Cargando…

Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands

BACKGROUND: Delay in detection of breast cancer may worsen tumour characteristics, with progression of tumour size and a higher risk of metastatic lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall for the same mammographic abnormality at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lameijer, Joost R. C., Voogd, Adri C., Pijnappel, Ruud M., Setz-Pels, Wikke, Broeders, Mireille J., Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G., Duijm, Lucien E. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0870-2
_version_ 1783561717953855488
author Lameijer, Joost R. C.
Voogd, Adri C.
Pijnappel, Ruud M.
Setz-Pels, Wikke
Broeders, Mireille J.
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
Duijm, Lucien E. M.
author_facet Lameijer, Joost R. C.
Voogd, Adri C.
Pijnappel, Ruud M.
Setz-Pels, Wikke
Broeders, Mireille J.
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
Duijm, Lucien E. M.
author_sort Lameijer, Joost R. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delay in detection of breast cancer may worsen tumour characteristics, with progression of tumour size and a higher risk of metastatic lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall for the same mammographic abnormality at screening. METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed in two cohorts of women enrolled in a mammography screening programme in the Netherlands. All women aged 50−75 who underwent biennial screening mammography either between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2006 (cohort 1) or between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 (cohort 2) were included. RESULTS: The cohorts showed no difference in proportions of women with delayed breast cancer diagnosis of at least 2 years (2.2% versus 2.8%, P = 0.29). Most delays were caused by incorrect BI-RADS classifications after recall (74.2%). An increase in mean tumour size was seen when comparing sizes at initial false-negative recall and at diagnosis of breast cancer (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of women with a long delay in breast cancer confirmation following repeated recall at screening mammography has not decreased during 20 years of screening. These delays lead to larger tumour size at detection and may negatively influence prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7374543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73745432021-05-11 Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands Lameijer, Joost R. C. Voogd, Adri C. Pijnappel, Ruud M. Setz-Pels, Wikke Broeders, Mireille J. Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G. Duijm, Lucien E. M. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Delay in detection of breast cancer may worsen tumour characteristics, with progression of tumour size and a higher risk of metastatic lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall for the same mammographic abnormality at screening. METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed in two cohorts of women enrolled in a mammography screening programme in the Netherlands. All women aged 50−75 who underwent biennial screening mammography either between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2006 (cohort 1) or between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 (cohort 2) were included. RESULTS: The cohorts showed no difference in proportions of women with delayed breast cancer diagnosis of at least 2 years (2.2% versus 2.8%, P = 0.29). Most delays were caused by incorrect BI-RADS classifications after recall (74.2%). An increase in mean tumour size was seen when comparing sizes at initial false-negative recall and at diagnosis of breast cancer (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of women with a long delay in breast cancer confirmation following repeated recall at screening mammography has not decreased during 20 years of screening. These delays lead to larger tumour size at detection and may negatively influence prognosis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-11 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7374543/ /pubmed/32390006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0870-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Lameijer, Joost R. C.
Voogd, Adri C.
Pijnappel, Ruud M.
Setz-Pels, Wikke
Broeders, Mireille J.
Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
Duijm, Lucien E. M.
Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands
title Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands
title_full Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands
title_fullStr Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands
title_short Delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the Netherlands
title_sort delayed breast cancer diagnosis after repeated recall at biennial screening mammography: an observational follow-up study from the netherlands
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32390006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0870-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lameijerjoostrc delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands
AT voogdadric delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands
AT pijnappelruudm delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands
AT setzpelswikke delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands
AT broedersmireillej delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands
AT tjanheijnenviviannecg delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands
AT duijmlucienem delayedbreastcancerdiagnosisafterrepeatedrecallatbiennialscreeningmammographyanobservationalfollowupstudyfromthenetherlands