Cargando…

Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes

AIMS: We assessed adherence and long‐term effects on HbA1c of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in a single diabetes centre. METHODS: In this observational study, we reviewed data files for all 411 patients with type 1 diabetes attending our clinic during a 2‐year period. Adheren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hansen, Klavs Würgler
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.125
_version_ 1783561807016755200
author Hansen, Klavs Würgler
author_facet Hansen, Klavs Würgler
author_sort Hansen, Klavs Würgler
collection PubMed
description AIMS: We assessed adherence and long‐term effects on HbA1c of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in a single diabetes centre. METHODS: In this observational study, we reviewed data files for all 411 patients with type 1 diabetes attending our clinic during a 2‐year period. Adherence was reported in those who initiated FGM in our clinic (n = 321). Baseline and final HbA1c were noted for patients who continued FGM for more than 6 months without clinical conditions or interventions at baseline that could interfere with the effect of FGM on glycaemic control (n = 270). RESULTS: After 2 years, the fraction of patients using FGM increased from 3% to 72%. Adherence to FGM was 88%. Baseline and final HbA1c was median (interquartile range) 63 mmol/mol (56, 74) (7.9% (7.3, 8.9)) and 59 mmol/mol (53, 68) (7.6% (7.0, 8.4)), respectively. The estimated difference final‐baseline HbA1c was −4 mmol/mol (95% CI −5, −3) (−0.4% (−0.5, −0.3)) (P < .001). No significant difference was seen for patients with baseline HbA1c ≤ 7% (53 mmol/mol). The interval from initiation of FGM to final HbA1c was median 562 days (IQR 417, 662). The number of scans/day was median 11 (IQR 8, 13) and correlated negatively with both final and baseline HbA1c but not with change in HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Following the introduction of unlimited access, nearly three quarters of the patients were FGM users. Long‐term adherence was good, and HbA1c improved in all patients except in those with optimal glycaemic control at baseline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7375052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73750522020-07-22 Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes Hansen, Klavs Würgler Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Original Research Articles AIMS: We assessed adherence and long‐term effects on HbA1c of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in a single diabetes centre. METHODS: In this observational study, we reviewed data files for all 411 patients with type 1 diabetes attending our clinic during a 2‐year period. Adherence was reported in those who initiated FGM in our clinic (n = 321). Baseline and final HbA1c were noted for patients who continued FGM for more than 6 months without clinical conditions or interventions at baseline that could interfere with the effect of FGM on glycaemic control (n = 270). RESULTS: After 2 years, the fraction of patients using FGM increased from 3% to 72%. Adherence to FGM was 88%. Baseline and final HbA1c was median (interquartile range) 63 mmol/mol (56, 74) (7.9% (7.3, 8.9)) and 59 mmol/mol (53, 68) (7.6% (7.0, 8.4)), respectively. The estimated difference final‐baseline HbA1c was −4 mmol/mol (95% CI −5, −3) (−0.4% (−0.5, −0.3)) (P < .001). No significant difference was seen for patients with baseline HbA1c ≤ 7% (53 mmol/mol). The interval from initiation of FGM to final HbA1c was median 562 days (IQR 417, 662). The number of scans/day was median 11 (IQR 8, 13) and correlated negatively with both final and baseline HbA1c but not with change in HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Following the introduction of unlimited access, nearly three quarters of the patients were FGM users. Long‐term adherence was good, and HbA1c improved in all patients except in those with optimal glycaemic control at baseline. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7375052/ /pubmed/32704551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.125 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Hansen, Klavs Würgler
Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes
title Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes
title_full Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes
title_fullStr Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes
title_short Effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes
title_sort effects of unrestricted access to flash glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.125
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenklavswurgler effectsofunrestrictedaccesstoflashglucosemonitoringintype1diabetes