Cargando…

Results of a 2-Year Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Long-term Audiological and Clinical Outcomes of a Transcutaneous Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing

To evaluate 2-year audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous implant for bone conduction hearing of a previously published 6-month evaluation. DESIGN: Fifty-four unilaterally implanted adult patients with conductive or mild mixed hearing loss or single-sided sensorineural deafness were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kruyt, Ivo J., Monksfield, Peter, Skarzynski, Piotr H., Green, Kevin, Runge, Christina, Bosman, Arjan, Blechert, Johan I., Wigren, Stina, Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M., Hol, Myrthe K. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002689
_version_ 1783561497014697984
author Kruyt, Ivo J.
Monksfield, Peter
Skarzynski, Piotr H.
Green, Kevin
Runge, Christina
Bosman, Arjan
Blechert, Johan I.
Wigren, Stina
Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
Hol, Myrthe K. S.
author_facet Kruyt, Ivo J.
Monksfield, Peter
Skarzynski, Piotr H.
Green, Kevin
Runge, Christina
Bosman, Arjan
Blechert, Johan I.
Wigren, Stina
Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
Hol, Myrthe K. S.
author_sort Kruyt, Ivo J.
collection PubMed
description To evaluate 2-year audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous implant for bone conduction hearing of a previously published 6-month evaluation. DESIGN: Fifty-four unilaterally implanted adult patients with conductive or mild mixed hearing loss or single-sided sensorineural deafness were included in this prospective multicenter study. Follow-up visits were scheduled post-surgery at 10 days; 4, 6, and 12 weeks; 6, 12, and 24 months. Main outcomes were audiological benefit, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), soft tissue status, pain, numbness, implant survival, and daily usage. RESULTS: In the study population, the transcutaneous implant resulted in statistically significant improvement in objective hearing test and PROs compared with the unaided situation. Soft tissue complications were observed in 4.6% of the patients per visit. Pain/discomfort and numbness were initially reported in the majority of the patients, but declined over time; approximately 9% of patients reported some degree of numbness and 15% (slight) pain/discomfort after 2 years. During the 24-month period, two implant magnets were removed (3.7%), while two other implants were converted to the percutaneous counterpart (3.7%). At the final visit, 89.6% (n = 42 out of 47) of the patients used their sound processor, with a median daily usage of 6 h/d (range, 0–18 h/d). CONCLUSIONS: After 24 months, the transcutaneous implant provided statistically significant mean improvement in objective and subjective hearing performance as well as PROs compared with the preoperative unaided condition and had a low soft tissue complication rate. The test device could be considered as an alternative treatment option for appropriately selected and counseled patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7373438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73734382020-08-05 Results of a 2-Year Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Long-term Audiological and Clinical Outcomes of a Transcutaneous Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing Kruyt, Ivo J. Monksfield, Peter Skarzynski, Piotr H. Green, Kevin Runge, Christina Bosman, Arjan Blechert, Johan I. Wigren, Stina Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M. Hol, Myrthe K. S. Otol Neurotol Audiology To evaluate 2-year audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous implant for bone conduction hearing of a previously published 6-month evaluation. DESIGN: Fifty-four unilaterally implanted adult patients with conductive or mild mixed hearing loss or single-sided sensorineural deafness were included in this prospective multicenter study. Follow-up visits were scheduled post-surgery at 10 days; 4, 6, and 12 weeks; 6, 12, and 24 months. Main outcomes were audiological benefit, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), soft tissue status, pain, numbness, implant survival, and daily usage. RESULTS: In the study population, the transcutaneous implant resulted in statistically significant improvement in objective hearing test and PROs compared with the unaided situation. Soft tissue complications were observed in 4.6% of the patients per visit. Pain/discomfort and numbness were initially reported in the majority of the patients, but declined over time; approximately 9% of patients reported some degree of numbness and 15% (slight) pain/discomfort after 2 years. During the 24-month period, two implant magnets were removed (3.7%), while two other implants were converted to the percutaneous counterpart (3.7%). At the final visit, 89.6% (n = 42 out of 47) of the patients used their sound processor, with a median daily usage of 6 h/d (range, 0–18 h/d). CONCLUSIONS: After 24 months, the transcutaneous implant provided statistically significant mean improvement in objective and subjective hearing performance as well as PROs compared with the preoperative unaided condition and had a low soft tissue complication rate. The test device could be considered as an alternative treatment option for appropriately selected and counseled patients. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-08 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7373438/ /pubmed/32310837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002689 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Audiology
Kruyt, Ivo J.
Monksfield, Peter
Skarzynski, Piotr H.
Green, Kevin
Runge, Christina
Bosman, Arjan
Blechert, Johan I.
Wigren, Stina
Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
Hol, Myrthe K. S.
Results of a 2-Year Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Long-term Audiological and Clinical Outcomes of a Transcutaneous Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing
title Results of a 2-Year Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Long-term Audiological and Clinical Outcomes of a Transcutaneous Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing
title_full Results of a 2-Year Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Long-term Audiological and Clinical Outcomes of a Transcutaneous Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing
title_fullStr Results of a 2-Year Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Long-term Audiological and Clinical Outcomes of a Transcutaneous Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing
title_full_unstemmed Results of a 2-Year Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Long-term Audiological and Clinical Outcomes of a Transcutaneous Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing
title_short Results of a 2-Year Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Long-term Audiological and Clinical Outcomes of a Transcutaneous Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing
title_sort results of a 2-year prospective multicenter study evaluating long-term audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous implant for bone conduction hearing
topic Audiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002689
work_keys_str_mv AT kruytivoj resultsofa2yearprospectivemulticenterstudyevaluatinglongtermaudiologicalandclinicaloutcomesofatranscutaneousimplantforboneconductionhearing
AT monksfieldpeter resultsofa2yearprospectivemulticenterstudyevaluatinglongtermaudiologicalandclinicaloutcomesofatranscutaneousimplantforboneconductionhearing
AT skarzynskipiotrh resultsofa2yearprospectivemulticenterstudyevaluatinglongtermaudiologicalandclinicaloutcomesofatranscutaneousimplantforboneconductionhearing
AT greenkevin resultsofa2yearprospectivemulticenterstudyevaluatinglongtermaudiologicalandclinicaloutcomesofatranscutaneousimplantforboneconductionhearing
AT rungechristina resultsofa2yearprospectivemulticenterstudyevaluatinglongtermaudiologicalandclinicaloutcomesofatranscutaneousimplantforboneconductionhearing
AT bosmanarjan resultsofa2yearprospectivemulticenterstudyevaluatinglongtermaudiologicalandclinicaloutcomesofatranscutaneousimplantforboneconductionhearing
AT blechertjohani resultsofa2yearprospectivemulticenterstudyevaluatinglongtermaudiologicalandclinicaloutcomesofatranscutaneousimplantforboneconductionhearing
AT wigrenstina resultsofa2yearprospectivemulticenterstudyevaluatinglongtermaudiologicalandclinicaloutcomesofatranscutaneousimplantforboneconductionhearing
AT mylanusemmanuelam resultsofa2yearprospectivemulticenterstudyevaluatinglongtermaudiologicalandclinicaloutcomesofatranscutaneousimplantforboneconductionhearing
AT holmyrtheks resultsofa2yearprospectivemulticenterstudyevaluatinglongtermaudiologicalandclinicaloutcomesofatranscutaneousimplantforboneconductionhearing