Cargando…

“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bajpai, J., Kagwade, S., Chandrasekharan, A., Dandekar, S., Kanan, S., Kembhavi, Y., Ghosh, J., Banavali, S.D., Gupta, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31865282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.004
_version_ 1783561922189197312
author Bajpai, J.
Kagwade, S.
Chandrasekharan, A.
Dandekar, S.
Kanan, S.
Kembhavi, Y.
Ghosh, J.
Banavali, S.D.
Gupta, S.
author_facet Bajpai, J.
Kagwade, S.
Chandrasekharan, A.
Dandekar, S.
Kanan, S.
Kembhavi, Y.
Ghosh, J.
Banavali, S.D.
Gupta, S.
author_sort Bajpai, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and taxane chemotherapy (CT) and assessed its effect on CIA and HR. METHODS: Non-metastatic breast cancer women undergoing (neo) adjuvant CT were randomized to receive SC using the Paxman scalp cooling system during every cycle of CT, or no SC. The primary end point (PEP) was successful hair preservation (HP) assessed clinically and by review of photographs after CT. HR was assessed at 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: 51 patients were randomized to SC (34) or control arm (17) in a 2:1 ratio. Twenty-five (49%) patients received A followed by T and the two arms were balanced with respect to this factor. HP rate was significantly higher in SC arm compared to control arm (56.3% vs 0%, P = 0.000004). HR was higher in SC arm compared to control at 6 weeks (89% vs 12%; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (100% vs 59%, P = 0.0003). Loss of hair at PEP evaluation, which was a quality of life measure, was significantly lower in SC versus control arm (45% vs 82%, P = 0.016). There were no grade 3–4 cold related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Women with breast cancer receiving A or T chemotherapy receiving SC were significantly more likely to have less than 50% hair loss after CT, superior hair regrowth and improvement in patient reported outcomes, with acceptable tolerance. It merits wider usage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7375683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73756832020-07-29 “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” Bajpai, J. Kagwade, S. Chandrasekharan, A. Dandekar, S. Kanan, S. Kembhavi, Y. Ghosh, J. Banavali, S.D. Gupta, S. Breast Original Article BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and taxane chemotherapy (CT) and assessed its effect on CIA and HR. METHODS: Non-metastatic breast cancer women undergoing (neo) adjuvant CT were randomized to receive SC using the Paxman scalp cooling system during every cycle of CT, or no SC. The primary end point (PEP) was successful hair preservation (HP) assessed clinically and by review of photographs after CT. HR was assessed at 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: 51 patients were randomized to SC (34) or control arm (17) in a 2:1 ratio. Twenty-five (49%) patients received A followed by T and the two arms were balanced with respect to this factor. HP rate was significantly higher in SC arm compared to control arm (56.3% vs 0%, P = 0.000004). HR was higher in SC arm compared to control at 6 weeks (89% vs 12%; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (100% vs 59%, P = 0.0003). Loss of hair at PEP evaluation, which was a quality of life measure, was significantly lower in SC versus control arm (45% vs 82%, P = 0.016). There were no grade 3–4 cold related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Women with breast cancer receiving A or T chemotherapy receiving SC were significantly more likely to have less than 50% hair loss after CT, superior hair regrowth and improvement in patient reported outcomes, with acceptable tolerance. It merits wider usage. Elsevier 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7375683/ /pubmed/31865282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.004 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Bajpai, J.
Kagwade, S.
Chandrasekharan, A.
Dandekar, S.
Kanan, S.
Kembhavi, Y.
Ghosh, J.
Banavali, S.D.
Gupta, S.
“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
title “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
title_full “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
title_fullStr “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
title_full_unstemmed “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
title_short “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
title_sort “randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31865282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.004
work_keys_str_mv AT bajpaij randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT kagwades randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT chandrasekharana randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT dandekars randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT kanans randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT kembhaviy randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT ghoshj randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT banavalisd randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia
AT guptas randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia