Cargando…

Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy

PURPOSE: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological staging system for breast cancer considers biologic factors in addition to the anatomical features included in the previous systems. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the 8th AJCC staging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, San-Gang, Wang, Jun, Lian, Chen-Lu, Lei, Jian, Hua, Li, Lin, Qin, Chen, Yong-Xiong, He, Zhen-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32172191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.012
_version_ 1783561893614452736
author Wu, San-Gang
Wang, Jun
Lian, Chen-Lu
Lei, Jian
Hua, Li
Lin, Qin
Chen, Yong-Xiong
He, Zhen-Yu
author_facet Wu, San-Gang
Wang, Jun
Lian, Chen-Lu
Lei, Jian
Hua, Li
Lin, Qin
Chen, Yong-Xiong
He, Zhen-Yu
author_sort Wu, San-Gang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological staging system for breast cancer considers biologic factors in addition to the anatomical features included in the previous systems. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the 8th AJCC staging system for T1-2N1 breast cancer and to assess the effect of additional chemotherapy and radiotherapy according to the new pathologic stages. METHODS: The cohort included patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (2010–2012) who had stage T1-2N1 invasive breast carcinoma and underwent mastectomy. All patients were restaged using the 8th AJCC staging system. The Kaplan–Meier method, Cox proportional hazards regression, and competing risks models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: We identified 9908 patients including 3022 (30.5%), 3131 (31.6%), 1940 (19.6%), 1194 (12.1%), and 621 (6.3%) were classified with stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease, respectively. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 97.3%, 94.3%, 88.3%, 84.0%, and 71.1% for stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease, respectively. Higher pathological stage was associated with a significantly higher risk of breast cancer-related death. Chemotherapy was associated with better BCSS regardless of the pathological stage, but radiotherapy was only associated with better BCSS in stage IIIA disease. CONCLUSIONS: The 8th AJCC pathological staging system provides more refined stratification for T1-2N1 breast cancer patients after mastectomy and may meet the needs of the current trend of individualized decision making for chemotherapy and radiotherapy in this patient subset.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7375569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73755692020-07-29 Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy Wu, San-Gang Wang, Jun Lian, Chen-Lu Lei, Jian Hua, Li Lin, Qin Chen, Yong-Xiong He, Zhen-Yu Breast Original Article PURPOSE: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological staging system for breast cancer considers biologic factors in addition to the anatomical features included in the previous systems. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the 8th AJCC staging system for T1-2N1 breast cancer and to assess the effect of additional chemotherapy and radiotherapy according to the new pathologic stages. METHODS: The cohort included patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (2010–2012) who had stage T1-2N1 invasive breast carcinoma and underwent mastectomy. All patients were restaged using the 8th AJCC staging system. The Kaplan–Meier method, Cox proportional hazards regression, and competing risks models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: We identified 9908 patients including 3022 (30.5%), 3131 (31.6%), 1940 (19.6%), 1194 (12.1%), and 621 (6.3%) were classified with stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease, respectively. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 97.3%, 94.3%, 88.3%, 84.0%, and 71.1% for stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease, respectively. Higher pathological stage was associated with a significantly higher risk of breast cancer-related death. Chemotherapy was associated with better BCSS regardless of the pathological stage, but radiotherapy was only associated with better BCSS in stage IIIA disease. CONCLUSIONS: The 8th AJCC pathological staging system provides more refined stratification for T1-2N1 breast cancer patients after mastectomy and may meet the needs of the current trend of individualized decision making for chemotherapy and radiotherapy in this patient subset. Elsevier 2020-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7375569/ /pubmed/32172191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.012 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Wu, San-Gang
Wang, Jun
Lian, Chen-Lu
Lei, Jian
Hua, Li
Lin, Qin
Chen, Yong-Xiong
He, Zhen-Yu
Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy
title Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy
title_full Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy
title_fullStr Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy
title_short Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy
title_sort evaluation of the 8th edition of the american joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage t1-2n1 breast cancer after mastectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32172191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.012
work_keys_str_mv AT wusangang evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy
AT wangjun evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy
AT lianchenlu evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy
AT leijian evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy
AT huali evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy
AT linqin evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy
AT chenyongxiong evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy
AT hezhenyu evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy