Cargando…

Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts

Purpose To evaluate small-size hamstring (HS) autografts for biomechanical properties and determine a threshold diameter necessary for appropriate reconstruction. Methods In a controlled laboratory setting, biomechanical testing was performed upon 15 hamstring autografts. The grafts were divided int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haupt, Edward, OKeefe, Kevin J, Clay, Terry B, Kenney, Nicholas, Farmer, Kevin W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32714668
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8728
_version_ 1783561663794905088
author Haupt, Edward
OKeefe, Kevin J
Clay, Terry B
Kenney, Nicholas
Farmer, Kevin W
author_facet Haupt, Edward
OKeefe, Kevin J
Clay, Terry B
Kenney, Nicholas
Farmer, Kevin W
author_sort Haupt, Edward
collection PubMed
description Purpose To evaluate small-size hamstring (HS) autografts for biomechanical properties and determine a threshold diameter necessary for appropriate reconstruction. Methods In a controlled laboratory setting, biomechanical testing was performed upon 15 hamstring autografts. The grafts were divided into three groups by diameter, with five grafts each at diameter sizes of 6, 7, and 8 mm. Testing of the specimens was performed using an MTS 858 (Materials Testing System, Eden Prairie, MN). We determined load to failure by looking at the maximum load as well as the stiffness of the graft. Statistical analysis was performed via analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing with Tukey's post-hoc test and P-values set at 0.05. Results There was a significant difference in ultimate tensile strength for the different size grafts: 1990 +/- 302.42 N for 6 mm grafts (n=5), 2179 +/- 685.36 N for the 7 mm grafts (n=5), and 3074 +/- 781 N for 8 mm grafts (n=5). This was statistically significant for the group overall (p=0.039), as well as between the 6 mm and 8 mm grafts (p=0.044). Graft stiffness for the 6 mm grafts was 317 +/- 85 N (n=5), 288.6 +/- 66 for 7 mm grafts (n=5), and 428.053 +/- 83 for 8 mm grafts (n=5). This achieved statistical significance for the group overall (p =0.037) as well as between the 8 mm and 7 mm grafts. Conclusions The biomechanical data presented here demonstrate that graft diameter is highly correlated with ultimate tensile strength and stiffness. Clinical relevance When viewing this biomechanical data in conjunction with prior clinical data, consideration should be given for the supplementation of an HS autograft as the size decreases below 8 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7374285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73742852020-07-23 Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts Haupt, Edward OKeefe, Kevin J Clay, Terry B Kenney, Nicholas Farmer, Kevin W Cureus Orthopedics Purpose To evaluate small-size hamstring (HS) autografts for biomechanical properties and determine a threshold diameter necessary for appropriate reconstruction. Methods In a controlled laboratory setting, biomechanical testing was performed upon 15 hamstring autografts. The grafts were divided into three groups by diameter, with five grafts each at diameter sizes of 6, 7, and 8 mm. Testing of the specimens was performed using an MTS 858 (Materials Testing System, Eden Prairie, MN). We determined load to failure by looking at the maximum load as well as the stiffness of the graft. Statistical analysis was performed via analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing with Tukey's post-hoc test and P-values set at 0.05. Results There was a significant difference in ultimate tensile strength for the different size grafts: 1990 +/- 302.42 N for 6 mm grafts (n=5), 2179 +/- 685.36 N for the 7 mm grafts (n=5), and 3074 +/- 781 N for 8 mm grafts (n=5). This was statistically significant for the group overall (p=0.039), as well as between the 6 mm and 8 mm grafts (p=0.044). Graft stiffness for the 6 mm grafts was 317 +/- 85 N (n=5), 288.6 +/- 66 for 7 mm grafts (n=5), and 428.053 +/- 83 for 8 mm grafts (n=5). This achieved statistical significance for the group overall (p =0.037) as well as between the 8 mm and 7 mm grafts. Conclusions The biomechanical data presented here demonstrate that graft diameter is highly correlated with ultimate tensile strength and stiffness. Clinical relevance When viewing this biomechanical data in conjunction with prior clinical data, consideration should be given for the supplementation of an HS autograft as the size decreases below 8 mm. Cureus 2020-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7374285/ /pubmed/32714668 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8728 Text en Copyright © 2020, Haupt et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Haupt, Edward
OKeefe, Kevin J
Clay, Terry B
Kenney, Nicholas
Farmer, Kevin W
Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts
title Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts
title_full Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts
title_fullStr Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts
title_short Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts
title_sort biomechanical properties of small-size hamstring autografts
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32714668
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8728
work_keys_str_mv AT hauptedward biomechanicalpropertiesofsmallsizehamstringautografts
AT okeefekevinj biomechanicalpropertiesofsmallsizehamstringautografts
AT clayterryb biomechanicalpropertiesofsmallsizehamstringautografts
AT kenneynicholas biomechanicalpropertiesofsmallsizehamstringautografts
AT farmerkevinw biomechanicalpropertiesofsmallsizehamstringautografts