Cargando…
Lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia
Lefamulin is a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic with potent in vitro activity against key community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) pathogens. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of lefamulin for treating CABP remains unclear. An integrated analysis of 2 phase III trials investigating the cl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32702892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021223 |
_version_ | 1783561523489144832 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Hung-Jen Wang, Jui-Hsiang Lai, Chih-Cheng |
author_facet | Tang, Hung-Jen Wang, Jui-Hsiang Lai, Chih-Cheng |
author_sort | Tang, Hung-Jen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lefamulin is a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic with potent in vitro activity against key community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) pathogens. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of lefamulin for treating CABP remains unclear. An integrated analysis of 2 phase III trials investigating the clinical efficacy and safety of lefamulin vs moxifloxacin in the treatment of CABP was conducted. A total of 1289 patients (lefamulin group: 646 and moxifloxacin group: 643) were included in this analysis. The early clinical response rate was 89.3% and 90.5% among lefamulin and moxifloxacin group, respectively. Lefamulin was noninferior to moxifloxacin (89.3% vs 90.5%, RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95–1.02, I(2) = 0%). In terms of clinical response at test of cure, no significant difference was observed between the lefamulin and moxifloxacin groups (for modified intention to treat population, RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.94–1.02, I(2) = 0%; for clinically evaluable population, RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, I(2) = 0%). In the subgroup analysis, the early clinical response rate at early clinical assessment and clinical response rate at test of cure of lefamulin was similar to that of moxifloxacin across different subgpopulations and all baseline CABP pathogens. Lefamulin was associated with a similar risk of adverse events as moxifloxacin. Clinical efficacy and tolerability for lefamulin in the treatment of CABP were similar to those for moxifloxacin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7373590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73735902020-08-05 Lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia Tang, Hung-Jen Wang, Jui-Hsiang Lai, Chih-Cheng Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 Lefamulin is a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic with potent in vitro activity against key community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) pathogens. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of lefamulin for treating CABP remains unclear. An integrated analysis of 2 phase III trials investigating the clinical efficacy and safety of lefamulin vs moxifloxacin in the treatment of CABP was conducted. A total of 1289 patients (lefamulin group: 646 and moxifloxacin group: 643) were included in this analysis. The early clinical response rate was 89.3% and 90.5% among lefamulin and moxifloxacin group, respectively. Lefamulin was noninferior to moxifloxacin (89.3% vs 90.5%, RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95–1.02, I(2) = 0%). In terms of clinical response at test of cure, no significant difference was observed between the lefamulin and moxifloxacin groups (for modified intention to treat population, RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.94–1.02, I(2) = 0%; for clinically evaluable population, RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, I(2) = 0%). In the subgroup analysis, the early clinical response rate at early clinical assessment and clinical response rate at test of cure of lefamulin was similar to that of moxifloxacin across different subgpopulations and all baseline CABP pathogens. Lefamulin was associated with a similar risk of adverse events as moxifloxacin. Clinical efficacy and tolerability for lefamulin in the treatment of CABP were similar to those for moxifloxacin. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7373590/ /pubmed/32702892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021223 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4900 Tang, Hung-Jen Wang, Jui-Hsiang Lai, Chih-Cheng Lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia |
title | Lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia |
title_full | Lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia |
title_fullStr | Lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia |
title_full_unstemmed | Lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia |
title_short | Lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia |
title_sort | lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia |
topic | 4900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32702892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanghungjen lefamulinvsmoxifloxacinforcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumonia AT wangjuihsiang lefamulinvsmoxifloxacinforcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumonia AT laichihcheng lefamulinvsmoxifloxacinforcommunityacquiredbacterialpneumonia |