Cargando…
“Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia”
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and ta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31865282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.004 |
_version_ | 1783561922189197312 |
---|---|
author | Bajpai, J. Kagwade, S. Chandrasekharan, A. Dandekar, S. Kanan, S. Kembhavi, Y. Ghosh, J. Banavali, S.D. Gupta, S. |
author_facet | Bajpai, J. Kagwade, S. Chandrasekharan, A. Dandekar, S. Kanan, S. Kembhavi, Y. Ghosh, J. Banavali, S.D. Gupta, S. |
author_sort | Bajpai, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and taxane chemotherapy (CT) and assessed its effect on CIA and HR. METHODS: Non-metastatic breast cancer women undergoing (neo) adjuvant CT were randomized to receive SC using the Paxman scalp cooling system during every cycle of CT, or no SC. The primary end point (PEP) was successful hair preservation (HP) assessed clinically and by review of photographs after CT. HR was assessed at 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: 51 patients were randomized to SC (34) or control arm (17) in a 2:1 ratio. Twenty-five (49%) patients received A followed by T and the two arms were balanced with respect to this factor. HP rate was significantly higher in SC arm compared to control arm (56.3% vs 0%, P = 0.000004). HR was higher in SC arm compared to control at 6 weeks (89% vs 12%; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (100% vs 59%, P = 0.0003). Loss of hair at PEP evaluation, which was a quality of life measure, was significantly lower in SC versus control arm (45% vs 82%, P = 0.016). There were no grade 3–4 cold related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Women with breast cancer receiving A or T chemotherapy receiving SC were significantly more likely to have less than 50% hair loss after CT, superior hair regrowth and improvement in patient reported outcomes, with acceptable tolerance. It merits wider usage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7375683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73756832020-07-29 “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” Bajpai, J. Kagwade, S. Chandrasekharan, A. Dandekar, S. Kanan, S. Kembhavi, Y. Ghosh, J. Banavali, S.D. Gupta, S. Breast Original Article BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of scalp cooling (SC) to prevent chemotherapy induced alopecia (CIA) did not evaluate its effect on hair regrowth (HR) and was conducted in a predominantly taxane (T) treated population. We conducted an RCT of SC in a setting of anthracycline (A) and taxane chemotherapy (CT) and assessed its effect on CIA and HR. METHODS: Non-metastatic breast cancer women undergoing (neo) adjuvant CT were randomized to receive SC using the Paxman scalp cooling system during every cycle of CT, or no SC. The primary end point (PEP) was successful hair preservation (HP) assessed clinically and by review of photographs after CT. HR was assessed at 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: 51 patients were randomized to SC (34) or control arm (17) in a 2:1 ratio. Twenty-five (49%) patients received A followed by T and the two arms were balanced with respect to this factor. HP rate was significantly higher in SC arm compared to control arm (56.3% vs 0%, P = 0.000004). HR was higher in SC arm compared to control at 6 weeks (89% vs 12%; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (100% vs 59%, P = 0.0003). Loss of hair at PEP evaluation, which was a quality of life measure, was significantly lower in SC versus control arm (45% vs 82%, P = 0.016). There were no grade 3–4 cold related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Women with breast cancer receiving A or T chemotherapy receiving SC were significantly more likely to have less than 50% hair loss after CT, superior hair regrowth and improvement in patient reported outcomes, with acceptable tolerance. It merits wider usage. Elsevier 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7375683/ /pubmed/31865282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.004 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bajpai, J. Kagwade, S. Chandrasekharan, A. Dandekar, S. Kanan, S. Kembhavi, Y. Ghosh, J. Banavali, S.D. Gupta, S. “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
title | “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
title_full | “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
title_fullStr | “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
title_full_unstemmed | “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
title_short | “Randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
title_sort | “randomised controlled trial of scalp cooling for the prevention of chemotherapy induced alopecia” |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31865282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bajpaij randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT kagwades randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT chandrasekharana randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT dandekars randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT kanans randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT kembhaviy randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT ghoshj randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT banavalisd randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia AT guptas randomisedcontrolledtrialofscalpcoolingforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducedalopecia |