Cargando…

Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis

BACKGROUND: Single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) techniques are 2 kinds of widely used approaches for the arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff. This retrospective clinical trial was performed to address the question of whether a DR rotator cuff anchor repair gives results superior to a SR anchor repai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Yanming, Zhao, Jiasong, Qiu, Heng, Huang, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32702843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021030
_version_ 1783561507610558464
author Lin, Yanming
Zhao, Jiasong
Qiu, Heng
Huang, Yong
author_facet Lin, Yanming
Zhao, Jiasong
Qiu, Heng
Huang, Yong
author_sort Lin, Yanming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) techniques are 2 kinds of widely used approaches for the arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff. This retrospective clinical trial was performed to address the question of whether a DR rotator cuff anchor repair gives results superior to a SR anchor repair in clinical outcome scores and complication rates. METHODS: This study was performed and reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist. We retrospectively reviewed our database, which was collected prospectively. From 2014 to 2017, 264 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by an experienced single shoulder surgeon with the SR and DR techniques. This study was approved by the institutional review board in our hospital and was registered in the Research Registry. Outcome measures included Constant-Murley score, muscle strength, patient satisfaction, passive range of motion, and retear rates. RESULTS: The hypothesis was that the DR technique would achieve better functional scores and fewer complications as compared to the SR technique in treatment of rotator cuff tears.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7373522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73735222020-08-05 Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis Lin, Yanming Zhao, Jiasong Qiu, Heng Huang, Yong Medicine (Baltimore) 7000 BACKGROUND: Single-row (SR) and double-row (DR) techniques are 2 kinds of widely used approaches for the arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff. This retrospective clinical trial was performed to address the question of whether a DR rotator cuff anchor repair gives results superior to a SR anchor repair in clinical outcome scores and complication rates. METHODS: This study was performed and reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist. We retrospectively reviewed our database, which was collected prospectively. From 2014 to 2017, 264 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by an experienced single shoulder surgeon with the SR and DR techniques. This study was approved by the institutional review board in our hospital and was registered in the Research Registry. Outcome measures included Constant-Murley score, muscle strength, patient satisfaction, passive range of motion, and retear rates. RESULTS: The hypothesis was that the DR technique would achieve better functional scores and fewer complications as compared to the SR technique in treatment of rotator cuff tears. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7373522/ /pubmed/32702843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021030 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7000
Lin, Yanming
Zhao, Jiasong
Qiu, Heng
Huang, Yong
Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis
title Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis
title_full Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis
title_short Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: A protocol of cohort analysis
title_sort comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a protocol of cohort analysis
topic 7000
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32702843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021030
work_keys_str_mv AT linyanming comparisonofarthroscopicsinglerowanddoublerowrepairinthetreatmentofrotatorcufftearsaprotocolofcohortanalysis
AT zhaojiasong comparisonofarthroscopicsinglerowanddoublerowrepairinthetreatmentofrotatorcufftearsaprotocolofcohortanalysis
AT qiuheng comparisonofarthroscopicsinglerowanddoublerowrepairinthetreatmentofrotatorcufftearsaprotocolofcohortanalysis
AT huangyong comparisonofarthroscopicsinglerowanddoublerowrepairinthetreatmentofrotatorcufftearsaprotocolofcohortanalysis