Cargando…

Reorganization of Muscle Coordination Underlying Motor Learning in Cycling Tasks

The hypothesis of modular control, which stands on the existence of muscle synergies as building blocks of muscle coordination, has been investigated in a great variety of motor tasks and species. Yet, its role during learning processes is still largely unexplored. To what extent is such modular con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torricelli, Diego, De Marchis, Cristiano, d’Avella, Andrea, Tobaruela, Daniel Nemati, Barroso, Filipe Oliveira, Pons, Jose L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760711
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00800
_version_ 1783561550497316864
author Torricelli, Diego
De Marchis, Cristiano
d’Avella, Andrea
Tobaruela, Daniel Nemati
Barroso, Filipe Oliveira
Pons, Jose L.
author_facet Torricelli, Diego
De Marchis, Cristiano
d’Avella, Andrea
Tobaruela, Daniel Nemati
Barroso, Filipe Oliveira
Pons, Jose L.
author_sort Torricelli, Diego
collection PubMed
description The hypothesis of modular control, which stands on the existence of muscle synergies as building blocks of muscle coordination, has been investigated in a great variety of motor tasks and species. Yet, its role during learning processes is still largely unexplored. To what extent is such modular control flexible, in terms of spatial structure and temporal activation, to externally or internally induced adaptations, is a debated issue. To address this question, we designed a biofeedback experiment to induce changes in the timing of muscle activations during leg cycling movements. The protocol consisted in delaying the peak of activation of one target muscle and using its electromyography (EMG) envelope as visual biofeedback. For each of the 10 healthy participants, the protocol was repeated for three different target muscles: Tibialis Anterioris (TA), Gastrocnemius Medialis (GM), and Vastus Lateralis (VL). To explore the effects of the conditioning protocol, we analyzed changes in the activity of eight lower limb muscles by applying different models of modular motor control [i.e., fixed spatial components (FSC) and fixed temporal components (FTC)]. Our results confirm the hypothesis that visual EMG biofeedback is able to induce changes in muscle coordination. Subjects were able to shift the peak of activation of the target muscle, with a delay of (49 ± 27°) across subjects and conditions. This time shift generated a reorganization of all the other muscles in terms of timing and amplitude. By using different models of modular motor control, we demonstrated that neither spatially invariant nor temporally invariant muscle synergies alone were able to account for these changes in muscle coordination after learning, while temporally invariant muscle synergies with adjustments in timing could capture most of muscle activity adaptations observed after the conditioning protocol. These results suggest that short-term learning in rhythmic tasks is built upon synergistic temporal commands that are robust to changes in the task demands.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7373728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73737282020-08-04 Reorganization of Muscle Coordination Underlying Motor Learning in Cycling Tasks Torricelli, Diego De Marchis, Cristiano d’Avella, Andrea Tobaruela, Daniel Nemati Barroso, Filipe Oliveira Pons, Jose L. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology The hypothesis of modular control, which stands on the existence of muscle synergies as building blocks of muscle coordination, has been investigated in a great variety of motor tasks and species. Yet, its role during learning processes is still largely unexplored. To what extent is such modular control flexible, in terms of spatial structure and temporal activation, to externally or internally induced adaptations, is a debated issue. To address this question, we designed a biofeedback experiment to induce changes in the timing of muscle activations during leg cycling movements. The protocol consisted in delaying the peak of activation of one target muscle and using its electromyography (EMG) envelope as visual biofeedback. For each of the 10 healthy participants, the protocol was repeated for three different target muscles: Tibialis Anterioris (TA), Gastrocnemius Medialis (GM), and Vastus Lateralis (VL). To explore the effects of the conditioning protocol, we analyzed changes in the activity of eight lower limb muscles by applying different models of modular motor control [i.e., fixed spatial components (FSC) and fixed temporal components (FTC)]. Our results confirm the hypothesis that visual EMG biofeedback is able to induce changes in muscle coordination. Subjects were able to shift the peak of activation of the target muscle, with a delay of (49 ± 27°) across subjects and conditions. This time shift generated a reorganization of all the other muscles in terms of timing and amplitude. By using different models of modular motor control, we demonstrated that neither spatially invariant nor temporally invariant muscle synergies alone were able to account for these changes in muscle coordination after learning, while temporally invariant muscle synergies with adjustments in timing could capture most of muscle activity adaptations observed after the conditioning protocol. These results suggest that short-term learning in rhythmic tasks is built upon synergistic temporal commands that are robust to changes in the task demands. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7373728/ /pubmed/32760711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00800 Text en Copyright © 2020 Torricelli, De Marchis, d’Avella, Tobaruela, Barroso and Pons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Torricelli, Diego
De Marchis, Cristiano
d’Avella, Andrea
Tobaruela, Daniel Nemati
Barroso, Filipe Oliveira
Pons, Jose L.
Reorganization of Muscle Coordination Underlying Motor Learning in Cycling Tasks
title Reorganization of Muscle Coordination Underlying Motor Learning in Cycling Tasks
title_full Reorganization of Muscle Coordination Underlying Motor Learning in Cycling Tasks
title_fullStr Reorganization of Muscle Coordination Underlying Motor Learning in Cycling Tasks
title_full_unstemmed Reorganization of Muscle Coordination Underlying Motor Learning in Cycling Tasks
title_short Reorganization of Muscle Coordination Underlying Motor Learning in Cycling Tasks
title_sort reorganization of muscle coordination underlying motor learning in cycling tasks
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760711
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00800
work_keys_str_mv AT torricellidiego reorganizationofmusclecoordinationunderlyingmotorlearningincyclingtasks
AT demarchiscristiano reorganizationofmusclecoordinationunderlyingmotorlearningincyclingtasks
AT davellaandrea reorganizationofmusclecoordinationunderlyingmotorlearningincyclingtasks
AT tobarueladanielnemati reorganizationofmusclecoordinationunderlyingmotorlearningincyclingtasks
AT barrosofilipeoliveira reorganizationofmusclecoordinationunderlyingmotorlearningincyclingtasks
AT ponsjosel reorganizationofmusclecoordinationunderlyingmotorlearningincyclingtasks