Cargando…

Total knee arthroplasty following intramedullary tibial nailing

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the setting of previous periarticular hardware increases resource utilization, readmissions, complications, and revision rates. Despite the frequency of intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation for tibial fractures, little guidance exists on the manag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Evan J., Heng, Marilyn, Bedair, Hany S., Melnic, Christopher M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32693822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00055-2
_version_ 1783561765462736896
author Smith, Evan J.
Heng, Marilyn
Bedair, Hany S.
Melnic, Christopher M.
author_facet Smith, Evan J.
Heng, Marilyn
Bedair, Hany S.
Melnic, Christopher M.
author_sort Smith, Evan J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the setting of previous periarticular hardware increases resource utilization, readmissions, complications, and revision rates. Despite the frequency of intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation for tibial fractures, little guidance exists on the management of these patients and no series have reported on outcomes of patients undergoing TKA in the setting of a retained or removed IMN. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients who underwent TKA after IMN fixation of tibial fractures. Patient and case data, including need for hardware removal, staged vs non-staged procedures, operative time, and need for revision implants, were recorded. Postoperative data, including complications and revision, were recorded. Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was performed at follow-up. RESULTS: Nine patients were identified consisting of eight women and one man. Follow-up ranged from 0.8–13 years. Non-staged removal of the intramedullary hardware occurred in three cases that had increased operative lengths recorded. There were no complications related to wound healing or infection. No patients required revision. Two of the three patients who underwent non-staged TKA developed arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation. OKS scores in patients who underwent non-staged surgery were consistently low. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion TKA after tibial IMN fixation can result in satisfying outcomes in many patients. However, intramedullary hardware presents challenges to TKA similar to more extensively studied conversion TKA scenarios. Removing hardware in either a staged or non-staged fashion results in increased resource utilization and imparts perioperative challenges with only theoretical benefits of one approach compared to the other. Increased stiffness may be associated with a non-staged approach to hardware removal and TKA. Several technical factors may permit component positioning without removal of hardware. Despite limitations, this is the first series to discuss this challenging clinical scenario and provides surgeons with technical guidance and data on operative outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7374830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73748302020-07-30 Total knee arthroplasty following intramedullary tibial nailing Smith, Evan J. Heng, Marilyn Bedair, Hany S. Melnic, Christopher M. Knee Surg Relat Res Research Article INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the setting of previous periarticular hardware increases resource utilization, readmissions, complications, and revision rates. Despite the frequency of intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation for tibial fractures, little guidance exists on the management of these patients and no series have reported on outcomes of patients undergoing TKA in the setting of a retained or removed IMN. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of patients who underwent TKA after IMN fixation of tibial fractures. Patient and case data, including need for hardware removal, staged vs non-staged procedures, operative time, and need for revision implants, were recorded. Postoperative data, including complications and revision, were recorded. Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was performed at follow-up. RESULTS: Nine patients were identified consisting of eight women and one man. Follow-up ranged from 0.8–13 years. Non-staged removal of the intramedullary hardware occurred in three cases that had increased operative lengths recorded. There were no complications related to wound healing or infection. No patients required revision. Two of the three patients who underwent non-staged TKA developed arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation. OKS scores in patients who underwent non-staged surgery were consistently low. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion TKA after tibial IMN fixation can result in satisfying outcomes in many patients. However, intramedullary hardware presents challenges to TKA similar to more extensively studied conversion TKA scenarios. Removing hardware in either a staged or non-staged fashion results in increased resource utilization and imparts perioperative challenges with only theoretical benefits of one approach compared to the other. Increased stiffness may be associated with a non-staged approach to hardware removal and TKA. Several technical factors may permit component positioning without removal of hardware. Despite limitations, this is the first series to discuss this challenging clinical scenario and provides surgeons with technical guidance and data on operative outcomes. BioMed Central 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7374830/ /pubmed/32693822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00055-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, Evan J.
Heng, Marilyn
Bedair, Hany S.
Melnic, Christopher M.
Total knee arthroplasty following intramedullary tibial nailing
title Total knee arthroplasty following intramedullary tibial nailing
title_full Total knee arthroplasty following intramedullary tibial nailing
title_fullStr Total knee arthroplasty following intramedullary tibial nailing
title_full_unstemmed Total knee arthroplasty following intramedullary tibial nailing
title_short Total knee arthroplasty following intramedullary tibial nailing
title_sort total knee arthroplasty following intramedullary tibial nailing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32693822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00055-2
work_keys_str_mv AT smithevanj totalkneearthroplastyfollowingintramedullarytibialnailing
AT hengmarilyn totalkneearthroplastyfollowingintramedullarytibialnailing
AT bedairhanys totalkneearthroplastyfollowingintramedullarytibialnailing
AT melnicchristopherm totalkneearthroplastyfollowingintramedullarytibialnailing