Cargando…
A systematic review and narrative synthesis of data-driven studies in schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits
To tackle the phenotypic heterogeneity of schizophrenia, data-driven methods are often applied to identify subtypes of its symptoms and cognitive deficits. However, a systematic review on this topic is lacking. The objective of this review was to summarize the evidence obtained from longitudinal and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32694510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-00919-x |
_version_ | 1783561732215537664 |
---|---|
author | Habtewold, Tesfa Dejenie Rodijk, Lyan H. Liemburg, Edith J. Sidorenkov, Grigory Boezen, H. Marike Bruggeman, Richard Alizadeh, Behrooz Z. |
author_facet | Habtewold, Tesfa Dejenie Rodijk, Lyan H. Liemburg, Edith J. Sidorenkov, Grigory Boezen, H. Marike Bruggeman, Richard Alizadeh, Behrooz Z. |
author_sort | Habtewold, Tesfa Dejenie |
collection | PubMed |
description | To tackle the phenotypic heterogeneity of schizophrenia, data-driven methods are often applied to identify subtypes of its symptoms and cognitive deficits. However, a systematic review on this topic is lacking. The objective of this review was to summarize the evidence obtained from longitudinal and cross-sectional data-driven studies in positive and negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, their unaffected siblings and healthy controls or individuals from general population. Additionally, we aimed to highlight methodological gaps across studies and point out future directions to optimize the translatability of evidence from data-driven studies. A systematic review was performed through searching PsycINFO, PubMed, PsycTESTS, PsycARTICLES, SCOPUS, EMBASE and Web of Science electronic databases. Both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies published from 2008 to 2019, which reported at least two statistically derived clusters or trajectories were included. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data. In this review, 53 studies (19 longitudinal and 34 cross-sectional) that conducted among 17,822 patients, 8729 unaffected siblings and 5520 controls or general population were included. Most longitudinal studies found four trajectories that characterized by stability, progressive deterioration, relapsing and progressive amelioration of symptoms and cognitive function. Cross-sectional studies commonly identified three clusters with low, intermediate (mixed) and high psychotic symptoms and cognitive profiles. Moreover, identified subgroups were predicted by numerous genetic, sociodemographic and clinical factors. Our findings indicate that schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits are heterogeneous, although methodological limitations across studies are observed. Identified clusters and trajectories along with their predictors may be used to base the implementation of personalized treatment and develop a risk prediction model for high-risk individuals with prodromal symptoms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7374614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73746142020-07-24 A systematic review and narrative synthesis of data-driven studies in schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits Habtewold, Tesfa Dejenie Rodijk, Lyan H. Liemburg, Edith J. Sidorenkov, Grigory Boezen, H. Marike Bruggeman, Richard Alizadeh, Behrooz Z. Transl Psychiatry Review Article To tackle the phenotypic heterogeneity of schizophrenia, data-driven methods are often applied to identify subtypes of its symptoms and cognitive deficits. However, a systematic review on this topic is lacking. The objective of this review was to summarize the evidence obtained from longitudinal and cross-sectional data-driven studies in positive and negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, their unaffected siblings and healthy controls or individuals from general population. Additionally, we aimed to highlight methodological gaps across studies and point out future directions to optimize the translatability of evidence from data-driven studies. A systematic review was performed through searching PsycINFO, PubMed, PsycTESTS, PsycARTICLES, SCOPUS, EMBASE and Web of Science electronic databases. Both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies published from 2008 to 2019, which reported at least two statistically derived clusters or trajectories were included. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data. In this review, 53 studies (19 longitudinal and 34 cross-sectional) that conducted among 17,822 patients, 8729 unaffected siblings and 5520 controls or general population were included. Most longitudinal studies found four trajectories that characterized by stability, progressive deterioration, relapsing and progressive amelioration of symptoms and cognitive function. Cross-sectional studies commonly identified three clusters with low, intermediate (mixed) and high psychotic symptoms and cognitive profiles. Moreover, identified subgroups were predicted by numerous genetic, sociodemographic and clinical factors. Our findings indicate that schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits are heterogeneous, although methodological limitations across studies are observed. Identified clusters and trajectories along with their predictors may be used to base the implementation of personalized treatment and develop a risk prediction model for high-risk individuals with prodromal symptoms. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7374614/ /pubmed/32694510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-00919-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Habtewold, Tesfa Dejenie Rodijk, Lyan H. Liemburg, Edith J. Sidorenkov, Grigory Boezen, H. Marike Bruggeman, Richard Alizadeh, Behrooz Z. A systematic review and narrative synthesis of data-driven studies in schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits |
title | A systematic review and narrative synthesis of data-driven studies in schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits |
title_full | A systematic review and narrative synthesis of data-driven studies in schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and narrative synthesis of data-driven studies in schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and narrative synthesis of data-driven studies in schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits |
title_short | A systematic review and narrative synthesis of data-driven studies in schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits |
title_sort | systematic review and narrative synthesis of data-driven studies in schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32694510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-00919-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT habtewoldtesfadejenie asystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT rodijklyanh asystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT liemburgedithj asystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT sidorenkovgrigory asystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT boezenhmarike asystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT bruggemanrichard asystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT alizadehbehroozz asystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT habtewoldtesfadejenie systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT rodijklyanh systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT liemburgedithj systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT sidorenkovgrigory systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT boezenhmarike systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT bruggemanrichard systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits AT alizadehbehroozz systematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofdatadrivenstudiesinschizophreniasymptomsandcognitivedeficits |