Cargando…

In vitro cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb) bark

BACKGROUND: The study was focused on evaluating cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb.) bark through in vitro pharmacological screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bark was extracted using different solvents, for example, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and aqu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Zubair, Aziz, Sohail, Alauddin, Syed, Mohiuddin, Syed Ghouse, Javed, Adil, Ahmed, Rizwan, Bitar, Ahmad Naoras, Sheikh Ghadzi, Siti Maisharah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742121
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_223_19
_version_ 1783561443762765824
author Ahmed, Zubair
Aziz, Sohail
Alauddin, Syed
Mohiuddin, Syed Ghouse
Javed, Adil
Ahmed, Rizwan
Bitar, Ahmad Naoras
Sheikh Ghadzi, Siti Maisharah
author_facet Ahmed, Zubair
Aziz, Sohail
Alauddin, Syed
Mohiuddin, Syed Ghouse
Javed, Adil
Ahmed, Rizwan
Bitar, Ahmad Naoras
Sheikh Ghadzi, Siti Maisharah
author_sort Ahmed, Zubair
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study was focused on evaluating cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb.) bark through in vitro pharmacological screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bark was extracted using different solvents, for example, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and aqueous for obtaining the organic fractions. These organic fractions were then evaluated for their cytotoxic and antimicrobial activity compared with the standard. Cefixime was used as the standard for antibacterial assay, whereas clotrimazole was used as the standard for antifungal activities. Bacterial strains used were Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), whereas for antifungal activities Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida krusei strains were used. RESULTS: The organic fractions obtained were evaluated for their cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities. In cytotoxic assay (Brine shrimp lethality assay), dichloromethane fraction was the most potent with LD(50) of 47.63, whereas aqueous, methanol, and ethyl acetate fractions showed LD(50) of 121.74, 422.2, and 201.96, respectively. Similarly, for antibacterial assay, dichloromethane fraction showed 32.2mm zone of inhibition against MRSA in comparison with standard cefixime (zone of inhibition, 30.5mm). A minimal zone of inhibition with crude saponins (13.1 and 12.2mm) was observed against C. albicans in comparison to standard (cefixime) with a zone of inhibition of 28.5mm. No prominent results were observed against C. parapsilosis and C. krusei strains. CONCLUSION: The study was based on the plant from Indo-Pak origin, and it has shown some prominent cytotoxic and antibacterial activities. Although the results of this study have provided a basic idea about the efficacy of plant extract, still more explanatory and high-scale studies can be beneficial for elaborating the cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of this plant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7373103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73731032020-07-30 In vitro cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb) bark Ahmed, Zubair Aziz, Sohail Alauddin, Syed Mohiuddin, Syed Ghouse Javed, Adil Ahmed, Rizwan Bitar, Ahmad Naoras Sheikh Ghadzi, Siti Maisharah J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The study was focused on evaluating cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb.) bark through in vitro pharmacological screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bark was extracted using different solvents, for example, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, methanol, and aqueous for obtaining the organic fractions. These organic fractions were then evaluated for their cytotoxic and antimicrobial activity compared with the standard. Cefixime was used as the standard for antibacterial assay, whereas clotrimazole was used as the standard for antifungal activities. Bacterial strains used were Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), whereas for antifungal activities Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida krusei strains were used. RESULTS: The organic fractions obtained were evaluated for their cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities. In cytotoxic assay (Brine shrimp lethality assay), dichloromethane fraction was the most potent with LD(50) of 47.63, whereas aqueous, methanol, and ethyl acetate fractions showed LD(50) of 121.74, 422.2, and 201.96, respectively. Similarly, for antibacterial assay, dichloromethane fraction showed 32.2mm zone of inhibition against MRSA in comparison with standard cefixime (zone of inhibition, 30.5mm). A minimal zone of inhibition with crude saponins (13.1 and 12.2mm) was observed against C. albicans in comparison to standard (cefixime) with a zone of inhibition of 28.5mm. No prominent results were observed against C. parapsilosis and C. krusei strains. CONCLUSION: The study was based on the plant from Indo-Pak origin, and it has shown some prominent cytotoxic and antibacterial activities. Although the results of this study have provided a basic idea about the efficacy of plant extract, still more explanatory and high-scale studies can be beneficial for elaborating the cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of this plant. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7373103/ /pubmed/32742121 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_223_19 Text en © 2020 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmed, Zubair
Aziz, Sohail
Alauddin, Syed
Mohiuddin, Syed Ghouse
Javed, Adil
Ahmed, Rizwan
Bitar, Ahmad Naoras
Sheikh Ghadzi, Siti Maisharah
In vitro cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb) bark
title In vitro cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb) bark
title_full In vitro cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb) bark
title_fullStr In vitro cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb) bark
title_full_unstemmed In vitro cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb) bark
title_short In vitro cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb) bark
title_sort in vitro cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of erythrina suberosa (roxb) bark
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742121
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_223_19
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedzubair invitrocytotoxicandantimicrobialactivitiesoferythrinasuberosaroxbbark
AT azizsohail invitrocytotoxicandantimicrobialactivitiesoferythrinasuberosaroxbbark
AT alauddinsyed invitrocytotoxicandantimicrobialactivitiesoferythrinasuberosaroxbbark
AT mohiuddinsyedghouse invitrocytotoxicandantimicrobialactivitiesoferythrinasuberosaroxbbark
AT javedadil invitrocytotoxicandantimicrobialactivitiesoferythrinasuberosaroxbbark
AT ahmedrizwan invitrocytotoxicandantimicrobialactivitiesoferythrinasuberosaroxbbark
AT bitarahmadnaoras invitrocytotoxicandantimicrobialactivitiesoferythrinasuberosaroxbbark
AT sheikhghadzisitimaisharah invitrocytotoxicandantimicrobialactivitiesoferythrinasuberosaroxbbark