Cargando…
Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy
PURPOSE: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological staging system for breast cancer considers biologic factors in addition to the anatomical features included in the previous systems. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the 8th AJCC staging...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32172191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.012 |
_version_ | 1783561893614452736 |
---|---|
author | Wu, San-Gang Wang, Jun Lian, Chen-Lu Lei, Jian Hua, Li Lin, Qin Chen, Yong-Xiong He, Zhen-Yu |
author_facet | Wu, San-Gang Wang, Jun Lian, Chen-Lu Lei, Jian Hua, Li Lin, Qin Chen, Yong-Xiong He, Zhen-Yu |
author_sort | Wu, San-Gang |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological staging system for breast cancer considers biologic factors in addition to the anatomical features included in the previous systems. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the 8th AJCC staging system for T1-2N1 breast cancer and to assess the effect of additional chemotherapy and radiotherapy according to the new pathologic stages. METHODS: The cohort included patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (2010–2012) who had stage T1-2N1 invasive breast carcinoma and underwent mastectomy. All patients were restaged using the 8th AJCC staging system. The Kaplan–Meier method, Cox proportional hazards regression, and competing risks models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: We identified 9908 patients including 3022 (30.5%), 3131 (31.6%), 1940 (19.6%), 1194 (12.1%), and 621 (6.3%) were classified with stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease, respectively. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 97.3%, 94.3%, 88.3%, 84.0%, and 71.1% for stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease, respectively. Higher pathological stage was associated with a significantly higher risk of breast cancer-related death. Chemotherapy was associated with better BCSS regardless of the pathological stage, but radiotherapy was only associated with better BCSS in stage IIIA disease. CONCLUSIONS: The 8th AJCC pathological staging system provides more refined stratification for T1-2N1 breast cancer patients after mastectomy and may meet the needs of the current trend of individualized decision making for chemotherapy and radiotherapy in this patient subset. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7375569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73755692020-07-29 Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy Wu, San-Gang Wang, Jun Lian, Chen-Lu Lei, Jian Hua, Li Lin, Qin Chen, Yong-Xiong He, Zhen-Yu Breast Original Article PURPOSE: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological staging system for breast cancer considers biologic factors in addition to the anatomical features included in the previous systems. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the 8th AJCC staging system for T1-2N1 breast cancer and to assess the effect of additional chemotherapy and radiotherapy according to the new pathologic stages. METHODS: The cohort included patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (2010–2012) who had stage T1-2N1 invasive breast carcinoma and underwent mastectomy. All patients were restaged using the 8th AJCC staging system. The Kaplan–Meier method, Cox proportional hazards regression, and competing risks models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: We identified 9908 patients including 3022 (30.5%), 3131 (31.6%), 1940 (19.6%), 1194 (12.1%), and 621 (6.3%) were classified with stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease, respectively. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 97.3%, 94.3%, 88.3%, 84.0%, and 71.1% for stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease, respectively. Higher pathological stage was associated with a significantly higher risk of breast cancer-related death. Chemotherapy was associated with better BCSS regardless of the pathological stage, but radiotherapy was only associated with better BCSS in stage IIIA disease. CONCLUSIONS: The 8th AJCC pathological staging system provides more refined stratification for T1-2N1 breast cancer patients after mastectomy and may meet the needs of the current trend of individualized decision making for chemotherapy and radiotherapy in this patient subset. Elsevier 2020-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7375569/ /pubmed/32172191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.012 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wu, San-Gang Wang, Jun Lian, Chen-Lu Lei, Jian Hua, Li Lin, Qin Chen, Yong-Xiong He, Zhen-Yu Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy |
title | Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy |
title_full | Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy |
title_short | Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy |
title_sort | evaluation of the 8th edition of the american joint committee on cancer’s pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage t1-2n1 breast cancer after mastectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32172191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wusangang evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy AT wangjun evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy AT lianchenlu evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy AT leijian evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy AT huali evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy AT linqin evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy AT chenyongxiong evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy AT hezhenyu evaluationofthe8theditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerspathologicalstagingsysteminprognosisassessmentandtreatmentdecisionmakingforstaget12n1breastcanceraftermastectomy |