Cargando…
Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant
AIMS: Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is associated with adverse events in patients undergoing heart transplant (HTx), although studies directly comparing tacrolimus (TAC) versus cyclosporin A (CsA), especially in combination with everolimus and low‐dose CNIs approach, are limited. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32445260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12749 |
_version_ | 1783561579997954048 |
---|---|
author | Shiraishi, Yasuyuki Amiya, Eisuke Hatano, Masaru Katsuki, Toshiomi Bujo, Chie Tsuji, Masaki Nitta, Daisuke Maki, Hisataka Ishida, Junichi Kagami, Yukie Endo, Miyoko Kimura, Mitsutoshi Ando, Masahiko Shimada, Shogo Kinoshita, Osamu Ono, Minoru Komuro, Issei |
author_facet | Shiraishi, Yasuyuki Amiya, Eisuke Hatano, Masaru Katsuki, Toshiomi Bujo, Chie Tsuji, Masaki Nitta, Daisuke Maki, Hisataka Ishida, Junichi Kagami, Yukie Endo, Miyoko Kimura, Mitsutoshi Ando, Masahiko Shimada, Shogo Kinoshita, Osamu Ono, Minoru Komuro, Issei |
author_sort | Shiraishi, Yasuyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is associated with adverse events in patients undergoing heart transplant (HTx), although studies directly comparing tacrolimus (TAC) versus cyclosporin A (CsA), especially in combination with everolimus and low‐dose CNIs approach, are limited. Thus, we sought to investigate the associations of TAC and CsA with clinical outcomes in HTx recipients, with specific focus on renal function. METHODS AND RESULTS: From August 2007 to February 2017, 72 consecutive patients (39 treated with TAC vs. 33 with CsA) receiving de novo HTx in a single transplant centre were retrospectively evaluated. We used the instrumental variable method to account for unmeasured confounding. The study outcomes were percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) (safety endpoint) and biopsy‐proven acute rejection (efficacy endpoint) within the first year after HTx. The enrolled patients (median age 40 years) were predominantly men (68%). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, including eGFR (64.8 [45.7–96.4] mL/min/1.73 m(2) in TAC vs. 65.6 [57.9–83.0] mL/min/1.73 m(2) for CsA; P = 0.48), other than sex (male, 49% for TAC vs. 91% for CsA; P < 0.001) between the two groups. Within the first year after HTx, 23 (59%) in the TAC group switched mycophenolate mofetil to everolimus, whereas 16 (48%) in the CsA group (P = 0.52). At 12 months, the rates of mortality and end‐stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapies were both 0%. In the instrumental variable analysis, no differences in renal function as well as graft rejection for 1 year after HTx existed between the TAC and CsA groups. These results were similar when taking into account of everolimus use. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of everolimus use with low‐dose CNIs, our analysis using the instrumental variable method showed no differences in renal function as well as graft rejection during the first year after HTx between HTx recipients who received TAC or CsA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7373882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73738822020-07-22 Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant Shiraishi, Yasuyuki Amiya, Eisuke Hatano, Masaru Katsuki, Toshiomi Bujo, Chie Tsuji, Masaki Nitta, Daisuke Maki, Hisataka Ishida, Junichi Kagami, Yukie Endo, Miyoko Kimura, Mitsutoshi Ando, Masahiko Shimada, Shogo Kinoshita, Osamu Ono, Minoru Komuro, Issei ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is associated with adverse events in patients undergoing heart transplant (HTx), although studies directly comparing tacrolimus (TAC) versus cyclosporin A (CsA), especially in combination with everolimus and low‐dose CNIs approach, are limited. Thus, we sought to investigate the associations of TAC and CsA with clinical outcomes in HTx recipients, with specific focus on renal function. METHODS AND RESULTS: From August 2007 to February 2017, 72 consecutive patients (39 treated with TAC vs. 33 with CsA) receiving de novo HTx in a single transplant centre were retrospectively evaluated. We used the instrumental variable method to account for unmeasured confounding. The study outcomes were percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) (safety endpoint) and biopsy‐proven acute rejection (efficacy endpoint) within the first year after HTx. The enrolled patients (median age 40 years) were predominantly men (68%). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, including eGFR (64.8 [45.7–96.4] mL/min/1.73 m(2) in TAC vs. 65.6 [57.9–83.0] mL/min/1.73 m(2) for CsA; P = 0.48), other than sex (male, 49% for TAC vs. 91% for CsA; P < 0.001) between the two groups. Within the first year after HTx, 23 (59%) in the TAC group switched mycophenolate mofetil to everolimus, whereas 16 (48%) in the CsA group (P = 0.52). At 12 months, the rates of mortality and end‐stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapies were both 0%. In the instrumental variable analysis, no differences in renal function as well as graft rejection for 1 year after HTx existed between the TAC and CsA groups. These results were similar when taking into account of everolimus use. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of everolimus use with low‐dose CNIs, our analysis using the instrumental variable method showed no differences in renal function as well as graft rejection during the first year after HTx between HTx recipients who received TAC or CsA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7373882/ /pubmed/32445260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12749 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Shiraishi, Yasuyuki Amiya, Eisuke Hatano, Masaru Katsuki, Toshiomi Bujo, Chie Tsuji, Masaki Nitta, Daisuke Maki, Hisataka Ishida, Junichi Kagami, Yukie Endo, Miyoko Kimura, Mitsutoshi Ando, Masahiko Shimada, Shogo Kinoshita, Osamu Ono, Minoru Komuro, Issei Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant |
title | Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant |
title_full | Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant |
title_fullStr | Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant |
title_short | Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A on renal function during the first year after heart transplant |
title_sort | impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin a on renal function during the first year after heart transplant |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32445260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12749 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shiraishiyasuyuki impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT amiyaeisuke impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT hatanomasaru impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT katsukitoshiomi impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT bujochie impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT tsujimasaki impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT nittadaisuke impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT makihisataka impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT ishidajunichi impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT kagamiyukie impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT endomiyoko impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT kimuramitsutoshi impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT andomasahiko impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT shimadashogo impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT kinoshitaosamu impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT onominoru impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant AT komuroissei impactoftacrolimusversuscyclosporinaonrenalfunctionduringthefirstyearafterhearttransplant |