Cargando…
A response‐locking protocol to boost sensitivity for fMRI‐based neurochronometry
The timeline of brain‐wide neural activity relative to a behavioral event is crucial when decoding the neural implementation of a cognitive process. Yet, fMRI assesses neural processes indirectly via delayed and regionally variable hemodynamics. This method‐inherent temporal distortion impacts the i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32385973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25026 |
_version_ | 1783561814554968064 |
---|---|
author | Viswanathan, Shivakumar Abdollahi, Rouhollah O. Wang, Bin A. Grefkes, Christian Fink, Gereon R. Daun, Silvia |
author_facet | Viswanathan, Shivakumar Abdollahi, Rouhollah O. Wang, Bin A. Grefkes, Christian Fink, Gereon R. Daun, Silvia |
author_sort | Viswanathan, Shivakumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | The timeline of brain‐wide neural activity relative to a behavioral event is crucial when decoding the neural implementation of a cognitive process. Yet, fMRI assesses neural processes indirectly via delayed and regionally variable hemodynamics. This method‐inherent temporal distortion impacts the interpretation of behavior‐linked neural timing. Here we describe a novel behavioral protocol that aims at disentangling the BOLD dynamics of the pre‐ and post‐response periods in response time tasks. We tested this response‐locking protocol in a perceptual decision‐making (random dot) task. Increasing perceptual difficulty produced expected activity increases over a broad network involving the lateral/medial prefrontal cortex and the anterior insula. However, response‐locking revealed a previously unreported functional dissociation within this network. preSMA and anterior premotor cortex (prePMV) showed post‐response activity modulations while anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex did not. Furthermore, post‐response BOLD activity at preSMA showed a modulation in timing but not amplitude while this pattern was reversed at prePMV. These timeline dissociations with response‐locking thus revealed three functionally distinct sub‐networks in what was seemingly one shared distributed network modulated by perceptual difficulty. These findings suggest that our novel response‐locked protocol could boost the timing‐related sensitivity of fMRI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7375084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73750842020-07-22 A response‐locking protocol to boost sensitivity for fMRI‐based neurochronometry Viswanathan, Shivakumar Abdollahi, Rouhollah O. Wang, Bin A. Grefkes, Christian Fink, Gereon R. Daun, Silvia Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles The timeline of brain‐wide neural activity relative to a behavioral event is crucial when decoding the neural implementation of a cognitive process. Yet, fMRI assesses neural processes indirectly via delayed and regionally variable hemodynamics. This method‐inherent temporal distortion impacts the interpretation of behavior‐linked neural timing. Here we describe a novel behavioral protocol that aims at disentangling the BOLD dynamics of the pre‐ and post‐response periods in response time tasks. We tested this response‐locking protocol in a perceptual decision‐making (random dot) task. Increasing perceptual difficulty produced expected activity increases over a broad network involving the lateral/medial prefrontal cortex and the anterior insula. However, response‐locking revealed a previously unreported functional dissociation within this network. preSMA and anterior premotor cortex (prePMV) showed post‐response activity modulations while anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex did not. Furthermore, post‐response BOLD activity at preSMA showed a modulation in timing but not amplitude while this pattern was reversed at prePMV. These timeline dissociations with response‐locking thus revealed three functionally distinct sub‐networks in what was seemingly one shared distributed network modulated by perceptual difficulty. These findings suggest that our novel response‐locked protocol could boost the timing‐related sensitivity of fMRI. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7375084/ /pubmed/32385973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25026 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Viswanathan, Shivakumar Abdollahi, Rouhollah O. Wang, Bin A. Grefkes, Christian Fink, Gereon R. Daun, Silvia A response‐locking protocol to boost sensitivity for fMRI‐based neurochronometry |
title | A response‐locking protocol to boost sensitivity for fMRI‐based neurochronometry |
title_full | A response‐locking protocol to boost sensitivity for fMRI‐based neurochronometry |
title_fullStr | A response‐locking protocol to boost sensitivity for fMRI‐based neurochronometry |
title_full_unstemmed | A response‐locking protocol to boost sensitivity for fMRI‐based neurochronometry |
title_short | A response‐locking protocol to boost sensitivity for fMRI‐based neurochronometry |
title_sort | response‐locking protocol to boost sensitivity for fmri‐based neurochronometry |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32385973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT viswanathanshivakumar aresponselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry AT abdollahirouhollaho aresponselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry AT wangbina aresponselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry AT grefkeschristian aresponselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry AT finkgereonr aresponselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry AT daunsilvia aresponselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry AT viswanathanshivakumar responselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry AT abdollahirouhollaho responselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry AT wangbina responselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry AT grefkeschristian responselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry AT finkgereonr responselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry AT daunsilvia responselockingprotocoltoboostsensitivityforfmribasedneurochronometry |