Cargando…

Comparing Person-Specific and Independent Models on Subject-Dependent and Independent Human Activity Recognition Performance †

The distinction between subject-dependent and subject-independent performance is ubiquitous in the human activity recognition (HAR) literature. We assess whether HAR models really do achieve better subject-dependent performance than subject-independent performance, whether a model trained with data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scheurer, Sebastian, Tedesco, Salvatore, O’Flynn, Brendan, Brown, Kenneth N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610614
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20133647
Descripción
Sumario:The distinction between subject-dependent and subject-independent performance is ubiquitous in the human activity recognition (HAR) literature. We assess whether HAR models really do achieve better subject-dependent performance than subject-independent performance, whether a model trained with data from many users achieves better subject-independent performance than one trained with data from a single person, and whether one trained with data from a single specific target user performs better for that user than one trained with data from many. To those ends, we compare four popular machine learning algorithms’ subject-dependent and subject-independent performances across eight datasets using three different personalisation–generalisation approaches, which we term person-independent models (PIMs), person-specific models (PSMs), and ensembles of PSMs (EPSMs). We further consider three different ways to construct such an ensemble: unweighted, [Formula: see text]-weighted, and baseline-feature-weighted. Our analysis shows that PSMs outperform PIMs by 43.5% in terms of their subject-dependent performances, whereas PIMs outperform PSMs by 55.9% and [Formula: see text]-weighted EPSMs—the best-performing EPSM type—by 16.4% in terms of the subject-independent performance.