Cargando…
Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts
Purpose To evaluate small-size hamstring (HS) autografts for biomechanical properties and determine a threshold diameter necessary for appropriate reconstruction. Methods In a controlled laboratory setting, biomechanical testing was performed upon 15 hamstring autografts. The grafts were divided int...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32714668 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8728 |
_version_ | 1783561663794905088 |
---|---|
author | Haupt, Edward OKeefe, Kevin J Clay, Terry B Kenney, Nicholas Farmer, Kevin W |
author_facet | Haupt, Edward OKeefe, Kevin J Clay, Terry B Kenney, Nicholas Farmer, Kevin W |
author_sort | Haupt, Edward |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose To evaluate small-size hamstring (HS) autografts for biomechanical properties and determine a threshold diameter necessary for appropriate reconstruction. Methods In a controlled laboratory setting, biomechanical testing was performed upon 15 hamstring autografts. The grafts were divided into three groups by diameter, with five grafts each at diameter sizes of 6, 7, and 8 mm. Testing of the specimens was performed using an MTS 858 (Materials Testing System, Eden Prairie, MN). We determined load to failure by looking at the maximum load as well as the stiffness of the graft. Statistical analysis was performed via analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing with Tukey's post-hoc test and P-values set at 0.05. Results There was a significant difference in ultimate tensile strength for the different size grafts: 1990 +/- 302.42 N for 6 mm grafts (n=5), 2179 +/- 685.36 N for the 7 mm grafts (n=5), and 3074 +/- 781 N for 8 mm grafts (n=5). This was statistically significant for the group overall (p=0.039), as well as between the 6 mm and 8 mm grafts (p=0.044). Graft stiffness for the 6 mm grafts was 317 +/- 85 N (n=5), 288.6 +/- 66 for 7 mm grafts (n=5), and 428.053 +/- 83 for 8 mm grafts (n=5). This achieved statistical significance for the group overall (p =0.037) as well as between the 8 mm and 7 mm grafts. Conclusions The biomechanical data presented here demonstrate that graft diameter is highly correlated with ultimate tensile strength and stiffness. Clinical relevance When viewing this biomechanical data in conjunction with prior clinical data, consideration should be given for the supplementation of an HS autograft as the size decreases below 8 mm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7374285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73742852020-07-23 Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts Haupt, Edward OKeefe, Kevin J Clay, Terry B Kenney, Nicholas Farmer, Kevin W Cureus Orthopedics Purpose To evaluate small-size hamstring (HS) autografts for biomechanical properties and determine a threshold diameter necessary for appropriate reconstruction. Methods In a controlled laboratory setting, biomechanical testing was performed upon 15 hamstring autografts. The grafts were divided into three groups by diameter, with five grafts each at diameter sizes of 6, 7, and 8 mm. Testing of the specimens was performed using an MTS 858 (Materials Testing System, Eden Prairie, MN). We determined load to failure by looking at the maximum load as well as the stiffness of the graft. Statistical analysis was performed via analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing with Tukey's post-hoc test and P-values set at 0.05. Results There was a significant difference in ultimate tensile strength for the different size grafts: 1990 +/- 302.42 N for 6 mm grafts (n=5), 2179 +/- 685.36 N for the 7 mm grafts (n=5), and 3074 +/- 781 N for 8 mm grafts (n=5). This was statistically significant for the group overall (p=0.039), as well as between the 6 mm and 8 mm grafts (p=0.044). Graft stiffness for the 6 mm grafts was 317 +/- 85 N (n=5), 288.6 +/- 66 for 7 mm grafts (n=5), and 428.053 +/- 83 for 8 mm grafts (n=5). This achieved statistical significance for the group overall (p =0.037) as well as between the 8 mm and 7 mm grafts. Conclusions The biomechanical data presented here demonstrate that graft diameter is highly correlated with ultimate tensile strength and stiffness. Clinical relevance When viewing this biomechanical data in conjunction with prior clinical data, consideration should be given for the supplementation of an HS autograft as the size decreases below 8 mm. Cureus 2020-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7374285/ /pubmed/32714668 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8728 Text en Copyright © 2020, Haupt et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Orthopedics Haupt, Edward OKeefe, Kevin J Clay, Terry B Kenney, Nicholas Farmer, Kevin W Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts |
title | Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts |
title_full | Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts |
title_short | Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts |
title_sort | biomechanical properties of small-size hamstring autografts |
topic | Orthopedics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32714668 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hauptedward biomechanicalpropertiesofsmallsizehamstringautografts AT okeefekevinj biomechanicalpropertiesofsmallsizehamstringautografts AT clayterryb biomechanicalpropertiesofsmallsizehamstringautografts AT kenneynicholas biomechanicalpropertiesofsmallsizehamstringautografts AT farmerkevinw biomechanicalpropertiesofsmallsizehamstringautografts |