Cargando…
Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study
OBJECTIVES: To make informed decisions about healthcare, patients and the public, health professionals and policymakers need information about the effects of interventions. People need information that is based on the best available evidence; that is presented in a complete and unbiased way; and tha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036348 |
_version_ | 1783561867529027584 |
---|---|
author | Oxman, Andrew D Glenton, Claire Flottorp, Signe Lewin, Simon Rosenbaum, Sarah Fretheim, Atle |
author_facet | Oxman, Andrew D Glenton, Claire Flottorp, Signe Lewin, Simon Rosenbaum, Sarah Fretheim, Atle |
author_sort | Oxman, Andrew D |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To make informed decisions about healthcare, patients and the public, health professionals and policymakers need information about the effects of interventions. People need information that is based on the best available evidence; that is presented in a complete and unbiased way; and that is relevant, trustworthy and easy to use and to understand. The aim of this paper is to provide guidance and a checklist to those producing and communicating evidence-based information about the effects of interventions intended to inform decisions about healthcare. DESIGN: To inform the development of this checklist, we identified research relevant to communicating evidence-based information about the effects of interventions. We used an iterative, informal consensus process to synthesise our recommendations. We began by discussing and agreeing on some initial recommendations, based on our own experience and research over the past 20–30 years. Subsequent revisions were informed by the literature we examined and feedback. We also compared our recommendations to those made by others. We sought structured feedback from people with relevant expertise, including people who prepare and use information about the effects of interventions for the public, health professionals or policymakers. RESULTS: We produced a checklist with 10 recommendations. Three recommendations focus on making it easy to quickly determine the relevance of the information and find the key messages. Five recommendations are about helping the reader understand the size of effects and how sure we are about those estimates. Two recommendations are about helping the reader put information about intervention effects in context and understand if and why the information is trustworthy. CONCLUSIONS: These 10 recommendations summarise lessons we have learnt developing and evaluating ways of helping people to make well-informed decisions by making research evidence more understandable and useful for them. We welcome feedback for how to improve our advice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7375421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73754212020-07-27 Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study Oxman, Andrew D Glenton, Claire Flottorp, Signe Lewin, Simon Rosenbaum, Sarah Fretheim, Atle BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: To make informed decisions about healthcare, patients and the public, health professionals and policymakers need information about the effects of interventions. People need information that is based on the best available evidence; that is presented in a complete and unbiased way; and that is relevant, trustworthy and easy to use and to understand. The aim of this paper is to provide guidance and a checklist to those producing and communicating evidence-based information about the effects of interventions intended to inform decisions about healthcare. DESIGN: To inform the development of this checklist, we identified research relevant to communicating evidence-based information about the effects of interventions. We used an iterative, informal consensus process to synthesise our recommendations. We began by discussing and agreeing on some initial recommendations, based on our own experience and research over the past 20–30 years. Subsequent revisions were informed by the literature we examined and feedback. We also compared our recommendations to those made by others. We sought structured feedback from people with relevant expertise, including people who prepare and use information about the effects of interventions for the public, health professionals or policymakers. RESULTS: We produced a checklist with 10 recommendations. Three recommendations focus on making it easy to quickly determine the relevance of the information and find the key messages. Five recommendations are about helping the reader understand the size of effects and how sure we are about those estimates. Two recommendations are about helping the reader put information about intervention effects in context and understand if and why the information is trustworthy. CONCLUSIONS: These 10 recommendations summarise lessons we have learnt developing and evaluating ways of helping people to make well-informed decisions by making research evidence more understandable and useful for them. We welcome feedback for how to improve our advice. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7375421/ /pubmed/32699132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036348 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice Oxman, Andrew D Glenton, Claire Flottorp, Signe Lewin, Simon Rosenbaum, Sarah Fretheim, Atle Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study |
title | Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study |
title_full | Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study |
title_short | Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study |
title_sort | development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036348 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oxmanandrewd developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy AT glentonclaire developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy AT flottorpsigne developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy AT lewinsimon developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy AT rosenbaumsarah developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy AT fretheimatle developmentofachecklistforpeoplecommunicatingevidencebasedinformationabouttheeffectsofhealthcareinterventionsamixedmethodsstudy |