, Jonklaas, Jacqueline, Mete, Mihriye, Wartofsky, Leonard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21849530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0494
_version_ 1783561342306746368
author Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, Joanna
Van Nostrand, Douglas
Atkins, Frank
Burman, Kenneth
Jonklaas, Jacqueline
Mete, Mihriye
Wartofsky, Leonard
author_facet Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, Joanna
Van Nostrand, Douglas
Atkins, Frank
Burman, Kenneth
Jonklaas, Jacqueline
Mete, Mihriye
Wartofsky, Leonard
author_sort Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, Joanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal management of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) consists of thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine ((131)I) therapy. The prescribed activity of (131)I can be determined using two approaches: 1) empiric prescribed activity of (131)I (E-Rx); and 2) dosimetry-based prescribed activity of (131)I (D-Rx). AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the relative treatment efficacy and side effects of D-Rx vs. E-Rx. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with distant metastases and/or locoregionally advanced radioiodine-avid DTC who were treated with either D-Rx or E-Rx. Response to treatment was based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 87 patients followed for 51 ± 35 months, of whom 43 were treated with D-Rx and 44 with E-Rx. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, gender, and status of metastases revealed that the D-Rx group tended to be 70% less likely to progress (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.087–1.02; P = 0.052) and more likely to obtain complete response (CR) compared to the E-Rx group (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–53.5; P = 0.029). There was an association in the D-Rx group between the observed CR and percentage of maximum tolerable activity given as a first treatment of (131)I (P = 0.030). The advantage of D-Rx was specifically apparent in the locoregionally advanced group because CR was significantly higher in D-Rx vs. E-Rx in this group of patients (35.7 vs. 3.3%; P = 0.009). The rates of partial response, stable disease, and progression-free survival, as well as the frequency of side effects, were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Higher efficacy of D-Rx with a similar safety profile compared to E-Rx supports the rationale for employing individually prescribed activity in high-risk patients with DTC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7372577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73725772020-07-23 Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, Joanna Van Nostrand, Douglas Atkins, Frank Burman, Kenneth Jonklaas, Jacqueline Mete, Mihriye Wartofsky, Leonard J Clin Endocrinol Metab Endocrine Research BACKGROUND: The optimal management of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) consists of thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine ((131)I) therapy. The prescribed activity of (131)I can be determined using two approaches: 1) empiric prescribed activity of (131)I (E-Rx); and 2) dosimetry-based prescribed activity of (131)I (D-Rx). AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the relative treatment efficacy and side effects of D-Rx vs. E-Rx. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with distant metastases and/or locoregionally advanced radioiodine-avid DTC who were treated with either D-Rx or E-Rx. Response to treatment was based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 87 patients followed for 51 ± 35 months, of whom 43 were treated with D-Rx and 44 with E-Rx. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, gender, and status of metastases revealed that the D-Rx group tended to be 70% less likely to progress (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.087–1.02; P = 0.052) and more likely to obtain complete response (CR) compared to the E-Rx group (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–53.5; P = 0.029). There was an association in the D-Rx group between the observed CR and percentage of maximum tolerable activity given as a first treatment of (131)I (P = 0.030). The advantage of D-Rx was specifically apparent in the locoregionally advanced group because CR was significantly higher in D-Rx vs. E-Rx in this group of patients (35.7 vs. 3.3%; P = 0.009). The rates of partial response, stable disease, and progression-free survival, as well as the frequency of side effects, were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Higher efficacy of D-Rx with a similar safety profile compared to E-Rx supports the rationale for employing individually prescribed activity in high-risk patients with DTC. Oxford University Press 2011-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7372577/ /pubmed/21849530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0494 Text en Copyright © 2011 by The Endocrine Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Endocrine Research
Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, Joanna
Van Nostrand, Douglas
Atkins, Frank
Burman, Kenneth
Jonklaas, Jacqueline
Mete, Mihriye
Wartofsky, Leonard
Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
title Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
title_full Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
title_fullStr Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
title_short Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of (131)I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
title_sort efficacy of dosimetric versus empiric prescribed activity of (131)i for therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer
topic Endocrine Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21849530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0494
work_keys_str_mv AT klubogwiezdzinskajoanna efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT vannostranddouglas efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT atkinsfrank efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT burmankenneth efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT jonklaasjacqueline efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT metemihriye efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT wartofskyleonard efficacyofdosimetricversusempiricprescribedactivityof131ifortherapyofdifferentiatedthyroidcancer