Cargando…
Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes
AIMS: We assessed adherence and long‐term effects on HbA1c of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in a single diabetes centre. METHODS: In this observational study, we reviewed data files for all 411 patients with type 1 diabetes attending our clinic during a 2‐year period. Adheren...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.125 |
_version_ | 1783561807016755200 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Klavs Würgler |
author_facet | Hansen, Klavs Würgler |
author_sort | Hansen, Klavs Würgler |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: We assessed adherence and long‐term effects on HbA1c of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in a single diabetes centre. METHODS: In this observational study, we reviewed data files for all 411 patients with type 1 diabetes attending our clinic during a 2‐year period. Adherence was reported in those who initiated FGM in our clinic (n = 321). Baseline and final HbA1c were noted for patients who continued FGM for more than 6 months without clinical conditions or interventions at baseline that could interfere with the effect of FGM on glycaemic control (n = 270). RESULTS: After 2 years, the fraction of patients using FGM increased from 3% to 72%. Adherence to FGM was 88%. Baseline and final HbA1c was median (interquartile range) 63 mmol/mol (56, 74) (7.9% (7.3, 8.9)) and 59 mmol/mol (53, 68) (7.6% (7.0, 8.4)), respectively. The estimated difference final‐baseline HbA1c was −4 mmol/mol (95% CI −5, −3) (−0.4% (−0.5, −0.3)) (P < .001). No significant difference was seen for patients with baseline HbA1c ≤ 7% (53 mmol/mol). The interval from initiation of FGM to final HbA1c was median 562 days (IQR 417, 662). The number of scans/day was median 11 (IQR 8, 13) and correlated negatively with both final and baseline HbA1c but not with change in HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Following the introduction of unlimited access, nearly three quarters of the patients were FGM users. Long‐term adherence was good, and HbA1c improved in all patients except in those with optimal glycaemic control at baseline. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7375052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73750522020-07-22 Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes Hansen, Klavs Würgler Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Original Research Articles AIMS: We assessed adherence and long‐term effects on HbA1c of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in a single diabetes centre. METHODS: In this observational study, we reviewed data files for all 411 patients with type 1 diabetes attending our clinic during a 2‐year period. Adherence was reported in those who initiated FGM in our clinic (n = 321). Baseline and final HbA1c were noted for patients who continued FGM for more than 6 months without clinical conditions or interventions at baseline that could interfere with the effect of FGM on glycaemic control (n = 270). RESULTS: After 2 years, the fraction of patients using FGM increased from 3% to 72%. Adherence to FGM was 88%. Baseline and final HbA1c was median (interquartile range) 63 mmol/mol (56, 74) (7.9% (7.3, 8.9)) and 59 mmol/mol (53, 68) (7.6% (7.0, 8.4)), respectively. The estimated difference final‐baseline HbA1c was −4 mmol/mol (95% CI −5, −3) (−0.4% (−0.5, −0.3)) (P < .001). No significant difference was seen for patients with baseline HbA1c ≤ 7% (53 mmol/mol). The interval from initiation of FGM to final HbA1c was median 562 days (IQR 417, 662). The number of scans/day was median 11 (IQR 8, 13) and correlated negatively with both final and baseline HbA1c but not with change in HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Following the introduction of unlimited access, nearly three quarters of the patients were FGM users. Long‐term adherence was good, and HbA1c improved in all patients except in those with optimal glycaemic control at baseline. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7375052/ /pubmed/32704551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.125 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Hansen, Klavs Würgler Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes |
title | Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes |
title_full | Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes |
title_fullStr | Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes |
title_short | Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes |
title_sort | effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenklavswurgler effectsofunrestrictedaccesstoflashglucosemonitoringintype1diabetes |