Cargando…

Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1‐year follow‐up: Comparison of connectomic, structural, and clinical predictors

In a machine learning setting, this study aims to compare the prognostic utility of connectomic, brain structural, and clinical/demographic predictors of individual change in symptom severity in individuals with schizophrenia. Symptom severity at baseline and 1‐year follow‐up was assessed in 30 indi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kottaram, Akhil, Johnston, Leigh A., Tian, Ye, Ganella, Eleni P., Laskaris, Liliana, Cocchi, Luca, McGorry, Patrick, Pantelis, Christos, Kotagiri, Ramamohanarao, Cropley, Vanessa, Zalesky, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25020
_version_ 1783561821436772352
author Kottaram, Akhil
Johnston, Leigh A.
Tian, Ye
Ganella, Eleni P.
Laskaris, Liliana
Cocchi, Luca
McGorry, Patrick
Pantelis, Christos
Kotagiri, Ramamohanarao
Cropley, Vanessa
Zalesky, Andrew
author_facet Kottaram, Akhil
Johnston, Leigh A.
Tian, Ye
Ganella, Eleni P.
Laskaris, Liliana
Cocchi, Luca
McGorry, Patrick
Pantelis, Christos
Kotagiri, Ramamohanarao
Cropley, Vanessa
Zalesky, Andrew
author_sort Kottaram, Akhil
collection PubMed
description In a machine learning setting, this study aims to compare the prognostic utility of connectomic, brain structural, and clinical/demographic predictors of individual change in symptom severity in individuals with schizophrenia. Symptom severity at baseline and 1‐year follow‐up was assessed in 30 individuals with a schizophrenia‐spectrum disorder using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Structural and functional neuroimaging was acquired in all individuals at baseline. Machine learning classifiers were trained to predict whether individuals improved or worsened with respect to positive, negative, and overall symptom severity. Classifiers were trained using various combinations of predictors, including regional cortical thickness and gray matter volume, static and dynamic resting‐state connectivity, and/or baseline clinical and demographic variables. Relative change in overall symptom severity between baseline and 1‐year follow‐up varied markedly among individuals (interquartile range: 55%). Dynamic resting‐state connectivity measured within the default‐mode network was the most accurate single predictor of change in positive (accuracy: 87%), negative (83%), and overall symptom severity (77%) at follow‐up. Incorporating predictors based on regional cortical thickness, gray matter volume, and baseline clinical variables did not markedly improve prediction accuracy and the prognostic utility of these predictors in isolation was moderate (<70%). Worsening negative symptoms at 1‐year follow‐up were predicted by hyper‐connectivity and hypo‐dynamism within the default‐mode network at baseline assessment, while hypo‐connectivity and hyper‐dynamism predicted worsening positive symptoms. Given the modest sample size investigated, we recommend giving precedence to the relative ranking of the predictors investigated in this study, rather than the prediction accuracy estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7375115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73751152020-07-22 Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1‐year follow‐up: Comparison of connectomic, structural, and clinical predictors Kottaram, Akhil Johnston, Leigh A. Tian, Ye Ganella, Eleni P. Laskaris, Liliana Cocchi, Luca McGorry, Patrick Pantelis, Christos Kotagiri, Ramamohanarao Cropley, Vanessa Zalesky, Andrew Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles In a machine learning setting, this study aims to compare the prognostic utility of connectomic, brain structural, and clinical/demographic predictors of individual change in symptom severity in individuals with schizophrenia. Symptom severity at baseline and 1‐year follow‐up was assessed in 30 individuals with a schizophrenia‐spectrum disorder using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Structural and functional neuroimaging was acquired in all individuals at baseline. Machine learning classifiers were trained to predict whether individuals improved or worsened with respect to positive, negative, and overall symptom severity. Classifiers were trained using various combinations of predictors, including regional cortical thickness and gray matter volume, static and dynamic resting‐state connectivity, and/or baseline clinical and demographic variables. Relative change in overall symptom severity between baseline and 1‐year follow‐up varied markedly among individuals (interquartile range: 55%). Dynamic resting‐state connectivity measured within the default‐mode network was the most accurate single predictor of change in positive (accuracy: 87%), negative (83%), and overall symptom severity (77%) at follow‐up. Incorporating predictors based on regional cortical thickness, gray matter volume, and baseline clinical variables did not markedly improve prediction accuracy and the prognostic utility of these predictors in isolation was moderate (<70%). Worsening negative symptoms at 1‐year follow‐up were predicted by hyper‐connectivity and hypo‐dynamism within the default‐mode network at baseline assessment, while hypo‐connectivity and hyper‐dynamism predicted worsening positive symptoms. Given the modest sample size investigated, we recommend giving precedence to the relative ranking of the predictors investigated in this study, rather than the prediction accuracy estimates. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7375115/ /pubmed/32469448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25020 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kottaram, Akhil
Johnston, Leigh A.
Tian, Ye
Ganella, Eleni P.
Laskaris, Liliana
Cocchi, Luca
McGorry, Patrick
Pantelis, Christos
Kotagiri, Ramamohanarao
Cropley, Vanessa
Zalesky, Andrew
Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1‐year follow‐up: Comparison of connectomic, structural, and clinical predictors
title Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1‐year follow‐up: Comparison of connectomic, structural, and clinical predictors
title_full Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1‐year follow‐up: Comparison of connectomic, structural, and clinical predictors
title_fullStr Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1‐year follow‐up: Comparison of connectomic, structural, and clinical predictors
title_full_unstemmed Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1‐year follow‐up: Comparison of connectomic, structural, and clinical predictors
title_short Predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1‐year follow‐up: Comparison of connectomic, structural, and clinical predictors
title_sort predicting individual improvement in schizophrenia symptom severity at 1‐year follow‐up: comparison of connectomic, structural, and clinical predictors
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25020
work_keys_str_mv AT kottaramakhil predictingindividualimprovementinschizophreniasymptomseverityat1yearfollowupcomparisonofconnectomicstructuralandclinicalpredictors
AT johnstonleigha predictingindividualimprovementinschizophreniasymptomseverityat1yearfollowupcomparisonofconnectomicstructuralandclinicalpredictors
AT tianye predictingindividualimprovementinschizophreniasymptomseverityat1yearfollowupcomparisonofconnectomicstructuralandclinicalpredictors
AT ganellaelenip predictingindividualimprovementinschizophreniasymptomseverityat1yearfollowupcomparisonofconnectomicstructuralandclinicalpredictors
AT laskarisliliana predictingindividualimprovementinschizophreniasymptomseverityat1yearfollowupcomparisonofconnectomicstructuralandclinicalpredictors
AT cocchiluca predictingindividualimprovementinschizophreniasymptomseverityat1yearfollowupcomparisonofconnectomicstructuralandclinicalpredictors
AT mcgorrypatrick predictingindividualimprovementinschizophreniasymptomseverityat1yearfollowupcomparisonofconnectomicstructuralandclinicalpredictors
AT pantelischristos predictingindividualimprovementinschizophreniasymptomseverityat1yearfollowupcomparisonofconnectomicstructuralandclinicalpredictors
AT kotagiriramamohanarao predictingindividualimprovementinschizophreniasymptomseverityat1yearfollowupcomparisonofconnectomicstructuralandclinicalpredictors
AT cropleyvanessa predictingindividualimprovementinschizophreniasymptomseverityat1yearfollowupcomparisonofconnectomicstructuralandclinicalpredictors
AT zaleskyandrew predictingindividualimprovementinschizophreniasymptomseverityat1yearfollowupcomparisonofconnectomicstructuralandclinicalpredictors