Cargando…

Cost and outcomes of the ultrasound screening program for birth defects over time: a population-based study in France

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in the average costs and effectiveness of the French ultrasound screening programme for birth defects. DESIGN: A population-based study. SETTING: National Public Health Insurance claim database. PARTICIPANTS: All pregnant women in the ‘Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéfici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrier, Clément, Khoshnood, Babak, Dhombres, Ferdinand, Randrianaivo, Hanitra, Perthus, Isabelle, Jouannic, Jean-Marie, Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32690745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036566
_version_ 1783561880049025024
author Ferrier, Clément
Khoshnood, Babak
Dhombres, Ferdinand
Randrianaivo, Hanitra
Perthus, Isabelle
Jouannic, Jean-Marie
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
author_facet Ferrier, Clément
Khoshnood, Babak
Dhombres, Ferdinand
Randrianaivo, Hanitra
Perthus, Isabelle
Jouannic, Jean-Marie
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
author_sort Ferrier, Clément
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in the average costs and effectiveness of the French ultrasound screening programme for birth defects. DESIGN: A population-based study. SETTING: National Public Health Insurance claim database. PARTICIPANTS: All pregnant women in the ‘Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires’, a permanent representative sample of 1/97 of the individuals covered by the French Health Insurance System. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Trends in the costs and in the average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) of the screening programme (in € per case detected antenatally), per year, between 2006 and 2014. incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from 1 year to another were also estimated. We assessed costs related to the ultrasound screening programme of birth defects excluding the specific screening of Down’s syndrome. The outcome for effectiveness was the prenatal detection rate of birth defects, assessed in a previous study. Linear and logistic regressions were used to analyse time trends. RESULTS: During the study period, there was a slight decrease in prenatal detection rates (from 58.2% in 2006 to 55.2% in 2014; p=0.015). The cost of ultrasound screening increased from €168 in 2006 to €258 per pregnancy in 2014 (p=0.001). We found a 61% increase in the ACER for ultrasound screening during the study period. ACERs increased from €9050 per case detected in 2006 to €14 580 per case detected in 2014 (p=0.001). ICERs had an erratic pattern, with a strong tendency to show that any increment in the cost of screening was highly cost ineffective. CONCLUSION: Even if the increase in costs may be partly justified, we observed a diminishing returns for costs associated with the prenatal ultrasound screening of birth defects, in France, between 2006 and 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7375504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73755042020-07-27 Cost and outcomes of the ultrasound screening program for birth defects over time: a population-based study in France Ferrier, Clément Khoshnood, Babak Dhombres, Ferdinand Randrianaivo, Hanitra Perthus, Isabelle Jouannic, Jean-Marie Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in the average costs and effectiveness of the French ultrasound screening programme for birth defects. DESIGN: A population-based study. SETTING: National Public Health Insurance claim database. PARTICIPANTS: All pregnant women in the ‘Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires’, a permanent representative sample of 1/97 of the individuals covered by the French Health Insurance System. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Trends in the costs and in the average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) of the screening programme (in € per case detected antenatally), per year, between 2006 and 2014. incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from 1 year to another were also estimated. We assessed costs related to the ultrasound screening programme of birth defects excluding the specific screening of Down’s syndrome. The outcome for effectiveness was the prenatal detection rate of birth defects, assessed in a previous study. Linear and logistic regressions were used to analyse time trends. RESULTS: During the study period, there was a slight decrease in prenatal detection rates (from 58.2% in 2006 to 55.2% in 2014; p=0.015). The cost of ultrasound screening increased from €168 in 2006 to €258 per pregnancy in 2014 (p=0.001). We found a 61% increase in the ACER for ultrasound screening during the study period. ACERs increased from €9050 per case detected in 2006 to €14 580 per case detected in 2014 (p=0.001). ICERs had an erratic pattern, with a strong tendency to show that any increment in the cost of screening was highly cost ineffective. CONCLUSION: Even if the increase in costs may be partly justified, we observed a diminishing returns for costs associated with the prenatal ultrasound screening of birth defects, in France, between 2006 and 2014. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7375504/ /pubmed/32690745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036566 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Ferrier, Clément
Khoshnood, Babak
Dhombres, Ferdinand
Randrianaivo, Hanitra
Perthus, Isabelle
Jouannic, Jean-Marie
Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
Cost and outcomes of the ultrasound screening program for birth defects over time: a population-based study in France
title Cost and outcomes of the ultrasound screening program for birth defects over time: a population-based study in France
title_full Cost and outcomes of the ultrasound screening program for birth defects over time: a population-based study in France
title_fullStr Cost and outcomes of the ultrasound screening program for birth defects over time: a population-based study in France
title_full_unstemmed Cost and outcomes of the ultrasound screening program for birth defects over time: a population-based study in France
title_short Cost and outcomes of the ultrasound screening program for birth defects over time: a population-based study in France
title_sort cost and outcomes of the ultrasound screening program for birth defects over time: a population-based study in france
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32690745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036566
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrierclement costandoutcomesoftheultrasoundscreeningprogramforbirthdefectsovertimeapopulationbasedstudyinfrance
AT khoshnoodbabak costandoutcomesoftheultrasoundscreeningprogramforbirthdefectsovertimeapopulationbasedstudyinfrance
AT dhombresferdinand costandoutcomesoftheultrasoundscreeningprogramforbirthdefectsovertimeapopulationbasedstudyinfrance
AT randrianaivohanitra costandoutcomesoftheultrasoundscreeningprogramforbirthdefectsovertimeapopulationbasedstudyinfrance
AT perthusisabelle costandoutcomesoftheultrasoundscreeningprogramforbirthdefectsovertimeapopulationbasedstudyinfrance
AT jouannicjeanmarie costandoutcomesoftheultrasoundscreeningprogramforbirthdefectsovertimeapopulationbasedstudyinfrance
AT durandzaleskiisabelle costandoutcomesoftheultrasoundscreeningprogramforbirthdefectsovertimeapopulationbasedstudyinfrance