Cargando…

Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method

Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fontana, Juan M., Pan, Zhaoxing, Sazonov, Edward S., McCrory, Megan A., Thomas, J. Graham, McGrane, Kelli S., Marden, Tyson, Higgins, Janine A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00099
_version_ 1783561368838864896
author Fontana, Juan M.
Pan, Zhaoxing
Sazonov, Edward S.
McCrory, Megan A.
Thomas, J. Graham
McGrane, Kelli S.
Marden, Tyson
Higgins, Janine A.
author_facet Fontana, Juan M.
Pan, Zhaoxing
Sazonov, Edward S.
McCrory, Megan A.
Thomas, J. Graham
McGrane, Kelli S.
Marden, Tyson
Higgins, Janine A.
author_sort Fontana, Juan M.
collection PubMed
description Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake. Method: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: (1) weighed food record; (2) photographic food record; (3) diet diary; and (4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method. Results: Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake (p = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility vs. the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4), which was better than that for the diet diary [RC = 79.6 (55.5, 103.3)] but not as repeatable as the photographic method [RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)]. Conclusion: Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7372708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73727082020-08-04 Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method Fontana, Juan M. Pan, Zhaoxing Sazonov, Edward S. McCrory, Megan A. Thomas, J. Graham McGrane, Kelli S. Marden, Tyson Higgins, Janine A. Front Nutr Nutrition Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake. Method: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: (1) weighed food record; (2) photographic food record; (3) diet diary; and (4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method. Results: Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake (p = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility vs. the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4), which was better than that for the diet diary [RC = 79.6 (55.5, 103.3)] but not as repeatable as the photographic method [RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)]. Conclusion: Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7372708/ /pubmed/32760735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00099 Text en Copyright © 2020 Fontana, Pan, Sazonov, McCrory, Thomas, McGrane, Marden and Higgins. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Fontana, Juan M.
Pan, Zhaoxing
Sazonov, Edward S.
McCrory, Megan A.
Thomas, J. Graham
McGrane, Kelli S.
Marden, Tyson
Higgins, Janine A.
Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
title Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
title_full Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
title_fullStr Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
title_short Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
title_sort reproducibility of dietary intake measurement from diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel sensor method
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00099
work_keys_str_mv AT fontanajuanm reproducibilityofdietaryintakemeasurementfromdietdiariesphotographicfoodrecordsandanovelsensormethod
AT panzhaoxing reproducibilityofdietaryintakemeasurementfromdietdiariesphotographicfoodrecordsandanovelsensormethod
AT sazonovedwards reproducibilityofdietaryintakemeasurementfromdietdiariesphotographicfoodrecordsandanovelsensormethod
AT mccrorymegana reproducibilityofdietaryintakemeasurementfromdietdiariesphotographicfoodrecordsandanovelsensormethod
AT thomasjgraham reproducibilityofdietaryintakemeasurementfromdietdiariesphotographicfoodrecordsandanovelsensormethod
AT mcgranekellis reproducibilityofdietaryintakemeasurementfromdietdiariesphotographicfoodrecordsandanovelsensormethod
AT mardentyson reproducibilityofdietaryintakemeasurementfromdietdiariesphotographicfoodrecordsandanovelsensormethod
AT higginsjaninea reproducibilityofdietaryintakemeasurementfromdietdiariesphotographicfoodrecordsandanovelsensormethod