Cargando…

The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: randomized participant blind controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for plantar fasciitis. DESIGN: A participant blind randomized controlled trial with parallel group design and an active comparator with follow-up at four weeks. SETTINGS: Outpat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naruseviciute, Dovile, Kubilius, Raimondas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32513018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215520929073
_version_ 1783561344923992064
author Naruseviciute, Dovile
Kubilius, Raimondas
author_facet Naruseviciute, Dovile
Kubilius, Raimondas
author_sort Naruseviciute, Dovile
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for plantar fasciitis. DESIGN: A participant blind randomized controlled trial with parallel group design and an active comparator with follow-up at four weeks. SETTINGS: Outpatient, University hospital. SUBJECTS: Unilateral plantar fasciitis participants (n = 102) were randomly assigned into two groups. Recruitment period was from January 2017 to April 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions included eight sessions of laser therapy over three weeks and single session of patient education. The HILT group (n = 51) received HILT and the LLLT group (n = 51) received LLLT. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes: visual analogue scale; secondary outcomes: pressure algometry, sonography of plantar fascia thickness (time frame: baseline to three-week and four-week follow-up) and numeric rating scale (0%–100%) for opinion of participants on effect of treatment (time frame: three weeks). Data presented: mean (SD) or n (%). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups according to visual analogue scale (pain in general reduction in three weeks: 2.57(3.45) vs. 2.88(3.28) cm), pressure algometry (pain threshold difference between healthy and affected heel reduction in three weeks: 1.80(6.39) vs. 1.77(2.85) kg) and sonography measurements (plantar fascia thickness difference between healthy and affected heel reduction in three weeks: 0.19(0.56) vs. 0.30(0.57) mm). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in participants’ opinion in favor to HILT group (efficacy of treatment better than 50%: 26(51%) vs. 37(73%)). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference between groups was observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7372589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73725892020-08-13 The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: randomized participant blind controlled trial Naruseviciute, Dovile Kubilius, Raimondas Clin Rehabil Evaluative Studies OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for plantar fasciitis. DESIGN: A participant blind randomized controlled trial with parallel group design and an active comparator with follow-up at four weeks. SETTINGS: Outpatient, University hospital. SUBJECTS: Unilateral plantar fasciitis participants (n = 102) were randomly assigned into two groups. Recruitment period was from January 2017 to April 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions included eight sessions of laser therapy over three weeks and single session of patient education. The HILT group (n = 51) received HILT and the LLLT group (n = 51) received LLLT. MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes: visual analogue scale; secondary outcomes: pressure algometry, sonography of plantar fascia thickness (time frame: baseline to three-week and four-week follow-up) and numeric rating scale (0%–100%) for opinion of participants on effect of treatment (time frame: three weeks). Data presented: mean (SD) or n (%). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups according to visual analogue scale (pain in general reduction in three weeks: 2.57(3.45) vs. 2.88(3.28) cm), pressure algometry (pain threshold difference between healthy and affected heel reduction in three weeks: 1.80(6.39) vs. 1.77(2.85) kg) and sonography measurements (plantar fascia thickness difference between healthy and affected heel reduction in three weeks: 0.19(0.56) vs. 0.30(0.57) mm). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in participants’ opinion in favor to HILT group (efficacy of treatment better than 50%: 26(51%) vs. 37(73%)). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference between groups was observed. SAGE Publications 2020-06-08 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7372589/ /pubmed/32513018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215520929073 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Evaluative Studies
Naruseviciute, Dovile
Kubilius, Raimondas
The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: randomized participant blind controlled trial
title The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: randomized participant blind controlled trial
title_full The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: randomized participant blind controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: randomized participant blind controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: randomized participant blind controlled trial
title_short The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: randomized participant blind controlled trial
title_sort effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: randomized participant blind controlled trial
topic Evaluative Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32513018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215520929073
work_keys_str_mv AT naruseviciutedovile theeffectofhighintensityversuslowlevellasertherapyinthemanagementofplantarfasciitisrandomizedparticipantblindcontrolledtrial
AT kubiliusraimondas theeffectofhighintensityversuslowlevellasertherapyinthemanagementofplantarfasciitisrandomizedparticipantblindcontrolledtrial
AT naruseviciutedovile effectofhighintensityversuslowlevellasertherapyinthemanagementofplantarfasciitisrandomizedparticipantblindcontrolledtrial
AT kubiliusraimondas effectofhighintensityversuslowlevellasertherapyinthemanagementofplantarfasciitisrandomizedparticipantblindcontrolledtrial