Cargando…
Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio
BACKGROUND: Acetabular protrusio (AP) is associated with distorted anatomic landmarks and insufficient bone stock that increases complexity of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study used a large national database to compare outcomes after THA in patients with and without AP. METHODS: The Nationwid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969953 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00121 |
_version_ | 1783561876798439424 |
---|---|
author | Greig, Danielle Hsiue, Peter P. Chen, Clark J. Trikha, Rishi Khoshbin, Amir Stavrakis, Alexandra I. |
author_facet | Greig, Danielle Hsiue, Peter P. Chen, Clark J. Trikha, Rishi Khoshbin, Amir Stavrakis, Alexandra I. |
author_sort | Greig, Danielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acetabular protrusio (AP) is associated with distorted anatomic landmarks and insufficient bone stock that increases complexity of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study used a large national database to compare outcomes after THA in patients with and without AP. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify patients with and without AP who underwent THA from 2010 to 2014. Primary outcomes analyzed included complications during index hospitalization and within 90 days of THA. RESULTS: Propensity score matching generated 4,395 patients without AP and 4,603 patients with AP. Patients with AP were older (68.1 versus 65.2 years, P < 0.0001), more predominantly women (82.1% versus 55.9%), and had more medical comorbidities as measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (2.29 versus 1.89, P < 0.0001). Patients with AP had an increased risk of requiring bone graft (odds ratio [OR] = 47.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.27 to 161.22), receiving a blood transfusion (OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.57 to 2.29), and suffering a periprosthetic fracture (OR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.10 to 5.97) within 90 days of THA. Length and cost of index hospitalization were greater for patients with AP (5.0 versus 4.3 days, P = 0.002; $19,211.88 versus $27,736.30, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Given the current emphasis on hospital cost optimization, it is important to ensure that patients with AP are managed appropriately. Attention should be placed on comprehensive preoperative planning and postoperative monitoring in this population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7375486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73754862020-08-05 Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio Greig, Danielle Hsiue, Peter P. Chen, Clark J. Trikha, Rishi Khoshbin, Amir Stavrakis, Alexandra I. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article BACKGROUND: Acetabular protrusio (AP) is associated with distorted anatomic landmarks and insufficient bone stock that increases complexity of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study used a large national database to compare outcomes after THA in patients with and without AP. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify patients with and without AP who underwent THA from 2010 to 2014. Primary outcomes analyzed included complications during index hospitalization and within 90 days of THA. RESULTS: Propensity score matching generated 4,395 patients without AP and 4,603 patients with AP. Patients with AP were older (68.1 versus 65.2 years, P < 0.0001), more predominantly women (82.1% versus 55.9%), and had more medical comorbidities as measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (2.29 versus 1.89, P < 0.0001). Patients with AP had an increased risk of requiring bone graft (odds ratio [OR] = 47.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.27 to 161.22), receiving a blood transfusion (OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.57 to 2.29), and suffering a periprosthetic fracture (OR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.10 to 5.97) within 90 days of THA. Length and cost of index hospitalization were greater for patients with AP (5.0 versus 4.3 days, P = 0.002; $19,211.88 versus $27,736.30, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Given the current emphasis on hospital cost optimization, it is important to ensure that patients with AP are managed appropriately. Attention should be placed on comprehensive preoperative planning and postoperative monitoring in this population. Wolters Kluwer 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7375486/ /pubmed/33969953 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00121 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Greig, Danielle Hsiue, Peter P. Chen, Clark J. Trikha, Rishi Khoshbin, Amir Stavrakis, Alexandra I. Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio |
title | Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio |
title_full | Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio |
title_short | Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio |
title_sort | outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients with acetabular protrusio |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33969953 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greigdanielle outcomesoftotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithacetabularprotrusio AT hsiuepeterp outcomesoftotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithacetabularprotrusio AT chenclarkj outcomesoftotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithacetabularprotrusio AT trikharishi outcomesoftotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithacetabularprotrusio AT khoshbinamir outcomesoftotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithacetabularprotrusio AT stavrakisalexandrai outcomesoftotalhiparthroplastyinpatientswithacetabularprotrusio |