Cargando…

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy or hepaticojejunostomy without dilation using a stent with a thinner delivery system

Background and study aim  Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has recently increased. In EUS-BD, after puncturing the bile duct, dilation is performed and the stent is deployed. Due to adverse events (AEs) such as unexpected displacement of the guidewire, simplified procedu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maehara, Kosuke, Hijioka, Susumu, Nagashio, Yoshikuni, Ohba, Akihiro, Maruki, Yuta, Suzuki, Hiromi, Sone, Miyuki, Okusaka, Takuji, Saito, Yutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1169-3749
_version_ 1783561537809547264
author Maehara, Kosuke
Hijioka, Susumu
Nagashio, Yoshikuni
Ohba, Akihiro
Maruki, Yuta
Suzuki, Hiromi
Sone, Miyuki
Okusaka, Takuji
Saito, Yutaka
author_facet Maehara, Kosuke
Hijioka, Susumu
Nagashio, Yoshikuni
Ohba, Akihiro
Maruki, Yuta
Suzuki, Hiromi
Sone, Miyuki
Okusaka, Takuji
Saito, Yutaka
author_sort Maehara, Kosuke
collection PubMed
description Background and study aim  Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has recently increased. In EUS-BD, after puncturing the bile duct, dilation is performed and the stent is deployed. Due to adverse events (AEs) such as unexpected displacement of the guidewire, simplified procedures are required. Currently, stents with small-diameter delivery systems are being rapidly developed, expanding the possibilities for of EUS-BD without dilation. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the success rates and AEs in patients who underwent EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) or EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy (EUS-HJS) without dilation. Patients and methods  Six consecutive patients with malignant biliary obstruction and failed transpapillary BD underwent EUS-HGS or EUS-HJS without dilation, deploying a 6-mm fully-covered self-expandable metallic stent with a 6-Fr delivery system. Results  The technical and clinical success rates were 100 %. There was one case each of stent migration and stent occlusion, and no other AEs were noted. Conclusions  EUS-HGS or EUS-HJS without dilation using a stent with a 6-Fr delivery system had high technical and clinical success rates; however, additional cases are required to validate the study findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7373653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73736532020-08-01 Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy or hepaticojejunostomy without dilation using a stent with a thinner delivery system Maehara, Kosuke Hijioka, Susumu Nagashio, Yoshikuni Ohba, Akihiro Maruki, Yuta Suzuki, Hiromi Sone, Miyuki Okusaka, Takuji Saito, Yutaka Endosc Int Open Background and study aim  Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has recently increased. In EUS-BD, after puncturing the bile duct, dilation is performed and the stent is deployed. Due to adverse events (AEs) such as unexpected displacement of the guidewire, simplified procedures are required. Currently, stents with small-diameter delivery systems are being rapidly developed, expanding the possibilities for of EUS-BD without dilation. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the success rates and AEs in patients who underwent EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) or EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy (EUS-HJS) without dilation. Patients and methods  Six consecutive patients with malignant biliary obstruction and failed transpapillary BD underwent EUS-HGS or EUS-HJS without dilation, deploying a 6-mm fully-covered self-expandable metallic stent with a 6-Fr delivery system. Results  The technical and clinical success rates were 100 %. There was one case each of stent migration and stent occlusion, and no other AEs were noted. Conclusions  EUS-HGS or EUS-HJS without dilation using a stent with a 6-Fr delivery system had high technical and clinical success rates; however, additional cases are required to validate the study findings. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-08 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7373653/ /pubmed/32743055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1169-3749 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Maehara, Kosuke
Hijioka, Susumu
Nagashio, Yoshikuni
Ohba, Akihiro
Maruki, Yuta
Suzuki, Hiromi
Sone, Miyuki
Okusaka, Takuji
Saito, Yutaka
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy or hepaticojejunostomy without dilation using a stent with a thinner delivery system
title Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy or hepaticojejunostomy without dilation using a stent with a thinner delivery system
title_full Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy or hepaticojejunostomy without dilation using a stent with a thinner delivery system
title_fullStr Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy or hepaticojejunostomy without dilation using a stent with a thinner delivery system
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy or hepaticojejunostomy without dilation using a stent with a thinner delivery system
title_short Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy or hepaticojejunostomy without dilation using a stent with a thinner delivery system
title_sort endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy or hepaticojejunostomy without dilation using a stent with a thinner delivery system
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1169-3749
work_keys_str_mv AT maeharakosuke endoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyorhepaticojejunostomywithoutdilationusingastentwithathinnerdeliverysystem
AT hijiokasusumu endoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyorhepaticojejunostomywithoutdilationusingastentwithathinnerdeliverysystem
AT nagashioyoshikuni endoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyorhepaticojejunostomywithoutdilationusingastentwithathinnerdeliverysystem
AT ohbaakihiro endoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyorhepaticojejunostomywithoutdilationusingastentwithathinnerdeliverysystem
AT marukiyuta endoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyorhepaticojejunostomywithoutdilationusingastentwithathinnerdeliverysystem
AT suzukihiromi endoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyorhepaticojejunostomywithoutdilationusingastentwithathinnerdeliverysystem
AT sonemiyuki endoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyorhepaticojejunostomywithoutdilationusingastentwithathinnerdeliverysystem
AT okusakatakuji endoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyorhepaticojejunostomywithoutdilationusingastentwithathinnerdeliverysystem
AT saitoyutaka endoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomyorhepaticojejunostomywithoutdilationusingastentwithathinnerdeliverysystem