Cargando…

Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant

AIMS: Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is associated with adverse events in patients undergoing heart transplant (HTx), although studies directly comparing tacrolimus (TAC) versus cyclosporin A (CsA), especially in combination with everolimus and low‐dose CNIs approach, are limited. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shiraishi, Yasuyuki, Amiya, Eisuke, Hatano, Masaru, Katsuki, Toshiomi, Bujo, Chie, Tsuji, Masaki, Nitta, Daisuke, Maki, Hisataka, Ishida, Junichi, Kagami, Yukie, Endo, Miyoko, Kimura, Mitsutoshi, Ando, Masahiko, Shimada, Shogo, Kinoshita, Osamu, Ono, Minoru, Komuro, Issei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32445260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12749
_version_ 1783561579997954048
author Shiraishi, Yasuyuki
Amiya, Eisuke
Hatano, Masaru
Katsuki, Toshiomi
Bujo, Chie
Tsuji, Masaki
Nitta, Daisuke
Maki, Hisataka
Ishida, Junichi
Kagami, Yukie
Endo, Miyoko
Kimura, Mitsutoshi
Ando, Masahiko
Shimada, Shogo
Kinoshita, Osamu
Ono, Minoru
Komuro, Issei
author_facet Shiraishi, Yasuyuki
Amiya, Eisuke
Hatano, Masaru
Katsuki, Toshiomi
Bujo, Chie
Tsuji, Masaki
Nitta, Daisuke
Maki, Hisataka
Ishida, Junichi
Kagami, Yukie
Endo, Miyoko
Kimura, Mitsutoshi
Ando, Masahiko
Shimada, Shogo
Kinoshita, Osamu
Ono, Minoru
Komuro, Issei
author_sort Shiraishi, Yasuyuki
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is associated with adverse events in patients undergoing heart transplant (HTx), although studies directly comparing tacrolimus (TAC) versus cyclosporin A (CsA), especially in combination with everolimus and low‐dose CNIs approach, are limited. Thus, we sought to investigate the associations of TAC and CsA with clinical outcomes in HTx recipients, with specific focus on renal function. METHODS AND RESULTS: From August 2007 to February 2017, 72 consecutive patients (39 treated with TAC vs. 33 with CsA) receiving de novo HTx in a single transplant centre were retrospectively evaluated. We used the instrumental variable method to account for unmeasured confounding. The study outcomes were percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) (safety endpoint) and biopsy‐proven acute rejection (efficacy endpoint) within the first year after HTx. The enrolled patients (median age 40 years) were predominantly men (68%). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, including eGFR (64.8 [45.7–96.4] mL/min/1.73 m(2) in TAC vs. 65.6 [57.9–83.0] mL/min/1.73 m(2) for CsA; P = 0.48), other than sex (male, 49% for TAC vs. 91% for CsA; P < 0.001) between the two groups. Within the first year after HTx, 23 (59%) in the TAC group switched mycophenolate mofetil to everolimus, whereas 16 (48%) in the CsA group (P = 0.52). At 12 months, the rates of mortality and end‐stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapies were both 0%. In the instrumental variable analysis, no differences in renal function as well as graft rejection for 1 year after HTx existed between the TAC and CsA groups. These results were similar when taking into account of everolimus use. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of everolimus use with low‐dose CNIs, our analysis using the instrumental variable method showed no differences in renal function as well as graft rejection during the first year after HTx between HTx recipients who received TAC or CsA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7373882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73738822020-07-22 Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant Shiraishi, Yasuyuki Amiya, Eisuke Hatano, Masaru Katsuki, Toshiomi Bujo, Chie Tsuji, Masaki Nitta, Daisuke Maki, Hisataka Ishida, Junichi Kagami, Yukie Endo, Miyoko Kimura, Mitsutoshi Ando, Masahiko Shimada, Shogo Kinoshita, Osamu Ono, Minoru Komuro, Issei ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is associated with adverse events in patients undergoing heart transplant (HTx), although studies directly comparing tacrolimus (TAC) versus cyclosporin A (CsA), especially in combination with everolimus and low‐dose CNIs approach, are limited. Thus, we sought to investigate the associations of TAC and CsA with clinical outcomes in HTx recipients, with specific focus on renal function. METHODS AND RESULTS: From August 2007 to February 2017, 72 consecutive patients (39 treated with TAC vs. 33 with CsA) receiving de novo HTx in a single transplant centre were retrospectively evaluated. We used the instrumental variable method to account for unmeasured confounding. The study outcomes were percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) (safety endpoint) and biopsy‐proven acute rejection (efficacy endpoint) within the first year after HTx. The enrolled patients (median age 40 years) were predominantly men (68%). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, including eGFR (64.8 [45.7–96.4] mL/min/1.73 m(2) in TAC vs. 65.6 [57.9–83.0] mL/min/1.73 m(2) for CsA; P = 0.48), other than sex (male, 49% for TAC vs. 91% for CsA; P < 0.001) between the two groups. Within the first year after HTx, 23 (59%) in the TAC group switched mycophenolate mofetil to everolimus, whereas 16 (48%) in the CsA group (P = 0.52). At 12 months, the rates of mortality and end‐stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapies were both 0%. In the instrumental variable analysis, no differences in renal function as well as graft rejection for 1 year after HTx existed between the TAC and CsA groups. These results were similar when taking into account of everolimus use. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of everolimus use with low‐dose CNIs, our analysis using the instrumental variable method showed no differences in renal function as well as graft rejection during the first year after HTx between HTx recipients who received TAC or CsA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7373882/ /pubmed/32445260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12749 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Shiraishi, Yasuyuki
Amiya, Eisuke
Hatano, Masaru
Katsuki, Toshiomi
Bujo, Chie
Tsuji, Masaki
Nitta, Daisuke
Maki, Hisataka
Ishida, Junichi
Kagami, Yukie
Endo, Miyoko
Kimura, Mitsutoshi
Ando, Masahiko
Shimada, Shogo
Kinoshita, Osamu
Ono, Minoru
Komuro, Issei
Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant
title Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant
title_full Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant
title_fullStr Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant
title_full_unstemmed Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant
title_short Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant
title_sort impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin a on renal function during the first year after heart transplant
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32445260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12749
work_keys_str_mv AT shiraishiyasuyuki impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT amiyaeisuke impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT hatanomasaru impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT katsukitoshiomi impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT bujochie impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT tsujimasaki impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT nittadaisuke impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT makihisataka impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT ishidajunichi impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT kagamiyukie impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT endomiyoko impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT kimuramitsutoshi impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT andomasahiko impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT shimadashogo impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT kinoshitaosamu impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT onominoru impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant
AT komuroissei impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant