Cargando…

Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing

BACKGROUND: To determine the average amount of mechanical forces applied to the lids of keratoconus patients during eye rubbing. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients (41 male, 16 female, average age 34.8 years) with a clinically and topographically diagnosed keratoconus and a history of eye rubbing were pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hafezi, Farhad, Hafezi, Nikki L., Pajic, Bojan, Gilardoni, Francesca, Randleman, J. Bradley, Gomes, Jose Alvaro P., Kollros, Léonard, Hillen, Mark, Torres-Netto, Emilio A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01551-5
_version_ 1783561789370269696
author Hafezi, Farhad
Hafezi, Nikki L.
Pajic, Bojan
Gilardoni, Francesca
Randleman, J. Bradley
Gomes, Jose Alvaro P.
Kollros, Léonard
Hillen, Mark
Torres-Netto, Emilio A.
author_facet Hafezi, Farhad
Hafezi, Nikki L.
Pajic, Bojan
Gilardoni, Francesca
Randleman, J. Bradley
Gomes, Jose Alvaro P.
Kollros, Léonard
Hillen, Mark
Torres-Netto, Emilio A.
author_sort Hafezi, Farhad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine the average amount of mechanical forces applied to the lids of keratoconus patients during eye rubbing. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients (41 male, 16 female, average age 34.8 years) with a clinically and topographically diagnosed keratoconus and a history of eye rubbing were prospectively asked to perform their individual eye rubbing movement on a high-precision balance. The type of eye-rubbing movement and the force applied, represented in newtons (N), were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: We detected three different types of eye rubbing. Rubbing with the fingertip was most frequent (51%), followed by rubbing with the knuckle (44%) and rubbing with the fingernail (6%). Each type of eye rubbing showed different average forces, with knuckle type eye rubbing applying significantly more force (9.6 ± 6.3 N) on the lids than fingertip (4.3 ± 3.1 N) and fingernail (2.6 ± 3.3 N) types (p < 0,001 and p = 0,016, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There were major variations in the force exerted on the lids, depending on the type of eye rubbing employed. This data will help determine the forces that need to be applied in future experimental eye rubbing models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7374951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73749512020-07-22 Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing Hafezi, Farhad Hafezi, Nikki L. Pajic, Bojan Gilardoni, Francesca Randleman, J. Bradley Gomes, Jose Alvaro P. Kollros, Léonard Hillen, Mark Torres-Netto, Emilio A. BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To determine the average amount of mechanical forces applied to the lids of keratoconus patients during eye rubbing. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients (41 male, 16 female, average age 34.8 years) with a clinically and topographically diagnosed keratoconus and a history of eye rubbing were prospectively asked to perform their individual eye rubbing movement on a high-precision balance. The type of eye-rubbing movement and the force applied, represented in newtons (N), were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: We detected three different types of eye rubbing. Rubbing with the fingertip was most frequent (51%), followed by rubbing with the knuckle (44%) and rubbing with the fingernail (6%). Each type of eye rubbing showed different average forces, with knuckle type eye rubbing applying significantly more force (9.6 ± 6.3 N) on the lids than fingertip (4.3 ± 3.1 N) and fingernail (2.6 ± 3.3 N) types (p < 0,001 and p = 0,016, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There were major variations in the force exerted on the lids, depending on the type of eye rubbing employed. This data will help determine the forces that need to be applied in future experimental eye rubbing models. BioMed Central 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7374951/ /pubmed/32698803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01551-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hafezi, Farhad
Hafezi, Nikki L.
Pajic, Bojan
Gilardoni, Francesca
Randleman, J. Bradley
Gomes, Jose Alvaro P.
Kollros, Léonard
Hillen, Mark
Torres-Netto, Emilio A.
Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
title Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
title_full Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
title_fullStr Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
title_short Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
title_sort assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7374951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01551-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hafezifarhad assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT hafezinikkil assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT pajicbojan assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT gilardonifrancesca assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT randlemanjbradley assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT gomesjosealvarop assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT kollrosleonard assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT hillenmark assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing
AT torresnettoemilioa assessmentofthemechanicalforcesappliedduringeyerubbing