Cargando…

Is immunological recovery clinically relevant at 100 days after allogeneic transplantation?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Immune reconstitution following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is affected by multiple variables during the transplantation. METHODS: We assessed the clinical factors contributing to immune function reconstitution at 100 days post-allogeneic HSCT in 114 pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jin, Lim, Sung Hee, Kim, Se Hyung, Yun, Jina, Kim, Chan Kyu, Lee, Sang Cheol, Won, Jong Ho, Hong, Dae Sik, Park, Seong Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32306712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.414
_version_ 1783561596769927168
author Park, Jin
Lim, Sung Hee
Kim, Se Hyung
Yun, Jina
Kim, Chan Kyu
Lee, Sang Cheol
Won, Jong Ho
Hong, Dae Sik
Park, Seong Kyu
author_facet Park, Jin
Lim, Sung Hee
Kim, Se Hyung
Yun, Jina
Kim, Chan Kyu
Lee, Sang Cheol
Won, Jong Ho
Hong, Dae Sik
Park, Seong Kyu
author_sort Park, Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Immune reconstitution following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is affected by multiple variables during the transplantation. METHODS: We assessed the clinical factors contributing to immune function reconstitution at 100 days post-allogeneic HSCT in 114 patients receiving fludarabine-based conditioning. Immunophenotypic analysis using flow cytometry was performed to evaluate the percentage and the absolute numbers of T-cell subsets, natural killer cells, and B-cells as clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Tacrolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, T-cell depletion, and acute GVHD were significantly associated with delayed immune reconstitution of T-cell subsets. The incidence of chronic GVHD was significantly increased in the normal recovery group compared to the abnormal group (p = 0.01). Epstein-Barr virus reactivation was more frequently observed in the abnormal group of T-cell subsets (p = 0.045). All viral reactivation events including cytomegalovirus reactivation appeared to be more frequent in the abnormal group of T-cell subsets. CONCLUSIONS: The immune recovery status post-allogeneic HSCT was affected by GVHD prophylactic regimens, especially in cases receiving tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis, T-cell depletion, and possibly those manifesting acute GVHD. Delayed immune reconstitution might increase the morbidity due to viral reactivation. Treatment strategies are needed to prevent infectious complications and enhance immune reconstitution based on the immune recovery status following allogeneic HSCT with fludarabine-based conditioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7373953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73739532020-07-29 Is immunological recovery clinically relevant at 100 days after allogeneic transplantation? Park, Jin Lim, Sung Hee Kim, Se Hyung Yun, Jina Kim, Chan Kyu Lee, Sang Cheol Won, Jong Ho Hong, Dae Sik Park, Seong Kyu Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Immune reconstitution following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is affected by multiple variables during the transplantation. METHODS: We assessed the clinical factors contributing to immune function reconstitution at 100 days post-allogeneic HSCT in 114 patients receiving fludarabine-based conditioning. Immunophenotypic analysis using flow cytometry was performed to evaluate the percentage and the absolute numbers of T-cell subsets, natural killer cells, and B-cells as clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Tacrolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, T-cell depletion, and acute GVHD were significantly associated with delayed immune reconstitution of T-cell subsets. The incidence of chronic GVHD was significantly increased in the normal recovery group compared to the abnormal group (p = 0.01). Epstein-Barr virus reactivation was more frequently observed in the abnormal group of T-cell subsets (p = 0.045). All viral reactivation events including cytomegalovirus reactivation appeared to be more frequent in the abnormal group of T-cell subsets. CONCLUSIONS: The immune recovery status post-allogeneic HSCT was affected by GVHD prophylactic regimens, especially in cases receiving tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis, T-cell depletion, and possibly those manifesting acute GVHD. Delayed immune reconstitution might increase the morbidity due to viral reactivation. Treatment strategies are needed to prevent infectious complications and enhance immune reconstitution based on the immune recovery status following allogeneic HSCT with fludarabine-based conditioning. The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2020-07 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7373953/ /pubmed/32306712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.414 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Jin
Lim, Sung Hee
Kim, Se Hyung
Yun, Jina
Kim, Chan Kyu
Lee, Sang Cheol
Won, Jong Ho
Hong, Dae Sik
Park, Seong Kyu
Is immunological recovery clinically relevant at 100 days after allogeneic transplantation?
title Is immunological recovery clinically relevant at 100 days after allogeneic transplantation?
title_full Is immunological recovery clinically relevant at 100 days after allogeneic transplantation?
title_fullStr Is immunological recovery clinically relevant at 100 days after allogeneic transplantation?
title_full_unstemmed Is immunological recovery clinically relevant at 100 days after allogeneic transplantation?
title_short Is immunological recovery clinically relevant at 100 days after allogeneic transplantation?
title_sort is immunological recovery clinically relevant at 100 days after allogeneic transplantation?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7373953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32306712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.414
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjin isimmunologicalrecoveryclinicallyrelevantat100daysafterallogeneictransplantation
AT limsunghee isimmunologicalrecoveryclinicallyrelevantat100daysafterallogeneictransplantation
AT kimsehyung isimmunologicalrecoveryclinicallyrelevantat100daysafterallogeneictransplantation
AT yunjina isimmunologicalrecoveryclinicallyrelevantat100daysafterallogeneictransplantation
AT kimchankyu isimmunologicalrecoveryclinicallyrelevantat100daysafterallogeneictransplantation
AT leesangcheol isimmunologicalrecoveryclinicallyrelevantat100daysafterallogeneictransplantation
AT wonjongho isimmunologicalrecoveryclinicallyrelevantat100daysafterallogeneictransplantation
AT hongdaesik isimmunologicalrecoveryclinicallyrelevantat100daysafterallogeneictransplantation
AT parkseongkyu isimmunologicalrecoveryclinicallyrelevantat100daysafterallogeneictransplantation