Cargando…
Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis
BACKGROUND: Single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) techniques are 2 kinds of widely used approaches for the arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff. This retrospective clinical trial was performed to address the question of whether a DR rotator cuff anchor repair gives results superior to a SR anchor repai...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32702843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021030 |
_version_ | 1783561507610558464 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Yanming Zhao, Jiasong Qiu, Heng Huang, Yong |
author_facet | Lin, Yanming Zhao, Jiasong Qiu, Heng Huang, Yong |
author_sort | Lin, Yanming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) techniques are 2 kinds of widely used approaches for the arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff. This retrospective clinical trial was performed to address the question of whether a DR rotator cuff anchor repair gives results superior to a SR anchor repair in clinical outcome scores and complication rates. METHODS: This study was performed and reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist. We retrospectively reviewed our database, which was collected prospectively. From 2014 to 2017, 264 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by an experienced single shoulder surgeon with the SR and DR techniques. This study was approved by the institutional review board in our hospital and was registered in the Research Registry. Outcome measures included Constant-Murley score, muscle strength, patient satisfaction, passive range of motion, and retear rates. RESULTS: The hypothesis was that the DR technique would achieve better functional scores and fewer complications as compared to the SR technique in treatment of rotator cuff tears. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7373522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73735222020-08-05 Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis Lin, Yanming Zhao, Jiasong Qiu, Heng Huang, Yong Medicine (Baltimore) 7000 BACKGROUND: Single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) techniques are 2 kinds of widely used approaches for the arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff. This retrospective clinical trial was performed to address the question of whether a DR rotator cuff anchor repair gives results superior to a SR anchor repair in clinical outcome scores and complication rates. METHODS: This study was performed and reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist. We retrospectively reviewed our database, which was collected prospectively. From 2014 to 2017, 264 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by an experienced single shoulder surgeon with the SR and DR techniques. This study was approved by the institutional review board in our hospital and was registered in the Research Registry. Outcome measures included Constant-Murley score, muscle strength, patient satisfaction, passive range of motion, and retear rates. RESULTS: The hypothesis was that the DR technique would achieve better functional scores and fewer complications as compared to the SR technique in treatment of rotator cuff tears. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7373522/ /pubmed/32702843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021030 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7000 Lin, Yanming Zhao, Jiasong Qiu, Heng Huang, Yong Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis |
title | Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis |
title_full | Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis |
title_short | Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis |
title_sort | comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a protocol of cohort analysis |
topic | 7000 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32702843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linyanming comparisonofarthroscopicsinglerowanddoublerowrepairinthetreatmentofrotatorcufftearsaprotocolofcohortanalysis AT zhaojiasong comparisonofarthroscopicsinglerowanddoublerowrepairinthetreatmentofrotatorcufftearsaprotocolofcohortanalysis AT qiuheng comparisonofarthroscopicsinglerowanddoublerowrepairinthetreatmentofrotatorcufftearsaprotocolofcohortanalysis AT huangyong comparisonofarthroscopicsinglerowanddoublerowrepairinthetreatmentofrotatorcufftearsaprotocolofcohortanalysis |