Cargando…

Lateralization of facial emotion processing and facial paresis in Vestibular Schwannoma patients

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates whether there exist differences in lateralization of facial emotion processing in patients suffering from Vestibular Schwannoma (VS) based on the presence of a facial paresis and their degree of facial functioning as measured by the House Brackmann Grading scale (H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blom, Stephanie S. A. H., Aarts, Henk, Kunst, Henricus P. M., Wever, Capi C., Semin, Gün R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32396279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1644
_version_ 1783561813390000128
author Blom, Stephanie S. A. H.
Aarts, Henk
Kunst, Henricus P. M.
Wever, Capi C.
Semin, Gün R.
author_facet Blom, Stephanie S. A. H.
Aarts, Henk
Kunst, Henricus P. M.
Wever, Capi C.
Semin, Gün R.
author_sort Blom, Stephanie S. A. H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study investigates whether there exist differences in lateralization of facial emotion processing in patients suffering from Vestibular Schwannoma (VS) based on the presence of a facial paresis and their degree of facial functioning as measured by the House Brackmann Grading scale (HBG). METHODS: Forty‐four VS patients, half of them with a facial paresis and half of them without a facial paresis, rated how emotive they considered images of faces showing emotion in the left versus right visual field. Stimuli consisted of faces with a neutral half and an emotional (happy or angry) half. The study had a mixed design with emotional expression (happy vs. angry) and emotional half (left vs. right visual field) of the faces as repeated measures, and facial paresis (present vs. absent) and HBG as between subjects’ factors. The visual field bias was the main dependent variable. RESULTS: In line with typical findings in the normal population, a left visual field bias showed in the current sample: patients judged emotional expressions shown in the left visual field as more emotive than those shown in the right visual field. No differences in visual field bias showed based on the presence of a facial paresis nor based on patients’ HBG. CONCLUSION: VS patients show a left visual field bias when processing facial emotion. No differences in lateralization showed based on the presence of a facial paresis or on patients’ HBG. Based on this study, facial paresis thus does not affect the lateralization of facial emotion processing in patients with VS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7375079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73750792020-07-22 Lateralization of facial emotion processing and facial paresis in Vestibular Schwannoma patients Blom, Stephanie S. A. H. Aarts, Henk Kunst, Henricus P. M. Wever, Capi C. Semin, Gün R. Brain Behav Original Research OBJECTIVE: This study investigates whether there exist differences in lateralization of facial emotion processing in patients suffering from Vestibular Schwannoma (VS) based on the presence of a facial paresis and their degree of facial functioning as measured by the House Brackmann Grading scale (HBG). METHODS: Forty‐four VS patients, half of them with a facial paresis and half of them without a facial paresis, rated how emotive they considered images of faces showing emotion in the left versus right visual field. Stimuli consisted of faces with a neutral half and an emotional (happy or angry) half. The study had a mixed design with emotional expression (happy vs. angry) and emotional half (left vs. right visual field) of the faces as repeated measures, and facial paresis (present vs. absent) and HBG as between subjects’ factors. The visual field bias was the main dependent variable. RESULTS: In line with typical findings in the normal population, a left visual field bias showed in the current sample: patients judged emotional expressions shown in the left visual field as more emotive than those shown in the right visual field. No differences in visual field bias showed based on the presence of a facial paresis nor based on patients’ HBG. CONCLUSION: VS patients show a left visual field bias when processing facial emotion. No differences in lateralization showed based on the presence of a facial paresis or on patients’ HBG. Based on this study, facial paresis thus does not affect the lateralization of facial emotion processing in patients with VS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7375079/ /pubmed/32396279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1644 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Blom, Stephanie S. A. H.
Aarts, Henk
Kunst, Henricus P. M.
Wever, Capi C.
Semin, Gün R.
Lateralization of facial emotion processing and facial paresis in Vestibular Schwannoma patients
title Lateralization of facial emotion processing and facial paresis in Vestibular Schwannoma patients
title_full Lateralization of facial emotion processing and facial paresis in Vestibular Schwannoma patients
title_fullStr Lateralization of facial emotion processing and facial paresis in Vestibular Schwannoma patients
title_full_unstemmed Lateralization of facial emotion processing and facial paresis in Vestibular Schwannoma patients
title_short Lateralization of facial emotion processing and facial paresis in Vestibular Schwannoma patients
title_sort lateralization of facial emotion processing and facial paresis in vestibular schwannoma patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32396279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1644
work_keys_str_mv AT blomstephaniesah lateralizationoffacialemotionprocessingandfacialparesisinvestibularschwannomapatients
AT aartshenk lateralizationoffacialemotionprocessingandfacialparesisinvestibularschwannomapatients
AT kunsthenricuspm lateralizationoffacialemotionprocessingandfacialparesisinvestibularschwannomapatients
AT wevercapic lateralizationoffacialemotionprocessingandfacialparesisinvestibularschwannomapatients
AT semingunr lateralizationoffacialemotionprocessingandfacialparesisinvestibularschwannomapatients