Cargando…
Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands
BACKGROUND: Delay in detection of breast cancer may worsen tumour characteristics, with progression of tumour size and a higher risk of metastatic lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall for the same mammographic abnormality at...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0870-2 |
_version_ | 1783561717953855488 |
---|---|
author | Lameijer, Joost R. C. Voogd, Adri C. Pijnappel, Ruud M. Setz-Pels, Wikke Broeders, Mireille J. Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G. Duijm, Lucien E. M. |
author_facet | Lameijer, Joost R. C. Voogd, Adri C. Pijnappel, Ruud M. Setz-Pels, Wikke Broeders, Mireille J. Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G. Duijm, Lucien E. M. |
author_sort | Lameijer, Joost R. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Delay in detection of breast cancer may worsen tumour characteristics, with progression of tumour size and a higher risk of metastatic lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall for the same mammographic abnormality at screening. METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed in two cohorts of women enrolled in a mammography screening programme in the Netherlands. All women aged 50−75 who underwent biennial screening mammography either between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2006 (cohort 1) or between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 (cohort 2) were included. RESULTS: The cohorts showed no difference in proportions of women with delayed breast cancer diagnosis of at least 2 years (2.2% versus 2.8%, P = 0.29). Most delays were caused by incorrect BI-RADS classifications after recall (74.2%). An increase in mean tumour size was seen when comparing sizes at initial false-negative recall and at diagnosis of breast cancer (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of women with a long delay in breast cancer confirmation following repeated recall at screening mammography has not decreased during 20 years of screening. These delays lead to larger tumour size at detection and may negatively influence prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7374543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73745432021-05-11 Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands Lameijer, Joost R. C. Voogd, Adri C. Pijnappel, Ruud M. Setz-Pels, Wikke Broeders, Mireille J. Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G. Duijm, Lucien E. M. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Delay in detection of breast cancer may worsen tumour characteristics, with progression of tumour size and a higher risk of metastatic lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall for the same mammographic abnormality at screening. METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed in two cohorts of women enrolled in a mammography screening programme in the Netherlands. All women aged 50−75 who underwent biennial screening mammography either between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2006 (cohort 1) or between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 (cohort 2) were included. RESULTS: The cohorts showed no difference in proportions of women with delayed breast cancer diagnosis of at least 2 years (2.2% versus 2.8%, P = 0.29). Most delays were caused by incorrect BI-RADS classifications after recall (74.2%). An increase in mean tumour size was seen when comparing sizes at initial false-negative recall and at diagnosis of breast cancer (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of women with a long delay in breast cancer confirmation following repeated recall at screening mammography has not decreased during 20 years of screening. These delays lead to larger tumour size at detection and may negatively influence prognosis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-11 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7374543/ /pubmed/32390006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0870-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Article Lameijer, Joost R. C. Voogd, Adri C. Pijnappel, Ruud M. Setz-Pels, Wikke Broeders, Mireille J. Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G. Duijm, Lucien E. M. Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands |
title | Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands |
title_full | Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands |
title_fullStr | Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands |
title_short | Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands |
title_sort | delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the netherlands |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0870-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lameijerjoostrc delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands AT voogdadric delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands AT pijnappelruudm delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands AT setzpelswikke delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands AT broedersmireillej delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands AT tjanheijnenviviannecg delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands AT duijmlucienem delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands |