Cargando…

Radiofrequency denervation for chronic back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation (RD) of lumbosacral anatomical targets for the management of chronic back pain. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A database search (Medline, Medline in Process, Embase, C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chappell, Mary Elizabeth, Lakshman, Raj, Trotter, Patrick, Abrahams, Mark, Lee, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035540
_version_ 1783561871027077120
author Chappell, Mary Elizabeth
Lakshman, Raj
Trotter, Patrick
Abrahams, Mark
Lee, Michael
author_facet Chappell, Mary Elizabeth
Lakshman, Raj
Trotter, Patrick
Abrahams, Mark
Lee, Michael
author_sort Chappell, Mary Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation (RD) of lumbosacral anatomical targets for the management of chronic back pain. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A database search (Medline, Medline in Process, Embase, CINHAL and the Cochrane library) was conducted from January 2014 to April 2019 for placebo or no-treatment controlled trials of RD for the management of chronic back pain. Included trials were quality assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool and the quality of outcomes assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Meta-analysis was conducted to calculate mean difference (MD) in post-treatment Pain Score. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs were included in the review. There appears to be short-term pain relief (1–3 months) provided by RD of the sacroiliac joint (five trials, MD −1.53, CI −2.62 to 0.45) and intervertebral discs (four trials, MD −0.98, CI −1.84 to 0.12), but the placebo effect is large and additional intervention effect size is small (<1 on an 11 point (0–10) Pain Scale). Longer-term effectiveness (>6 months) is uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: RD of selected lumbosacral targets appears to have a small, short-term, positive effect for the management of patients with chronic back pain. However, the quality of evidence for the majority of outcomes is low or very low quality and there is still a degree of uncertainty, particularly around the duration of effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7375436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73754362020-07-27 Radiofrequency denervation for chronic back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chappell, Mary Elizabeth Lakshman, Raj Trotter, Patrick Abrahams, Mark Lee, Michael BMJ Open Rheumatology OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation (RD) of lumbosacral anatomical targets for the management of chronic back pain. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A database search (Medline, Medline in Process, Embase, CINHAL and the Cochrane library) was conducted from January 2014 to April 2019 for placebo or no-treatment controlled trials of RD for the management of chronic back pain. Included trials were quality assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool and the quality of outcomes assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Meta-analysis was conducted to calculate mean difference (MD) in post-treatment Pain Score. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs were included in the review. There appears to be short-term pain relief (1–3 months) provided by RD of the sacroiliac joint (five trials, MD −1.53, CI −2.62 to 0.45) and intervertebral discs (four trials, MD −0.98, CI −1.84 to 0.12), but the placebo effect is large and additional intervention effect size is small (<1 on an 11 point (0–10) Pain Scale). Longer-term effectiveness (>6 months) is uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: RD of selected lumbosacral targets appears to have a small, short-term, positive effect for the management of patients with chronic back pain. However, the quality of evidence for the majority of outcomes is low or very low quality and there is still a degree of uncertainty, particularly around the duration of effect. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7375436/ /pubmed/32699129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035540 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rheumatology
Chappell, Mary Elizabeth
Lakshman, Raj
Trotter, Patrick
Abrahams, Mark
Lee, Michael
Radiofrequency denervation for chronic back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Radiofrequency denervation for chronic back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Radiofrequency denervation for chronic back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Radiofrequency denervation for chronic back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Radiofrequency denervation for chronic back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Radiofrequency denervation for chronic back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort radiofrequency denervation for chronic back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Rheumatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035540
work_keys_str_mv AT chappellmaryelizabeth radiofrequencydenervationforchronicbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lakshmanraj radiofrequencydenervationforchronicbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT trotterpatrick radiofrequencydenervationforchronicbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abrahamsmark radiofrequencydenervationforchronicbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leemichael radiofrequencydenervationforchronicbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis