Cargando…

Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with “less treatment‐resistant” depression by the Maudsley Staging Model

INTRODUCTION: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for patients with mood disorders and is most often used for treatment‐resistant cases. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of ECT in a real‐world treatment sample in a Chinese psychiatric hospital which included both t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yarong, Rosenheck, Robert, Ye, Biyu, Fan, Ni, He, Hongbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32406210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1654
_version_ 1783561815247028224
author Ma, Yarong
Rosenheck, Robert
Ye, Biyu
Fan, Ni
He, Hongbo
author_facet Ma, Yarong
Rosenheck, Robert
Ye, Biyu
Fan, Ni
He, Hongbo
author_sort Ma, Yarong
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for patients with mood disorders and is most often used for treatment‐resistant cases. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of ECT in a real‐world treatment sample in a Chinese psychiatric hospital which included both treatment‐resistant and nontreatment‐resistant patients. METHODS: An observational study of symptom outcomes from admission to the time of discharge was conducted with 37 inpatients diagnosed with unipolar or bipolar depression treated with ECT. Symptom severity was assessed with the 17‐item Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression (HRSD‐17) and treatment‐resistance with the Maudsley Staging Model (MSM). Stratifying at the MSM median admission characteristics and symptom change was compared between patients who were treatment‐resistant (n = 18) and who were not (n = 19). The outcome difference between groups was compared using analyses of covariance adjusted for baseline characteristics including symptom severity, followed by linear regression to identify factors associated symptom improvement in the entire sample. RESULTS: The sample (n = 37) showed moderate treatment‐resistance (MSM = 7.30 ± 1.13) at admission and both groups received 8.3 ± 2 ECT sessions. The treatment‐resistant group had a smaller proportion of bipolar patients and more severe symptoms, but showed no significant difference from the nontreatment‐resistant group in HDRS‐17 scores at the time of discharge (adjusted means = 6.23 ± 1.00 vs. 5.94 ± 0.97, Partial η (2) = 0.001, p = .845). Baseline symptom severity was the strongest correlate of reduction in HDRS‐17 scores (β = 0.891, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Symptom change with ECT in depression did not differ by level of treatment‐resistance but was greatest among those with more severe baseline symptoms. Correlates of ECT effectiveness should be further evaluated in stratified randomized trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7375087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73750872020-07-22 Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with “less treatment‐resistant” depression by the Maudsley Staging Model Ma, Yarong Rosenheck, Robert Ye, Biyu Fan, Ni He, Hongbo Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for patients with mood disorders and is most often used for treatment‐resistant cases. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of ECT in a real‐world treatment sample in a Chinese psychiatric hospital which included both treatment‐resistant and nontreatment‐resistant patients. METHODS: An observational study of symptom outcomes from admission to the time of discharge was conducted with 37 inpatients diagnosed with unipolar or bipolar depression treated with ECT. Symptom severity was assessed with the 17‐item Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression (HRSD‐17) and treatment‐resistance with the Maudsley Staging Model (MSM). Stratifying at the MSM median admission characteristics and symptom change was compared between patients who were treatment‐resistant (n = 18) and who were not (n = 19). The outcome difference between groups was compared using analyses of covariance adjusted for baseline characteristics including symptom severity, followed by linear regression to identify factors associated symptom improvement in the entire sample. RESULTS: The sample (n = 37) showed moderate treatment‐resistance (MSM = 7.30 ± 1.13) at admission and both groups received 8.3 ± 2 ECT sessions. The treatment‐resistant group had a smaller proportion of bipolar patients and more severe symptoms, but showed no significant difference from the nontreatment‐resistant group in HDRS‐17 scores at the time of discharge (adjusted means = 6.23 ± 1.00 vs. 5.94 ± 0.97, Partial η (2) = 0.001, p = .845). Baseline symptom severity was the strongest correlate of reduction in HDRS‐17 scores (β = 0.891, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Symptom change with ECT in depression did not differ by level of treatment‐resistance but was greatest among those with more severe baseline symptoms. Correlates of ECT effectiveness should be further evaluated in stratified randomized trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7375087/ /pubmed/32406210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1654 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ma, Yarong
Rosenheck, Robert
Ye, Biyu
Fan, Ni
He, Hongbo
Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with “less treatment‐resistant” depression by the Maudsley Staging Model
title Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with “less treatment‐resistant” depression by the Maudsley Staging Model
title_full Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with “less treatment‐resistant” depression by the Maudsley Staging Model
title_fullStr Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with “less treatment‐resistant” depression by the Maudsley Staging Model
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with “less treatment‐resistant” depression by the Maudsley Staging Model
title_short Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with “less treatment‐resistant” depression by the Maudsley Staging Model
title_sort effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with “less treatment‐resistant” depression by the maudsley staging model
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32406210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1654
work_keys_str_mv AT mayarong effectivenessofelectroconvulsivetherapyinpatientswithlesstreatmentresistantdepressionbythemaudsleystagingmodel
AT rosenheckrobert effectivenessofelectroconvulsivetherapyinpatientswithlesstreatmentresistantdepressionbythemaudsleystagingmodel
AT yebiyu effectivenessofelectroconvulsivetherapyinpatientswithlesstreatmentresistantdepressionbythemaudsleystagingmodel
AT fanni effectivenessofelectroconvulsivetherapyinpatientswithlesstreatmentresistantdepressionbythemaudsleystagingmodel
AT hehongbo effectivenessofelectroconvulsivetherapyinpatientswithlesstreatmentresistantdepressionbythemaudsleystagingmodel