Cargando…

Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVES: To make informed decisions about healthcare, patients and the public, health professionals and policymakers need information about the effects of interventions. People need information that is based on the best available evidence; that is presented in a complete and unbiased way; and tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oxman, Andrew D, Glenton, Claire, Flottorp, Signe, Lewin, Simon, Rosenbaum, Sarah, Fretheim, Atle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036348
_version_ 1783561867529027584
author Oxman, Andrew D
Glenton, Claire
Flottorp, Signe
Lewin, Simon
Rosenbaum, Sarah
Fretheim, Atle
author_facet Oxman, Andrew D
Glenton, Claire
Flottorp, Signe
Lewin, Simon
Rosenbaum, Sarah
Fretheim, Atle
author_sort Oxman, Andrew D
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To make informed decisions about healthcare, patients and the public, health professionals and policymakers need information about the effects of interventions. People need information that is based on the best available evidence; that is presented in a complete and unbiased way; and that is relevant, trustworthy and easy to use and to understand. The aim of this paper is to provide guidance and a checklist to those producing and communicating evidence-based information about the effects of interventions intended to inform decisions about healthcare. DESIGN: To inform the development of this checklist, we identified research relevant to communicating evidence-based information about the effects of interventions. We used an iterative, informal consensus process to synthesise our recommendations. We began by discussing and agreeing on some initial recommendations, based on our own experience and research over the past 20–30 years. Subsequent revisions were informed by the literature we examined and feedback. We also compared our recommendations to those made by others. We sought structured feedback from people with relevant expertise, including people who prepare and use information about the effects of interventions for the public, health professionals or policymakers. RESULTS: We produced a checklist with 10 recommendations. Three recommendations focus on making it easy to quickly determine the relevance of the information and find the key messages. Five recommendations are about helping the reader understand the size of effects and how sure we are about those estimates. Two recommendations are about helping the reader put information about intervention effects in context and understand if and why the information is trustworthy. CONCLUSIONS: These 10 recommendations summarise lessons we have learnt developing and evaluating ways of helping people to make well-informed decisions by making research evidence more understandable and useful for them. We welcome feedback for how to improve our advice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7375421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73754212020-07-27 Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study Oxman, Andrew D Glenton, Claire Flottorp, Signe Lewin, Simon Rosenbaum, Sarah Fretheim, Atle BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: To make informed decisions about healthcare, patients and the public, health professionals and policymakers need information about the effects of interventions. People need information that is based on the best available evidence; that is presented in a complete and unbiased way; and that is relevant, trustworthy and easy to use and to understand. The aim of this paper is to provide guidance and a checklist to those producing and communicating evidence-based information about the effects of interventions intended to inform decisions about healthcare. DESIGN: To inform the development of this checklist, we identified research relevant to communicating evidence-based information about the effects of interventions. We used an iterative, informal consensus process to synthesise our recommendations. We began by discussing and agreeing on some initial recommendations, based on our own experience and research over the past 20–30 years. Subsequent revisions were informed by the literature we examined and feedback. We also compared our recommendations to those made by others. We sought structured feedback from people with relevant expertise, including people who prepare and use information about the effects of interventions for the public, health professionals or policymakers. RESULTS: We produced a checklist with 10 recommendations. Three recommendations focus on making it easy to quickly determine the relevance of the information and find the key messages. Five recommendations are about helping the reader understand the size of effects and how sure we are about those estimates. Two recommendations are about helping the reader put information about intervention effects in context and understand if and why the information is trustworthy. CONCLUSIONS: These 10 recommendations summarise lessons we have learnt developing and evaluating ways of helping people to make well-informed decisions by making research evidence more understandable and useful for them. We welcome feedback for how to improve our advice. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7375421/ /pubmed/32699132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036348 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Oxman, Andrew D
Glenton, Claire
Flottorp, Signe
Lewin, Simon
Rosenbaum, Sarah
Fretheim, Atle
Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study
title Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study
title_full Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study
title_short Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study
title_sort development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036348
work_keys_str_mv AT oxmanandrewd developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy
AT glentonclaire developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy
AT flottorpsigne developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy
AT lewinsimon developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy
AT rosenbaumsarah developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy
AT fretheimatle developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy